Jackson Financial Inc.
Jackson Financial Inc. JXN-PA Peers
See (JXN-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JXN-PA | $25.32 | -0.31% | 1.8B | N/A | N/A | +7.86% |
| AFL | $105.46 | +0.37% | 57B | 16.40 | $6.43 | +2.05% |
| MFC | $31.96 | -0.09% | 54.7B | 16.55 | $1.93 | +3.83% |
| MET | $80.42 | +0.06% | 54B | 13.14 | $6.12 | +2.75% |
| MET-PE | $23.59 | -0.21% | 52.9B | 3.02 | $7.81 | +2.75% |
| MET-PA | $23.18 | -1.53% | 52.4B | 2.97 | $7.81 | +2.75% |
| PRU | $107.44 | +0.29% | 38B | 16.94 | $6.34 | +4.94% |
| PRH | $24.93 | -0.32% | 37.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.94% |
| PRS | $23.51 | -0.25% | 37.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.96% |
| PUK | $25.02 | -0.71% | 32.2B | 14.88 | $1.68 | +1.85% |
Stock Comparison
JXN-PA vs AFL Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while AFL trades at $105.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MFC Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MFC trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MET Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MET trades at $80.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MET-PE Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MET-PE trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MET-PA Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MET-PA trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs PRU Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while PRU trades at $107.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs PRH Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while PRH trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs PRS Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while PRS trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs PUK Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while PUK trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs UNM Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while UNM trades at $80.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MET-PF Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MET-PF trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs GL Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while GL trades at $124.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs GL-PD Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while GL-PD trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs PRI Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while PRI trades at $273.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs JXN Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while JXN trades at $88.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.26. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs LNC Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while LNC trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs LNC-PD Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while LNC-PD trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs AEL Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs FG Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while FG trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs FGN Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while FGN trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs CNO Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while CNO trades at $38.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs GNW Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while GNW trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs BHFAL Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while BHFAL trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs BHF Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while BHF trades at $53.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs BHFAP Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while BHFAP trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs AEL-PB Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs NWLI Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs AEL-PA Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MHNC Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MHNC trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs BHFAO Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while BHFAO trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs BHFAN Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 849.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while BHFAN trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs BHFAM Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 763.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while BHFAM trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs ABLLW Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 657.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while ABLLW trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs ABLLL Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while ABLLL trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs ABL Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 491.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while ABL trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs CIA Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while CIA trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs VERY Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs MDWT Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs AAME Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while AAME trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs IHC Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs GWGH Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.
JXN-PA vs LFC Comparison
JXN-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JXN-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JXN-PA is priced at $25.32, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JXN-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JXN-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JXN-PA is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JXN-PA.