Lululemon Athletica Inc.
Lululemon Athletica Inc. LULU Peers
See (LULU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LULU | $237.58 | +1.09% | 27.3B | 16.15 | $14.71 | N/A |
| TJX | $123.49 | +0.09% | 137.7B | 29.05 | $4.25 | +1.26% |
| ROST | $127.58 | -0.25% | 41.7B | 20.15 | $6.33 | +1.22% |
| ONON | $52.05 | -0.84% | 16.9B | 66.73 | $0.78 | N/A |
| BURL | $232.64 | +0.87% | 14.7B | 28.51 | $8.16 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.82% |
| GAP | $21.81 | -0.41% | 8.1B | 9.48 | $2.30 | +2.82% |
| URBN | $72.54 | +4.52% | 6.5B | 15.21 | $4.77 | N/A |
| BOOT | $152.00 | -1.65% | 4.6B | 25.88 | $5.87 | N/A |
| ANF | $82.85 | +0.16% | 3.9B | 8.17 | $10.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LULU vs TJX Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while TJX trades at $123.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs ROST Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while ROST trades at $127.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs ONON Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while ONON trades at $52.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 66.73. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs BURL Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while BURL trades at $232.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs GPS Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs GAP Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while GAP trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs URBN Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while URBN trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs BOOT Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while BOOT trades at $152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs ANF Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while ANF trades at $82.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs FL Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while FL trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs BKE Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while BKE trades at $45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs AEO Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while AEO trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs VSCO Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while VSCO trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs CRI Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while CRI trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs HIBB Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs CHS Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs GES Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 628.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while GES trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -109.91. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs SCVL Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 511.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while SCVL trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs SFIX Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while SFIX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs CURV Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while CURV trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs CTRN Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 276.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while CTRN trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs ZUMZ Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while ZUMZ trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -663.00. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs GCO Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 212.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while GCO trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs JILL Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while JILL trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs DBI Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while DBI trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs PLCE Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while PLCE trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs BIRD Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while BIRD trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs DLTH Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while DLTH trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs DXLG Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while DXLG trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs CATO Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while CATO trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs TLYS Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while TLYS trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs DBGI Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while DBGI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs DBGIW Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs RENT Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while RENT trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs LVLU Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while LVLU trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.
LULU vs EXPR Comparison
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $237.58, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 16.15, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.