MasterBeef Group Ordinary Shares
MasterBeef Group Ordinary Shares MB Peers
See (MB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MB | $13.22 | +32.81% | 193.3M | 45.48 | $0.25 | N/A |
| MCD | $299.44 | +2.19% | 213.4B | 26.32 | $11.34 | +2.89% |
| SBUX | $94.67 | -0.61% | 108.1B | 34.59 | $2.75 | +3.12% |
| CMG | $55.91 | -0.05% | 76B | 49.92 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $149.76 | -0.72% | 42.4B | 30.30 | $5.03 | +1.80% |
| DRI | $209.51 | -2.93% | 24.9B | 23.96 | $8.88 | +3.32% |
| QSR | $67.36 | +0.16% | 22.2B | 22.97 | $2.95 | +3.53% |
| YUMC | $47.49 | +0.61% | 17.9B | 20.03 | $2.39 | +1.67% |
| DPZ | $465.04 | +0.34% | 16.1B | 26.94 | $17.45 | +1.70% |
| TXRH | $187.02 | +0.24% | 12.4B | 28.72 | $6.49 | +1.71% |
Stock Comparison
MB vs MCD Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while MCD trades at $299.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs SBUX Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while SBUX trades at $94.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CMG Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CMG trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 49.92. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs YUM Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while YUM trades at $149.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs DRI Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while DRI trades at $209.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs QSR Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while QSR trades at $67.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs YUMC Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while YUMC trades at $47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs DPZ Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while DPZ trades at $465.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs TXRH Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while TXRH trades at $187.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BROS Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BROS trades at $63.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 163.38. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CAVA Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CAVA trades at $91.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 76.26. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs WING Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while WING trades at $327.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs EAT Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while EAT trades at $164.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs SHAK Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while SHAK trades at $139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 507.14. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CAKE Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CAKE trades at $64.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs WEN Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while WEN trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs SG Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while SG trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -17.82. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs ARCO Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while ARCO trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs PZZA Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while PZZA trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CBRL Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CBRL trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CNNE Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CNNE trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs HDL Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while HDL trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FWRG Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FWRG trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 104.65. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BJRI Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 953.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BJRI trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 44.92. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BH-A Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 920.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BH-A trades at $1,428.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BH Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 913.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BH trades at $294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs KRUS Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 898.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while KRUS trades at $74.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -90.56. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BLMN Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 865.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BLMN trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs TWNPV Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MB is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs PTLO Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 741.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while PTLO trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs RUTH Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CHUY Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs TAST Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs NATH Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while NATH trades at $112.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs VENU Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while VENU trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs JACK Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 426.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while JACK trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs DIN Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 392.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while DIN trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs PBPB Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 382.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while PBPB trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs RICK Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 359.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while RICK trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 47.51. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs LOCO Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 335.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while LOCO trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs TWNP Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while TWNP trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FRGI Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs DENN Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while DENN trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BBQ Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs STKS Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while STKS trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs RRGB Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while RRGB trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs THCHW Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs THCH Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while THCH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BDL Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BDL trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs GRIL Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FATAV Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FATBP Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FATBP trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FATBB Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FATBB trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FATBW Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FATBW trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FAT Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FAT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs NDLS Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while NDLS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs RAVE Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while RAVE trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs ARKR Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while ARKR trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs MYT Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs GENK Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while GENK trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -96.00. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs GTIM Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while GTIM trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs YOSH Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while YOSH trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs REBN Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while REBN trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to REBN's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs PC Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while PC trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BTBD Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BTBD trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BTBDW Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BTB Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs FATBV Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MB is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs CHSN Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while CHSN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BFI Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs PNST Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while PNST trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs BFIIW Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs ONDR Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.
MB vs LUB Comparison
MB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MB stands at 193.3M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MB is priced at $13.22, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MB currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MB's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MB is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MB.