Loews Corporation
Loews Corporation (L&TFH.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | $105.29 | -0.85% | 21.7B | 13.38 | $7.87 | +0.24% |
| CB | $321.90 | -0.21% | 124.9B | 11.38 | $28.28 | +1.21% |
| PGR | $196.80 | -0.48% | 115.2B | 10.01 | $19.66 | +7.03% |
| TRV | $301.59 | +0.07% | 64.1B | 9.00 | $33.51 | +1.46% |
| ALL | $217.92 | -0.27% | 56.1B | 4.82 | $45.21 | +1.88% |
| ALL-PB | $25.88 | -0.12% | 54B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.88% |
| ALL-PH | $20.74 | +0.34% | 51.6B | 3.38 | $6.13 | +1.88% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.88% |
| WRB | $66.12 | -0.56% | 25.8B | 14.01 | $4.72 | +2.81% |
| CINF | $160.43 | +0.05% | 24.8B | 9.17 | $17.50 | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
L vs CB Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while CB trades at $321.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CB's competition here
L vs PGR Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while PGR trades at $196.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PGR's competition here
L vs TRV Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while TRV trades at $301.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check TRV's competition here
L vs ALL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ALL trades at $217.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL's competition here
L vs ALL-PB Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ALL-PB trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PB's competition here
L vs ALL-PH Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ALL-PH trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PH's competition here
L vs ALL-PG Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PG's competition here
L vs WRB Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while WRB trades at $66.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB's competition here
L vs CINF Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while CINF trades at $160.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CINF's competition here
L vs MKL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while MKL trades at $1,785.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MKL's competition here
L vs CNA Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while CNA trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNA's competition here
L vs AFG Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFG trades at $132.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFG's competition here
L vs WRB-PE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while WRB-PE trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PE's competition here
L vs AXS Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AXS trades at $99.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS's competition here
L vs WRB-PF Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while WRB-PF trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PF's competition here
L vs AXS-PE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AXS-PE trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS-PE's competition here
L vs KNSL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while KNSL trades at $303.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KNSL's competition here
L vs ALL-PJ Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
L vs THG Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while THG trades at $186.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check THG's competition here
L vs WRB-PG Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while WRB-PG trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PG's competition here
L vs WRB-PH Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while WRB-PH trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PH's competition here
L vs MCY Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while MCY trades at $96.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MCY's competition here
L vs WTM Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while WTM trades at $2,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WTM's competition here
L vs ALL-PI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ALL-PI trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PI's competition here
L vs SIGI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while SIGI trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGI's competition here
L vs RLI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while RLI trades at $49.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check RLI's competition here
L vs LMND Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while LMND trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -28.62. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check LMND's competition here
L vs HGTY-WT Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
L vs HGTY Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while HGTY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY's competition here
L vs AHL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL's competition here
L vs PLMR Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while PLMR trades at $110.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PLMR's competition here
L vs AHL-PD Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AHL-PD trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -88.31. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PD's competition here
L vs SLDE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while SLDE trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SLDE's competition here
L vs STC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while STC trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STC's competition here
L vs HCI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while HCI trades at $153.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HCI's competition here
L vs AHL-PE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AHL-PE trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -87.98. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PE's competition here
L vs SKWD Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while SKWD trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SKWD's competition here
L vs KMPR Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while KMPR trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPR's competition here
L vs HMN Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while HMN trades at $45.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HMN's competition here
L vs AFGB Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFGB trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGB's competition here
L vs AFGD Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFGD trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGD's competition here
L vs AFGC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFGC trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGC's competition here
L vs AFGE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFGE trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGE's competition here
L vs KMPB Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while KMPB trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPB's competition here
L vs PRA Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while PRA trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRA's competition here
L vs UVE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while UVE trades at $40.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UVE's competition here
L vs UFCS Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while UFCS trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UFCS's competition here
L vs SAFT Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while SAFT trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SAFT's competition here
L vs MHLA Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while MHLA trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MHLA's competition here
L vs ARGO Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO's competition here
L vs SIGIP Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while SIGIP trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGIP's competition here
L vs ASIC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 945M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ASIC trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ASIC's competition here
L vs HRTG Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 880.8M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while HRTG trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HRTG's competition here
L vs BOW Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 812.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while BOW trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check BOW's competition here
L vs ROOT Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 772.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ROOT trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ROOT's competition here
L vs DGICB Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while DGICB trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICB's competition here
L vs DGICA Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 607.8M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while DGICA trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICA's competition here
L vs ACIC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 504.9M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ACIC trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ACIC's competition here
L vs GBLI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while GBLI trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLI's competition here
L vs AII Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 377.7M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AII trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AII's competition here
L vs UIHC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UIHC's competition here
L vs NODK Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 263.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while NODK trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NODK's competition here
L vs KINS Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while KINS trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KINS's competition here
L vs PRHIZ Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while PRHIZ trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHIZ's competition here
L vs CNFR Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFR's competition here
L vs CNFRZ Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRZ's competition here
L vs PRHI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while PRHI trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHI's competition here
L vs UNAM Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UNAM's competition here
L vs HALL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 127.3K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while HALL trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HALL's competition here
L vs ARGO-PA Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
L vs FNHC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check FNHC's competition here
L vs Y Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check Y's competition here
L vs GBLIL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLIL's competition here
L vs AFHBL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFHBL's competition here
L vs MILE Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILE's competition here
L vs NSEC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NSEC's competition here
L vs AHL-PC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PC's competition here
L vs GFZ Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GFZ's competition here
L vs CNFRL Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRL's competition here
L vs STFC Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STFC's competition here
L vs AFSI Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFSI's competition here
L vs ENH Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ENH's competition here
L vs MILEW Comparison May 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 21.7B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $105.29, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILEW's competition here