Joby Aviation, Inc. WT
Joby Aviation, Inc. WT (JOBY-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JOBY-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOBY-WT | $7.23 | +0.00% | 15.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DAL | $58.44 | +0.00% | 38.8B | 8.64 | $6.88 | +1.08% |
| UAL | $98.47 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 10.01 | $9.97 | N/A |
| LUV | $30.72 | +0.00% | 16.3B | 48.41 | $0.64 | +2.32% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| JOBY | $18.01 | +0.00% | 15.2B | -16.63 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $65.49 | +0.00% | 14.1B | 14.81 | $4.44 | +1.29% |
| LTM | $43.30 | +0.00% | 13.6B | 11.57 | $3.88 | +2.25% |
| PAC | $250.10 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 24.45 | $10.00 | +4.76% |
| ASR | $325.13 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 13.25 | $24.31 | +7.56% |
Stock Comparison
JOBY-WT vs DAL Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while DAL trades at $58.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check DAL's competition here
JOBY-WT vs UAL Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while UAL trades at $98.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check UAL's competition here
JOBY-WT vs LUV Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while LUV trades at $30.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 48.41. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check LUV's competition here
JOBY-WT vs CEA Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check CEA's competition here
JOBY-WT vs JOBY Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while JOBY trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check JOBY's competition here
JOBY-WT vs RYAAY Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while RYAAY trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check RYAAY's competition here
JOBY-WT vs LTM Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while LTM trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check LTM's competition here
JOBY-WT vs PAC Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while PAC trades at $250.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check PAC's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ASR Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ASR trades at $325.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ASR's competition here
JOBY-WT vs AAL Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while AAL trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check AAL's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ALK Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ALK trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ALK's competition here
JOBY-WT vs OMAB Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while OMAB trades at $107.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check OMAB's competition here
JOBY-WT vs CPA Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while CPA trades at $120.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check CPA's competition here
JOBY-WT vs SKYW Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while SKYW trades at $117.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check SKYW's competition here
JOBY-WT vs GOL Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check GOL's competition here
JOBY-WT vs CAAP Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while CAAP trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check CAAP's competition here
JOBY-WT vs AAWW Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check AAWW's competition here
JOBY-WT vs PBI-PB Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while PBI-PB trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check PBI-PB's competition here
JOBY-WT vs JBLU Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while JBLU trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check JBLU's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ATSG Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ATSG's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ALGT Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ALGT trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ALGT's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ULCC Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ULCC trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ULCC's competition here
JOBY-WT vs UP Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while UP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to UP's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check UP's competition here
JOBY-WT vs HA Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to HA's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check HA's competition here
JOBY-WT vs SNCY Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 692M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while SNCY trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check SNCY's competition here
JOBY-WT vs VLRS Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 679.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while VLRS trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check VLRS's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ASLE Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 414.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ASLE trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ASLE's competition here
JOBY-WT vs BLDE Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 358.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while BLDE trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check BLDE's competition here
JOBY-WT vs BLDEW Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 326M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while BLDEW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check BLDEW's competition here
JOBY-WT vs FLYX Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 230M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while FLYX trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check FLYX's competition here
JOBY-WT vs SRFM Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while SRFM trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check SRFM's competition here
JOBY-WT vs AZUL Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check AZUL's competition here
JOBY-WT vs SAVE Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check SAVE's competition here
JOBY-WT vs MATH Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while MATH trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check MATH's competition here
JOBY-WT vs FLYY Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while FLYY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check FLYY's competition here
JOBY-WT vs MESA Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while MESA trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check MESA's competition here
JOBY-WT vs SOAR Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while SOAR trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check SOAR's competition here
JOBY-WT vs FLYX-WT Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ASLEW Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ASLEW's competition here
JOBY-WT vs ZNH Comparison August 2025
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $7.23, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.92%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.Check ZNH's competition here