China Life Insurance Company Limited
China Life Insurance Company Limited LFC Peers
See (LFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFC | $7.25 | -2.03% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AFL | $103.87 | -1.10% | 56.16B | 16.15 | $6.43 | +2.00% |
| MFC | $31.75 | -0.01% | 54.71B | 16.71 | $1.90 | +3.80% |
| MET-PA | $24.25 | -0.33% | 53.96B | 3.11 | $7.81 | +2.75% |
| MET-PE | $23.29 | -0.72% | 53.74B | 2.98 | $7.81 | +2.75% |
| MET | $79.92 | -1.53% | 53.65B | 13.06 | $6.12 | +2.75% |
| PRH | $24.85 | -0.24% | 37.99B | N/A | N/A | +4.48% |
| PRS | $22.51 | -0.40% | 37.87B | N/A | N/A | +6.23% |
| PRU | $106.32 | -1.01% | 37.64B | 16.77 | $6.34 | +4.94% |
| PUK | $22.98 | -0.50% | 29.80B | 13.59 | $1.69 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
LFC vs AFL Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 56.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while AFL trades at $103.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MFC Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 54.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MFC trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MET-PA Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 53.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MET-PA trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MET-PE Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 53.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MET-PE trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MET Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 53.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MET trades at $79.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs PRH Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 37.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while PRH trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs PRS Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while PRS trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs PRU Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while PRU trades at $106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs PUK Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 29.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while PUK trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs UNM Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 13.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while UNM trades at $79.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MET-PF Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MET-PF trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs GL Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while GL trades at $119.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs GL-PD Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while GL-PD trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs PRI Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while PRI trades at $273.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs JXN Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while JXN trades at $86.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 65.28. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs LNC Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while LNC trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs LNC-PD Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while LNC-PD trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs AEL Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs FGN Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while FGN trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs FG Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while FG trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs CNO Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while CNO trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs BHF Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while BHF trades at $59.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs BHFAL Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while BHFAL trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs BHFAP Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while BHFAP trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs GNW Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while GNW trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs JXN-PA Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while JXN-PA trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs AEL-PB Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs NWLI Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs AEL-PA Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MHNC Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MHNC trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs BHFAO Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while BHFAO trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs BHFAN Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 924.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while BHFAN trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs ABL Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 862.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while ABL trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs ABLLL Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 841.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while ABLLL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs ABLLW Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 828.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while ABLLW trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs BHFAM Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 825.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while BHFAM trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.14. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs CIA Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 207.87M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while CIA trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs VERY Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs MDWT Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.
LFC vs AAME Comparison
LFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFC stands at N/A. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 34.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LFC is priced at $7.25, while AAME trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, LFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFC is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFC.