MSP Recovery, Inc.
MSP Recovery, Inc. (LIFW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIFW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFW | $3.24 | N/A | 22.4M | -0.02 | -$141.50 | N/A |
| VEEV | $290.86 | +3.04% | 47.5B | 61.77 | $4.71 | N/A |
| GEHC | $75.22 | +2.83% | 34.3B | 15.41 | $4.88 | +0.18% |
| GEHCV | $56.00 | -4.08% | 25.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DOCS | $67.74 | +5.63% | 12.7B | 57.91 | $1.17 | N/A |
| SGFY | $30.49 | +0.07% | 8.9B | 70.91 | $0.43 | N/A |
| HQY | $89.82 | -1.36% | 7.8B | 65.56 | $1.37 | N/A |
| RCM | $14.31 | N/A | 6B | -102.21 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| BTSG | $24.87 | +3.80% | 4.4B | 99.48 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BTSGU | $86.00 | +3.34% | 4.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIFW vs VEEV Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while VEEV trades at $290.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 61.77. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check VEEV's competition here
LIFW vs GEHC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, GEHC has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while GEHC trades at $75.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GEHC's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to GEHC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to GEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check GEHC's competition here
LIFW vs GEHCV Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check GEHCV's competition here
LIFW vs DOCS Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while DOCS trades at $67.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check DOCS's competition here
LIFW vs SGFY Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SGFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SGFY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGFY's P/E ratio is 70.91. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SGFY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SGFY's competition here
LIFW vs HQY Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while HQY trades at $89.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to HQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check HQY's competition here
LIFW vs RCM Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while RCM trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to RCM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and RCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCM's competition here
LIFW vs BTSG Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BTSG trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 99.48. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BTSG's competition here
LIFW vs BTSGU Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BTSGU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BTSGU trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTSGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BTSGU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BTSGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BTSGU's competition here
LIFW vs WGS Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, WGS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while WGS trades at $128.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WGS's P/E ratio is 1608.31. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to WGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to WGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check WGS's competition here
LIFW vs ONEM Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ONEM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check ONEM's competition here
LIFW vs PRVA Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while PRVA trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 199.91. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check PRVA's competition here
LIFW vs PINC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PINC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while PINC trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PINC's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to PINC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to PINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check PINC's competition here
LIFW vs PGNY Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PGNY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while PGNY trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PGNY's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to PGNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to PGNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check PGNY's competition here
LIFW vs CERT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CERT trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is 229.40. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CERT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CERT's competition here
LIFW vs TXG Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TXG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while TXG trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TXG's P/E ratio is -20.43. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to TXG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to TXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check TXG's competition here
LIFW vs PHR Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PHR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while PHR trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PHR's P/E ratio is -40.18. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to PHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to PHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check PHR's competition here
LIFW vs NXGN Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while NXGN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check NXGN's competition here
LIFW vs GDRX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while GDRX trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check GDRX's competition here
LIFW vs OMCL Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while OMCL trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 67.24. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check OMCL's competition here
LIFW vs SDGR Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SDGR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SDGR trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDGR's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SDGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SDGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SDGR's competition here
LIFW vs AGTI Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while AGTI trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check AGTI's competition here
LIFW vs TDOC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while TDOC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check TDOC's competition here
LIFW vs CTEV Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CTEV trades at $72.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CTEV's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CTEV's competition here
LIFW vs EVH Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while EVH trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to EVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check EVH's competition here
LIFW vs HSTM Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 822.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while HSTM trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check HSTM's competition here
LIFW vs MPLN-WT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MPLN-WT's competition here
LIFW vs ACCD Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ACCD trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and ACCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACCD's competition here
LIFW vs SY Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 538.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SY's competition here
LIFW vs SHCR Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SHCR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SHCR's competition here
LIFW vs NUTX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, NUTX has a market cap of 513.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while NUTX trades at $92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NUTX's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to NUTX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to NUTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check NUTX's competition here
LIFW vs DH Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 422.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while DH trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DH's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to DH's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to DH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check DH's competition here
LIFW vs SLGCW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SLGCW's competition here
LIFW vs SLGC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SLGC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SLGC's competition here
LIFW vs MPLN Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MPLN trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MPLN's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MPLN's competition here
LIFW vs SPOK Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SPOK trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SPOK's competition here
LIFW vs NRC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 354.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while NRC trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to NRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check NRC's competition here
LIFW vs OPRX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while OPRX trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is -31.94. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to OPRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check OPRX's competition here
LIFW vs TBRG Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while TBRG trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is -26.95. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to TBRG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check TBRG's competition here
LIFW vs SLP Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SLP has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SLP trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLP's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SLP's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SLP's competition here
LIFW vs TRHC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while TRHC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check TRHC's competition here
LIFW vs SMFR Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SMFR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SMFR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SMFR's competition here
LIFW vs SOPH Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SOPH trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SOPH's competition here
LIFW vs HCAT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while HCAT trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check HCAT's competition here
LIFW vs CPSI Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CPSI trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CPSI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CPSI's competition here
LIFW vs CCLD Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CCLD trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is -141.50. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CCLD's competition here
LIFW vs AUGX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while AUGX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check AUGX's competition here
LIFW vs AMWL Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while AMWL trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check AMWL's competition here
LIFW vs CCLDO Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CCLDO trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CCLDO's competition here
LIFW vs EUDA Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, EUDA has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while EUDA trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EUDA's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to EUDA's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to EUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check EUDA's competition here
LIFW vs CCLDP Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and CCLDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCLDP's competition here
