Joby Aviation, Inc. WT
Joby Aviation, Inc. WT JOBY-WT Peers
See (JOBY-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOBY-WT | $1.70 | -2.30% | 6.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DAL | $47.21 | -0.75% | 30.8B | 8.37 | $5.64 | +1.27% |
| UAL | $74.27 | -0.04% | 24.3B | 6.76 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $31.37 | +0.67% | 17.9B | 35.25 | $0.89 | +2.30% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $37.85 | -0.38% | 11.4B | 10.66 | $3.55 | +1.69% |
| PAC | $215.40 | -3.82% | 11B | 22.84 | $9.43 | +5.32% |
| ASR | $300.79 | -1.93% | 9B | 12.61 | $23.86 | +0.52% |
| AAL | $10.62 | +0.38% | 7B | 10.62 | $1.00 | N/A |
| JOBY | $8.54 | -3.39% | 6.8B | -10.17 | -$0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JOBY-WT vs DAL Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while DAL trades at $47.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs UAL Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while UAL trades at $74.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs LUV Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while LUV trades at $31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs CEA Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs LTM Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while LTM trades at $37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs PAC Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while PAC trades at $215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ASR Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ASR trades at $300.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs AAL Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while AAL trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs JOBY Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while JOBY trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs RYAAY Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while RYAAY trades at $54.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ALK Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ALK trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs OMAB Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while OMAB trades at $100.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs GOL Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs CPA Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while CPA trades at $102.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs SKYW Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while SKYW trades at $95.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs PBI-PB Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while PBI-PB trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs CAAP Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while CAAP trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs AAWW Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ATSG Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs JBLU Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while JBLU trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs UP Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 964.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while UP trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs HA Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ALGT Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 916.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ALGT trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ULCC Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 769.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ULCC trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs SNCY Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 569.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while SNCY trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs VLRS Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 480.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while VLRS trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ASLE Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 309.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ASLE trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -52.91. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs BLDEW Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while BLDEW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs BLDE Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while BLDE trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs FLYX Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while FLYX trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs FLYY Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while FLYY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs MATH Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while MATH trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs SAVE Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs AZUL Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs MESA Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while MESA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs SRFM Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while SRFM trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs FLYX-WT Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs SOAR Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while SOAR trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ASLEW Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.
JOBY-WT vs ZNH Comparison
JOBY-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBY-WT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBY-WT is priced at $1.70, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBY-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBY-WT is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBY-WT.