MetLife, Inc.
MetLife, Inc. MET-PA Peers
See (MET-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET-PA | $23.49 | +0.56% | 53B | 3.01 | $7.81 | +2.74% |
| AFL | $103.52 | -2.14% | 56B | 16.10 | $6.43 | +2.08% |
| MFC | $31.45 | -1.72% | 53.9B | 16.30 | $1.93 | +3.90% |
| MET | $80.15 | -1.16% | 53.8B | 13.09 | $6.12 | +2.74% |
| MET-PE | $23.90 | +0.63% | 53.6B | 3.06 | $7.81 | +2.74% |
| PRU | $108.66 | -0.31% | 38.5B | 17.14 | $6.34 | +4.86% |
| PRS | $24.00 | +1.16% | 38.3B | N/A | N/A | +5.87% |
| PRH | $25.26 | +0.60% | 38.3B | N/A | N/A | +5.87% |
| PUK | $24.75 | -0.20% | 31.9B | 14.73 | $1.68 | +1.87% |
| UNM | $81.24 | -1.00% | 14.2B | 9.58 | $8.48 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
MET-PA vs AFL Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while AFL trades at $103.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs MFC Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while MFC trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs MET Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while MET trades at $80.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs MET-PE Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while MET-PE trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs PRU Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while PRU trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs PRS Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while PRS trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs PRH Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while PRH trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs PUK Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while PUK trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs UNM Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while UNM trades at $81.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs MET-PF Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while MET-PF trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs GL-PD Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while GL-PD trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs GL Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while GL trades at $120.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs PRI Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while PRI trades at $274.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs JXN Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while JXN trades at $88.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 66.75. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs LNC Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while LNC trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs LNC-PD Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while LNC-PD trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs AEL Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs FG Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while FG trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs FGN Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while FGN trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs CNO Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while CNO trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs BHFAL Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while BHFAL trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs GNW Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while GNW trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs BHFAP Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while BHFAP trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs BHF Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while BHF trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs JXN-PA Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while JXN-PA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs AEL-PB Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs NWLI Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs AEL-PA Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs MHNC Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while MHNC trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs BHFAO Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while BHFAO trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs BHFAN Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 875.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while BHFAN trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs BHFAM Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while BHFAM trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs ABL Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 510.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while ABL trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.78. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs ABLLL Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while ABLLL trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs ABLLW Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 475.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while ABLLW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs CIA Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while CIA trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs VERY Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs MDWT Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs AAME Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while AAME trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs IHC Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs LFC Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.
MET-PA vs GWGH Comparison
MET-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MET-PA stands at 53B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MET-PA is priced at $23.49, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MET-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.01, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MET-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MET-PA is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MET-PA.