Merchants Bancorp

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 195.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HDB trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HDB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while IBN trades at $33.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check IBN's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while PNC trades at $189.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check PNC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while MFG trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check MFG's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB-PH trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check USB-PH's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB trades at $44.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check USB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB-PS trades at $19.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check USB-PS's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB-PP trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check USB-PP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB-PA trades at $833.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 237.32. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM and USB-PA have similar daily volatility (0.24).Check USB-PA's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while LYG trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check LYG's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while ITUB trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check ITUB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while DB trades at $33.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check DB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while TFC trades at $43.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check TFC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HBANL trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HBANL's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BSBR trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BSBR's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HBANM trades at $22.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HBANM's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while MTB trades at $188.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check MTB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while KB trades at $78.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check KB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while TFC-PO trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check TFC-PO's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FITB trades at $41.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FITB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BBDO trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BBDO's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while KEY-PL trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check KEY-PL's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BBD trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BBD's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while TFC-PI trades at $21.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check TFC-PI's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HBANP trades at $18.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HBANP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB-PR trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check USB-PR's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FCNCP trades at $21.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FCNCP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while TFC-PR trades at $19.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check TFC-PR's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FCNCO trades at $23.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FCNCO's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FCNCA trades at $1,883.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FCNCA's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while USB-PQ trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check USB-PQ's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HBAN trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HBAN's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while SHG trades at $48.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check SHG's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while RF-PF trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check RF-PF's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while RF trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check RF's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while RF-PC trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check RF-PC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CFG trades at $47.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CFG's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while KEY trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -223.06. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check KEY's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while KEY-PK trades at $22.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check KEY-PK's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BAP trades at $242.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BAP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while KEY-PJ trades at $22.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while KEY-PI trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check KEY-PI's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FITBI trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FITBI's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while RF-PE trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check RF-PE's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FITBP trades at $24.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FITBP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CFG-PD's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while VLYPN trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check VLYPN's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BCH trades at $27.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BCH's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FITBO trades at $20.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FITBO's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while WF trades at $52.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check WF's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FHN-PC trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FHN-PC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FHN-PB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FHN-PE trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FHN-PE's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CFG-PH trades at $26.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CFG-PH's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CIB trades at $44.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CIB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BSAC trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BSAC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FHN trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FHN's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CUBI-PE trades at $322.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while WBS trades at $56.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check WBS's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while SSB trades at $93.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check SSB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FHN-PF trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FHN-PF's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FHN-PD's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CFG-PE trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CFG-PE's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CMA trades at $67.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CMA's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while WAL trades at $77.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check WAL's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while UMBF trades at $110.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check UMBF's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while WTFC trades at $124.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check WTFC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while ONB trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check ONB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CBSH trades at $60.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CBSH's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CFR trades at $125.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CFR's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while ONBPO trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check ONBPO's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while ONBPP trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check ONBPP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while GGAL trades at $49.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check GGAL's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BPOP trades at $115.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BPOP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while ZION trades at $52.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check ZION's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BSMX's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while PNFP trades at $87.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check PNFP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while SNV trades at $46.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check SNV's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while SNV-PD trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check SNV-PD's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BOKF trades at $100.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BOKF's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while CADE trades at $34.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check CADE's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while PB trades at $66.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check PB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HOMB trades at $27.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HOMB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while OZK trades at $47.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check OZK's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FNB trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FNB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check BXS's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while VLY trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check VLY's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while VLYPP trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check VLYPP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while VLYPO trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check VLYPO's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while UBSI trades at $35.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check UBSI's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HWC trades at $58.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HWC's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while COLB trades at $23.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check COLB's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while HWCPZ trades at $23.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check HWCPZ's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while GBCI trades at $43.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check GBCI's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FFIN trades at $34.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FFIN's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check NYCB-PA's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while AX trades at $85.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check AX's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check AUBAP's competition here

MBINM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MBINM stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBINM is priced at $25.29, while FLG trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MBINM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, MBINM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBINM is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBINM.Check FLG's competition here