Loews Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for L
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for L
Loews Corporation (L&TFH.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | $110.28 | +0.05% | 22.7B | 13.84 | $7.97 | +0.23% |
| CB | $325.74 | -1.28% | 127.1B | 12.69 | $25.68 | +1.19% |
| PGR | $196.59 | -1.49% | 115.2B | 10.22 | $19.24 | +7.03% |
| TRV | $299.59 | -0.57% | 64.8B | 10.92 | $27.44 | +1.47% |
| ALL | $214.88 | -0.10% | 55.8B | 5.64 | $38.06 | +1.90% |
| ALL-PB | $25.89 | +0.33% | 53.9B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.90% |
| ALL-PH | $20.83 | +1.51% | 51.9B | 3.43 | $6.08 | +1.90% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.90% |
| CINF | $163.35 | -0.20% | 25.4B | 10.78 | $15.16 | +2.17% |
| WRB | $65.99 | -1.45% | 25.1B | 14.83 | $4.45 | +2.81% |
Stock Comparison
L vs CB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while CB trades at $325.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CB's competition here
L vs PGR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while PGR trades at $196.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PGR's competition here
L vs TRV Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while TRV trades at $299.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check TRV's competition here
L vs ALL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ALL trades at $214.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL's competition here
L vs ALL-PB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ALL-PB trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PB's competition here
L vs ALL-PH Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ALL-PH trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PH's competition here
L vs ALL-PG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PG's competition here
L vs CINF Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while CINF trades at $163.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CINF's competition here
L vs WRB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while WRB trades at $65.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB's competition here
L vs MKL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while MKL trades at $1,966.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MKL's competition here
L vs CNA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while CNA trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNA's competition here
L vs AFG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFG trades at $130.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFG's competition here
L vs WRB-PE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while WRB-PE trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PE's competition here
L vs KNSL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while KNSL trades at $350.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KNSL's competition here
L vs AXS Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AXS trades at $99.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS's competition here
L vs WRB-PF Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while WRB-PF trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PF's competition here
L vs AXS-PE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AXS-PE trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS-PE's competition here
L vs ALL-PJ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
L vs THG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while THG trades at $178.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check THG's competition here
L vs WRB-PG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while WRB-PG trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PG's competition here
L vs WRB-PH Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while WRB-PH trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PH's competition here
L vs WTM Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while WTM trades at $2,298.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WTM's competition here
L vs RLI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while RLI trades at $57.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check RLI's competition here
L vs MCY Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while MCY trades at $93.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MCY's competition here
L vs ALL-PI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ALL-PI trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PI's competition here
L vs SIGI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while SIGI trades at $80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGI's competition here
L vs LMND Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while LMND trades at $62.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -27.89. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check LMND's competition here
L vs HGTY Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while HGTY trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY's competition here
L vs HGTY-WT Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
L vs PLMR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while PLMR trades at $130.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PLMR's competition here
L vs AHL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL's competition here
L vs AHL-PD Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AHL-PD trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -85.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PD's competition here
L vs SLDE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while SLDE trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SLDE's competition here
L vs SKWD Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while SKWD trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SKWD's competition here
L vs HCI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while HCI trades at $153.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HCI's competition here
L vs STC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while STC trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STC's competition here
L vs AHL-PE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AHL-PE trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -85.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PE's competition here
L vs KMPR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while KMPR trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPR's competition here
L vs HMN Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while HMN trades at $44.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HMN's competition here
L vs AFGB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFGB trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGB's competition here
L vs AFGD Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFGD trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGD's competition here
L vs AFGC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFGC trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGC's competition here
L vs KMPB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while KMPB trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPB's competition here
L vs AFGE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFGE trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGE's competition here
L vs PRA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while PRA trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRA's competition here
L vs SAFT Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while SAFT trades at $74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SAFT's competition here
L vs ARGO Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO's competition here
L vs MHLA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while MHLA trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MHLA's competition here
L vs UFCS Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while UFCS trades at $39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UFCS's competition here
L vs SIGIP Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 996.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while SIGIP trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGIP's competition here
L vs ASIC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 980.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ASIC trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ASIC's competition here
L vs UVE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 957.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while UVE trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UVE's competition here
L vs HRTG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while HRTG trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HRTG's competition here
L vs BOW Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 792.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while BOW trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check BOW's competition here
L vs DGICB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 668.7M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while DGICB trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICB's competition here
L vs ROOT Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 636.7M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ROOT trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ROOT's competition here
L vs DGICA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 622.9M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while DGICA trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICA's competition here
L vs ACIC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 565.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ACIC trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ACIC's competition here
L vs GBLI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while GBLI trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLI's competition here
L vs AII Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 363.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AII trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AII's competition here
L vs UIHC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UIHC's competition here
L vs NODK Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while NODK trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NODK's competition here
L vs KINS Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while KINS trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KINS's competition here
L vs PRHIZ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 214.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while PRHIZ trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHIZ's competition here
L vs CNFR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFR's competition here
L vs CNFRZ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRZ's competition here
L vs PRHI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while PRHI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHI's competition here
L vs UNAM Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UNAM's competition here
L vs HALL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 142K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HALL's competition here
L vs ARGO-PA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
L vs AFSI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFSI's competition here
L vs NSEC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NSEC's competition here
L vs Y Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check Y's competition here
L vs STFC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STFC's competition here
L vs AHL-PC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PC's competition here
L vs CNFRL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRL's competition here
L vs MILE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILE's competition here
L vs MILEW Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILEW's competition here
L vs FNHC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check FNHC's competition here
L vs ENH Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ENH's competition here
L vs GFZ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GFZ's competition here
L vs GBLIL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLIL's competition here
L vs AFHBL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $110.28, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFHBL's competition here