Lululemon Athletica Inc.
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LULU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LULU | $219.43 | +0.34% | 25.2B | 14.93 | $14.70 | N/A |
| TJX | $126.44 | +0.14% | 141.1B | 29.75 | $4.25 | +1.23% |
| ROST | $138.33 | +1.39% | 45.2B | 21.89 | $6.32 | +1.12% |
| BURL | $279.41 | +0.94% | 17.6B | 34.21 | $8.17 | N/A |
| ONON | $50.76 | +1.62% | 16.4B | 64.25 | $0.79 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +3.07% |
| GAP | $20.66 | +1.97% | 7.7B | 8.98 | $2.30 | +3.07% |
| URBN | $75.61 | +3.05% | 6.8B | 15.85 | $4.77 | N/A |
| BOOT | $174.51 | +4.23% | 5.3B | 29.66 | $5.88 | N/A |
| ANF | $92.34 | -1.62% | 4.4B | 9.11 | $10.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LULU vs TJX Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while TJX trades at $126.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check TJX's competition here
LULU vs ROST Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while ROST trades at $138.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ROST's competition here
LULU vs BURL Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while BURL trades at $279.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BURL's competition here
LULU vs ONON Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while ONON trades at $50.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 64.25. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ONON's competition here
LULU vs GPS Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GPS's competition here
LULU vs GAP Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while GAP trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GAP's competition here
LULU vs URBN Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while URBN trades at $75.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check URBN's competition here
LULU vs BOOT Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while BOOT trades at $174.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BOOT's competition here
LULU vs ANF Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while ANF trades at $92.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ANF's competition here
LULU vs BKE Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while BKE trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BKE's competition here
LULU vs FL Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while FL trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check FL's competition here
LULU vs AEO Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while AEO trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check AEO's competition here
LULU vs VSCO Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while VSCO trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check VSCO's competition here
LULU vs HIBB Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check HIBB's competition here
LULU vs CRI Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 958.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while CRI trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CRI's competition here
LULU vs CHS Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CHS's competition here
LULU vs GES Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 709.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while GES trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -124.00. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GES's competition here
LULU vs SFIX Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 659M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while SFIX trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check SFIX's competition here
LULU vs SCVL Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while SCVL trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check SCVL's competition here
LULU vs CURV Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while CURV trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CURV's competition here
LULU vs GCO Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 267.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while GCO trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GCO's competition here
LULU vs ZUMZ Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while ZUMZ trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -741.50. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ZUMZ's competition here
LULU vs CTRN Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while CTRN trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CTRN's competition here
LULU vs JILL Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while JILL trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check JILL's competition here
LULU vs DBI Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while DBI trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DBI's competition here
LULU vs PLCE Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while PLCE trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check PLCE's competition here
LULU vs BIRD Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while BIRD trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BIRD's competition here
LULU vs DLTH Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while DLTH trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DLTH's competition here
LULU vs DXLG Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while DXLG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DXLG's competition here
LULU vs CATO Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while CATO trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CATO's competition here
LULU vs TLYS Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while TLYS trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check TLYS's competition here
LULU vs DBGI Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while DBGI trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DBGI's competition here
LULU vs DBGIW Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DBGIW's competition here
LULU vs RENT Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while RENT trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check RENT's competition here
LULU vs LVLU Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while LVLU trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check LVLU's competition here
LULU vs EXPR Comparison July 2025
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $219.43, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check EXPR's competition here