IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
IT Tech Packaging, Inc. ITP Peers
See (ITP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITP | $0.20 | +3.68% | 3.3M | -0.21 | -$0.96 | N/A |
| SUZ | $9.47 | +7.43% | 11.7B | -9.76 | -$0.97 | +0.51% |
| LPX | $92.44 | +0.22% | 6.4B | 16.19 | $5.71 | +1.16% |
| UFPI | $97.41 | +0.36% | 5.9B | 15.94 | $6.11 | +1.40% |
| WFG | $75.65 | +1.37% | 5.8B | -2521.67 | -$0.03 | +1.70% |
| SLVM | $53.19 | +0.13% | 2.2B | 7.81 | $6.81 | +3.36% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| CLW | $29.38 | -0.78% | 477.6M | -6.32 | -$4.65 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.50 | +0.15% | 355.1M | -0.79 | -$8.20 | +6.10% |
Stock Comparison
ITP vs SUZ Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while SUZ trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs LPX Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while LPX trades at $92.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs UFPI Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while UFPI trades at $97.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs WFG Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while WFG trades at $75.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -2521.67. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs SLVM Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while SLVM trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs RFP Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs SWM Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs CLW Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 477.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while CLW trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs MATV Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 355.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while MATV trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs MERC Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while MERC trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs GLT Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs EVA Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs NWGL Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while NWGL trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs JCTCF Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs JCTC Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while JCTC trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs UFS Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs NP Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.
ITP vs VRS Comparison
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.3M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.20, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.