Metalpha Technology Holding Limited

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while DAL trades at $58.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DAL's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while UAL trades at $99.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check UAL's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while LUV trades at $30.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 49.23. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LUV's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while CEA trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CEA's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while JOBY trades at $17.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -15.54. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JOBY's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while RYAAY trades at $65.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check RYAAY's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while JOBY-WT trades at $6.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JOBY-WT's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while LTM trades at $43.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LTM's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while PAC trades at $244.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PAC's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ASR trades at $319.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ASR's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while AAL trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AAL's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ALK trades at $56.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ALK's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while OMAB trades at $103.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check OMAB's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while CPA trades at $116.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CPA's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while SKYW trades at $116.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SKYW's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while GOL trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GOL's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while CAAP trades at $21.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CAAP's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while AAWW trades at $102.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AAWW's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while PBI-PB trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PBI-PB's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while JBLU trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JBLU's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ATSG trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ATSG's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while UP trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UP's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check UP's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ALGT trades at $59.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ALGT's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ULCC trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -30.13. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ULCC's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while HA trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HA's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HA's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 671.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while VLRS trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check VLRS's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while SNCY trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SNCY's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 401.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ASLE trades at $8.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ASLE's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 365.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while BLDEW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BLDEW's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while BLDE trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BLDE's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while FLYX trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLYX's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while AZUL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AZUL's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while SRFM trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SRFM's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while SAVE trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SAVE's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while MESA trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MESA's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while FLYY trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLYY's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while SOAR trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SOAR's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLYX-WT's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ASLEW's competition here

MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 110.6M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $2.78, while ZNH trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ZNH's competition here