Jack in the Box Inc.
Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JACK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACK | $20.92 | -6.69% | 395M | -1.94 | -$10.79 | +8.29% |
| MCD | $302.67 | +1.15% | 216.5B | 26.70 | $11.34 | +2.32% |
| SBUX | $92.96 | -0.76% | 105.6B | 33.80 | $2.75 | +2.60% |
| CMG | $44.38 | -1.07% | 59.5B | 39.28 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $145.18 | +0.62% | 40.4B | 28.93 | $5.02 | +1.91% |
| DRI | $202.73 | -0.19% | 23.7B | 22.86 | $8.87 | +2.82% |
| QSR | $68.82 | -0.33% | 22.5B | 23.48 | $2.93 | +3.50% |
| YUMC | $46.49 | -0.96% | 17.4B | 19.45 | $2.39 | +1.72% |
| DPZ | $470.05 | -0.90% | 16B | 27.30 | $17.22 | +1.39% |
| TXRH | $184.58 | -1.60% | 12.2B | 28.53 | $6.47 | +1.40% |
Stock Comparison
JACK vs MCD Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while MCD trades at $302.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check MCD's competition here
JACK vs SBUX Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while SBUX trades at $92.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check SBUX's competition here
JACK vs CMG Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CMG trades at $44.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CMG's competition here
JACK vs YUM Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while YUM trades at $145.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check YUM's competition here
JACK vs DRI Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while DRI trades at $202.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check DRI's competition here
JACK vs QSR Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while QSR trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check QSR's competition here
JACK vs YUMC Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while YUMC trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check YUMC's competition here
JACK vs DPZ Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while DPZ trades at $470.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check DPZ's competition here
JACK vs TXRH Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while TXRH trades at $184.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check TXRH's competition here
JACK vs BROS Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BROS trades at $58.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 149.46. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BROS's competition here
JACK vs CAVA Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CAVA trades at $85.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 71.35. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CAVA's competition here
JACK vs WING Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while WING trades at $290.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check WING's competition here
JACK vs EAT Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while EAT trades at $159.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check EAT's competition here
JACK vs SHAK Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while SHAK trades at $137.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 472.69. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check SHAK's competition here
JACK vs CAKE Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CAKE trades at $63.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CAKE's competition here
JACK vs WEN Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while WEN trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check WEN's competition here
JACK vs SG Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while SG trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check SG's competition here
JACK vs ARCO Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while ARCO trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check ARCO's competition here
JACK vs CBRL Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CBRL trades at $62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CBRL's competition here
JACK vs PZZA Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while PZZA trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check PZZA's competition here
JACK vs CNNE Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CNNE trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CNNE's competition here
JACK vs HDL Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while HDL trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check HDL's competition here
JACK vs KRUS Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while KRUS trades at $86.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -105.93. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check KRUS's competition here
JACK vs FWRG Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FWRG trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 99.29. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FWRG's competition here
JACK vs BH Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 951.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BH trades at $309.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BH's competition here
JACK vs BH-A Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BH-A trades at $1,491.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BH-A's competition here
JACK vs TWNPV Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check TWNPV's competition here
JACK vs BLMN Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 804.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BLMN trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BLMN's competition here
JACK vs BJRI Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 803.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BJRI trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BJRI's competition here
JACK vs RUTH Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check RUTH's competition here
JACK vs CHUY Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CHUY's competition here
JACK vs PTLO Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 635.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while PTLO trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check PTLO's competition here
JACK vs TAST Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check TAST's competition here
JACK vs VENU Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while VENU trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check VENU's competition here
JACK vs NATH Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while NATH trades at $94.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check NATH's competition here
JACK vs DIN Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while DIN trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check DIN's competition here
JACK vs PBPB Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while PBPB trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check PBPB's competition here
JACK vs RICK Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while RICK trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 43.19. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check RICK's competition here
JACK vs LOCO Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while LOCO trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check LOCO's competition here
JACK vs TWNP Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while TWNP trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check TWNP's competition here
JACK vs MB Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while MB trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check MB's competition here
JACK vs FRGI Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FRGI's competition here
JACK vs DENN Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while DENN trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check DENN's competition here
JACK vs BBQ Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BBQ's competition here
JACK vs RRGB Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while RRGB trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check RRGB's competition here
JACK vs THCHW Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check THCHW's competition here
JACK vs STKS Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while STKS trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check STKS's competition here
JACK vs THCH Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 96.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while THCH trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check THCH's competition here
JACK vs BDL Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BDL trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BDL's competition here
JACK vs GRIL Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check GRIL's competition here
JACK vs FATAV Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FATAV's competition here
JACK vs FATBW Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FATBW's competition here
JACK vs FATBP Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FATBP trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FATBP's competition here
JACK vs FAT Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FAT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FAT's competition here
JACK vs NDLS Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while NDLS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check NDLS's competition here
JACK vs RAVE Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while RAVE trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check RAVE's competition here
JACK vs FATBB Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FATBB trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FATBB's competition here
JACK vs ARKR Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while ARKR trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check ARKR's competition here
JACK vs MYT Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check MYT's competition here
JACK vs GENK Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while GENK trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -102.75. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check GENK's competition here
JACK vs GTIM Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while GTIM trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check GTIM's competition here
JACK vs YOSH Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while YOSH trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check YOSH's competition here
JACK vs REBN Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while REBN trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REBN's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check REBN's competition here
JACK vs BTBDW Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BTBDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BTBDW's competition here
JACK vs PC Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while PC trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check PC's competition here
JACK vs BTBD Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BTBD trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BTBD's competition here
JACK vs BTB Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BTB's competition here
JACK vs FATBV Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check FATBV's competition here
JACK vs CHSN Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while CHSN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check CHSN's competition here
JACK vs PNST Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while PNST trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check PNST's competition here
JACK vs BFI Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BFI's competition here
JACK vs BFIIW Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check BFIIW's competition here
JACK vs ONDR Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check ONDR's competition here
JACK vs LUB Comparison July 2025
JACK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JACK stands at 395M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JACK is priced at $20.92, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JACK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JACK is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACK.Check LUB's competition here