LIFW vs FORA Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while FORA trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to FORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check FORA's competition here
LIFW vs BEATW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BEATW has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BEATW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BEATW's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BEATW's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BEATW's competition here
LIFW vs BEAT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BEAT has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BEAT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BEAT's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BEAT's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BEAT's competition here
LIFW vs SNCE Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SNCE trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SNCE's competition here
LIFW vs AKLI Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while AKLI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check AKLI's competition here
LIFW vs SHLT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SHLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and SHLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLT's competition here
LIFW vs SHCRW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SHCRW's competition here
LIFW vs ONMD Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ONMD trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check ONMD's competition here
LIFW vs STRM Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while STRM trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and STRM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STRM's competition here
LIFW vs RNLX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while RNLX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to RNLX's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check RNLX's competition here
LIFW vs MGRX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MGRX trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MGRX's competition here
LIFW vs SCNX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SCNX has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while SCNX trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCNX's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to SCNX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to SCNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check SCNX's competition here
LIFW vs HCTI Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while HCTI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to HCTI's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check HCTI's competition here
LIFW vs BBLN Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BBLN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BBLN's competition here
LIFW vs VSEEW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while VSEEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check VSEEW's competition here
LIFW vs VSEE Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while VSEE trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check VSEE's competition here
LIFW vs INOV Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, INOV has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while INOV trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INOV's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to INOV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to INOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check INOV's competition here
LIFW vs BFRG Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BFRG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BFRG's competition here
LIFW vs ETAO Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ETAO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check ETAO's competition here
LIFW vs HLTH Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, HLTH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while HLTH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HLTH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to HLTH's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to HLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check HLTH's competition here
LIFW vs UPH Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while UPH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to UPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check UPH's competition here
LIFW vs BFRGW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BFRGW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while BFRGW trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BFRGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to BFRGW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to BFRGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check BFRGW's competition here
LIFW vs MSPR Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MSPR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MSPR trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MSPR's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MSPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MSPR's competition here
LIFW vs ACON Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ACON trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ACON's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to ACON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check ACON's competition here
LIFW vs ZCMD Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ZCMD trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check ZCMD's competition here
LIFW vs PEAR Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while PEAR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check PEAR's competition here
LIFW vs PEARW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PEARW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while PEARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PEARW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to PEARW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to PEARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check PEARW's competition here
LIFW vs EUDAW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, EUDAW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while EUDAW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EUDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to EUDAW's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to EUDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check EUDAW's competition here
LIFW vs WGSWW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, WGSWW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while WGSWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WGSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to WGSWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to WGSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check WGSWW's competition here
LIFW vs OTRK Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while OTRK trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check OTRK's competition here
LIFW vs CMAX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CMAX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CMAX's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CMAX's competition here
LIFW vs LIFWZ Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and LIFWZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIFWZ's competition here
LIFW vs WORX Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while WORX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to WORX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check WORX's competition here
LIFW vs FOXO Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, FOXO has a market cap of 302.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while FOXO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FOXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to FOXO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to FOXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check FOXO's competition here
LIFW vs KERN Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, KERN has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while KERN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KERN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to KERN's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to KERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check KERN's competition here
LIFW vs KERNW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while KERNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check KERNW's competition here
LIFW vs OTRKP Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OTRKP has a market cap of 100.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while OTRKP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OTRKP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to OTRKP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and OTRKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTRKP's competition here
LIFW vs ICCT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ICCT has a market cap of 97.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ICCT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ICCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ICCT's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to ICCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check ICCT's competition here
LIFW vs LIFWW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and LIFWW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIFWW's competition here
LIFW vs MSPRZ Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MSPRZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MSPRZ's competition here
LIFW vs CMAXW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and CMAXW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMAXW's competition here
LIFW vs ACONW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ACONW has a market cap of 26.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while ACONW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACONW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to ACONW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW and ACONW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACONW's competition here
LIFW vs MSPRW Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MSPRW has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MSPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MSPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MSPRW's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MSPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MSPRW's competition here
LIFW vs UTRS Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, UTRS has a market cap of 89. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while UTRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to UTRS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to UTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check UTRS's competition here
LIFW vs MTBCP Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MTBCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MTBCP trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MTBCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MTBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MTBCP's competition here
LIFW vs CSLT Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CSLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CSLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CSLT's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CSLT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CSLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CSLT's competition here
LIFW vs MTBC Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MTBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while MTBC trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to MTBC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to MTBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check MTBC's competition here
LIFW vs CHNGU Comparison August 2025
LIFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIFW stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CHNGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIFW is priced at $3.24, while CHNGU trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIFW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHNGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIFW's ROE is -17.49%, compared to CHNGU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIFW is less volatile compared to CHNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIFW.Check CHNGU's competition here