Ideal Power Inc.
Ideal Power Inc. IPWR Peers
See (IPWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPWR | $4.40 | +13.40% | 36.7M | -3.70 | -$1.19 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $123.80 | +1.78% | 47.2B | 71.94 | $1.72 | +0.11% |
| HUBB | $405.26 | +1.55% | 21.6B | 27.38 | $14.80 | +1.28% |
| NVT | $73.13 | +1.57% | 12B | 50.77 | $1.44 | +1.07% |
| AYI | $304.18 | +5.81% | 9.4B | 23.03 | $13.20 | +0.21% |
| BE | $22.33 | +3.38% | 5.2B | 1115.41 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $133.84 | +0.42% | 5B | 67.56 | $1.98 | +0.30% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| ENS | $86.28 | +1.75% | 3.3B | 9.60 | $8.99 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
IPWR vs ABB Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs VRT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while VRT trades at $123.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 71.94. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs HUBB Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while HUBB trades at $405.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs NVT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while NVT trades at $73.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs AYI Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while AYI trades at $304.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs BE Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while BE trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1115.41. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs AEIS Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while AEIS trades at $133.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 67.56. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs WIRE Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ENS Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ENS trades at $86.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs HAYW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while HAYW trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs POWL Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while POWL trades at $199.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ATKR Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ATKR trades at $70.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ENVX Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ENVX trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs HOLI Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ENR Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ENR trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs PLUG Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while PLUG trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs MVST Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while MVST trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs EOSE Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while EOSE trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs EOSEW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 890.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while EOSEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs PLPC Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 790.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while PLPC trades at $159.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ADSE Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 706.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ADSE trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs AMPX-WT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 521.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs AMPX Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while AMPX trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs KE Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 470.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while KE trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SLDP Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 408.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SLDP trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SES-WT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SES-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs LTBR Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while LTBR trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -16.14. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs AIRJ Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while AIRJ trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 52.78. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs EAF Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while EAF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs FREY Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs TE Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while TE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs NVX Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while NVX trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs FCEL Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while FCEL trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SKYX Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SKYX trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ULBI Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ULBI trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ELVA Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ELVA trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -84.25. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ESP Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ESP trades at $45.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs MVSTW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while MVSTW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs NEOV Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while NEOV trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -29.42. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SVT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SVT trades at $47.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.26. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs CBAT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while CBAT trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ADSEW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ADSEW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs OPTT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while OPTT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs RAYA Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while RAYA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -49.50. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs RFIL Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while RFIL trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SLDPW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SLDPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ELPW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ELPW trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs NEOVW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while NEOVW trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs CHEV Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while CHEV trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs APWC Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while APWC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs PPSI Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while PPSI trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs FLUX Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while FLUX trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs OESX Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while OESX trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs GWH Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while GWH trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs CCTG Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while CCTG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SDST Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SDST trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs STI Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while STI trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs PITA Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs GWH-WT Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs NXU Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs POLA Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while POLA trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs DCFC Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs XPON Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while XPON trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs DFLIW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while DFLIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs SDSTW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs DFLI Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while DFLI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs DCFCW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs ENR-PA Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.
IPWR vs BLNKW Comparison
IPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWR stands at 36.7M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWR is priced at $4.40, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWR's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWR is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWR.