MetLife, Inc.
MetLife, Inc. (MET-PF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MET-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET-PF | $20.08 | +0.50% | 13.5B | 2.57 | $7.81 | +2.84% |
| AFL | $100.82 | -0.06% | 54.5B | 15.69 | $6.43 | +2.14% |
| MFC | $31.48 | +0.06% | 53.9B | 16.14 | $1.95 | +3.81% |
| MET-PA | $23.72 | +0.68% | 52.5B | 3.04 | $7.81 | +2.84% |
| MET-PE | $24.13 | +0.54% | 52.2B | 3.09 | $7.81 | +2.84% |
| MET | $77.68 | +0.03% | 52.1B | 12.69 | $6.12 | +2.84% |
| PRH | $25.49 | +0.20% | 37.2B | N/A | N/A | +5.83% |
| PRS | $24.28 | +0.83% | 37B | N/A | N/A | +5.79% |
| PRU | $103.44 | -0.30% | 36.6B | 16.32 | $6.34 | +5.12% |
| PUK | $25.18 | +0.52% | 32.5B | 14.99 | $1.68 | +1.84% |
Stock Comparison
MET-PF vs AFL Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while AFL trades at $100.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check AFL's competition here
MET-PF vs MFC Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while MFC trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check MFC's competition here
MET-PF vs MET-PA Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while MET-PA trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check MET-PA's competition here
MET-PF vs MET-PE Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while MET-PE trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check MET-PE's competition here
MET-PF vs MET Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while MET trades at $77.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check MET's competition here
MET-PF vs PRH Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while PRH trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check PRH's competition here
MET-PF vs PRS Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while PRS trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check PRS's competition here
MET-PF vs PRU Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while PRU trades at $103.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check PRU's competition here
MET-PF vs PUK Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while PUK trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check PUK's competition here
MET-PF vs UNM Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while UNM trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check UNM's competition here
MET-PF vs GL Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while GL trades at $143.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check GL's competition here
MET-PF vs GL-PD Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while GL-PD trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check GL-PD's competition here
MET-PF vs PRI Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while PRI trades at $266.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check PRI's competition here
MET-PF vs JXN Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while JXN trades at $88.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 66.87. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check JXN's competition here
MET-PF vs LNC Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while LNC trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check LNC's competition here
MET-PF vs LNC-PD Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while LNC-PD trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check LNC-PD's competition here
MET-PF vs AEL Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check AEL's competition here
MET-PF vs FGN Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while FGN trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check FGN's competition here
MET-PF vs FG Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while FG trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check FG's competition here
MET-PF vs CNO Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while CNO trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check CNO's competition here
MET-PF vs GNW Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while GNW trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check GNW's competition here
MET-PF vs BHFAL Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while BHFAL trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check BHFAL's competition here
MET-PF vs BHFAP Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while BHFAP trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check BHFAP's competition here
MET-PF vs BHF Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while BHF trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check BHF's competition here
MET-PF vs JXN-PA Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while JXN-PA trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check JXN-PA's competition here
MET-PF vs AEL-PB Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check AEL-PB's competition here
MET-PF vs NWLI Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check NWLI's competition here
MET-PF vs AEL-PA Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check AEL-PA's competition here
MET-PF vs MHNC Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while MHNC trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check MHNC's competition here
MET-PF vs BHFAO Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 998.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while BHFAO trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check BHFAO's competition here
MET-PF vs BHFAN Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 818.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while BHFAN trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check BHFAN's competition here
MET-PF vs BHFAM Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 721.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while BHFAM trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check BHFAM's competition here
MET-PF vs ABLLW Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 522.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while ABLLW trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check ABLLW's competition here
MET-PF vs ABL Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 522.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while ABL trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.78. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check ABL's competition here
MET-PF vs ABLLL Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while ABLLL trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check ABLLL's competition here
MET-PF vs CIA Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while CIA trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check CIA's competition here
MET-PF vs VERY Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check VERY's competition here
MET-PF vs MDWT Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check MDWT's competition here
MET-PF vs AAME Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while AAME trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check AAME's competition here
MET-PF vs IHC Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check IHC's competition here
MET-PF vs LFC Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check LFC's competition here
MET-PF vs GWGH Comparison July 2025
MET-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PF stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PF is priced at $20.08, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MET-PF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PF is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PF.Check GWGH's competition here