Loews Corporation
Loews Corporation (L&TFH.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | $109.34 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 13.73 | $7.97 | +0.23% |
| CB | $336.85 | +0.00% | 131.7B | 13.03 | $25.67 | +1.14% |
| PGR | $206.08 | +0.00% | 119.9B | 10.64 | $19.23 | +6.82% |
| TRV | $305.43 | +0.00% | 68B | 11.11 | $27.42 | +1.43% |
| ALL | $209.82 | +0.00% | 54.8B | 5.50 | $38.06 | +1.92% |
| ALL-PB | $26.20 | +0.00% | 54.6B | 2.17 | $12.04 | +1.92% |
| ALL-PH | $21.30 | +0.00% | 53.1B | 3.39 | $6.30 | +1.92% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.92% |
| WRB | $71.63 | +0.00% | 27.2B | 16.08 | $4.45 | +2.71% |
| MKL | $2,066.97 | +0.00% | 26.2B | 12.27 | $169.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
L vs CB Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while CB trades at $336.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CB's competition here
L vs PGR Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 119.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while PGR trades at $206.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PGR's competition here
L vs TRV Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while TRV trades at $305.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check TRV's competition here
L vs ALL Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ALL trades at $209.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL's competition here
L vs ALL-PB Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ALL-PB trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PB's competition here
L vs ALL-PH Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ALL-PH trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PH's competition here
L vs ALL-PG Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PG's competition here
L vs WRB Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while WRB trades at $71.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB's competition here
L vs MKL Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while MKL trades at $2,066.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MKL's competition here
L vs CINF Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while CINF trades at $160.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CINF's competition here
L vs CNA Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while CNA trades at $47.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNA's competition here
L vs AFG Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AFG trades at $130.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFG's competition here
L vs WRB-PE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while WRB-PE trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PE's competition here
L vs KNSL Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while KNSL trades at $380.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KNSL's competition here
L vs AXS Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AXS trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS's competition here
L vs WRB-PF Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while WRB-PF trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PF's competition here
L vs AXS-PE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AXS-PE trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS-PE's competition here
L vs ALL-PJ Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
L vs WRB-PG Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while WRB-PG trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PG's competition here
L vs WRB-PH Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while WRB-PH trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PH's competition here
L vs THG Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while THG trades at $173.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check THG's competition here
L vs RLI Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while RLI trades at $61.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check RLI's competition here
L vs WTM Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while WTM trades at $2,223.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WTM's competition here
L vs ALL-PI Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ALL-PI trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PI's competition here
L vs SIGI Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while SIGI trades at $82.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGI's competition here
L vs MCY Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while MCY trades at $85.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MCY's competition here
L vs HGTY Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while HGTY trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY's competition here
L vs LMND Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while LMND trades at $52.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -21.88. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check LMND's competition here
L vs HGTY-WT Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
L vs AHL Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL's competition here
L vs PLMR Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while PLMR trades at $120.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PLMR's competition here
L vs AHL-PD Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AHL-PD trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -85.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PD's competition here
L vs SLDE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while SLDE trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SLDE's competition here
L vs HCI Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while HCI trades at $156.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HCI's competition here
L vs STC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while STC trades at $67.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STC's competition here
L vs AHL-PE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AHL-PE trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -85.76. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PE's competition here
L vs SKWD Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while SKWD trades at $45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SKWD's competition here
L vs KMPR Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while KMPR trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPR's competition here
L vs AFGB Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AFGB trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGB's competition here
L vs HMN Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while HMN trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HMN's competition here
L vs AFGD Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AFGD trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGD's competition here
L vs AFGC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AFGC trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGC's competition here
L vs AFGE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AFGE trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGE's competition here
L vs KMPB Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while KMPB trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPB's competition here
L vs PRA Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while PRA trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRA's competition here
L vs SAFT Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while SAFT trades at $77.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SAFT's competition here
L vs ASIC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ASIC trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ASIC's competition here
L vs MHLA Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while MHLA trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MHLA's competition here
L vs ARGO Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO's competition here
L vs SIGIP Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while SIGIP trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGIP's competition here
L vs UFCS Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 975.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while UFCS trades at $37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UFCS's competition here
L vs UVE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 915.5M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while UVE trades at $31.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UVE's competition here
L vs BOW Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 908.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while BOW trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check BOW's competition here
L vs HRTG Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 842.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while HRTG trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HRTG's competition here
L vs ROOT Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 837.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ROOT trades at $57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ROOT's competition here
L vs DGICA Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 642.5M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while DGICA trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICA's competition here
L vs DGICB Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 576.7M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while DGICB trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICB's competition here
L vs ACIC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 549.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ACIC trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ACIC's competition here
L vs GBLI Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 397.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while GBLI trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLI's competition here
L vs AII Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 391.7M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AII trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AII's competition here
L vs UIHC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UIHC's competition here
L vs NODK Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while NODK trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 122.36. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NODK's competition here
L vs KINS Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while KINS trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KINS's competition here
L vs PRHIZ Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while PRHIZ trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHIZ's competition here
L vs CNFR Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFR's competition here
L vs CNFRZ Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRZ's competition here
L vs PRHI Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while PRHI trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHI's competition here
L vs UNAM Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UNAM's competition here
L vs HALL Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HALL's competition here
L vs ARGO-PA Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
L vs MILE Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILE's competition here
L vs Y Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check Y's competition here
L vs STFC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STFC's competition here
L vs FNHC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check FNHC's competition here
L vs AHL-PC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PC's competition here
L vs NSEC Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NSEC's competition here
L vs GFZ Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GFZ's competition here
L vs MILEW Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILEW's competition here
L vs AFHBL Comparison February 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $109.34, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFHBL's competition here