Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc. IFS Peers
See (IFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFS | $37.93 | +4.81% | 4.4B | 11.97 | $3.17 | +2.66% |
| USB-PA | $847.00 | -0.05% | 1.4T | 241.31 | $3.51 | +4.37% |
| HDB | $76.92 | +1.26% | 196.7B | 24.04 | $3.20 | +0.85% |
| PNC | $185.51 | +1.64% | 73.4B | 13.12 | $14.14 | +3.45% |
| USB | $45.62 | +1.78% | 71.1B | 11.29 | $4.04 | +4.37% |
| MFG | $5.60 | +1.63% | 70.3B | 11.67 | $0.48 | +2.40% |
| USB-PS | $18.73 | +0.48% | 68.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.37% |
| USB-PP | $22.78 | +0.35% | 68.3B | 4.91 | $4.64 | +4.37% |
| ITUB | $6.60 | +0.15% | 67.7B | 9.30 | $0.71 | +6.31% |
| USB-PH | $20.24 | -0.15% | 66.5B | 4.36 | $4.64 | +4.37% |
Stock Comparison
IFS vs USB-PA Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB-PA trades at $847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 241.31. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HDB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HDB trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs PNC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while PNC trades at $185.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs USB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB trades at $45.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs MFG Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while MFG trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs USB-PS Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB-PS trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs USB-PP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB-PP trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs ITUB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while ITUB trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs USB-PH Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB-PH trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs LYG Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while LYG trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs IBN Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while IBN trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs DB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while DB trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs TFC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while TFC trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -223.84. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BSBR Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BSBR trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HBANL Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HBANL trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HBANM Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HBANM trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs MTB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while MTB trades at $193.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BBDO Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BBDO trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs KB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while KB trades at $81.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BBD Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BBD trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs TFC-PO Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while TFC-PO trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FITB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FITB trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs TFC-PI Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while TFC-PI trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FCNCA Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FCNCA trades at $1,959.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HBANP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HBANP trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs USB-PR Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB-PR trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FCNCO Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FCNCO trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs TFC-PR Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while TFC-PR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FCNCP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FCNCP trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HBAN Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HBAN trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs USB-PQ Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while USB-PQ trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs RF-PF Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while RF-PF trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs SHG Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while SHG trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs RF Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while RF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs RF-PC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while RF-PC trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CFG Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CFG trades at $44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs KEY Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while KEY trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -90.34. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs KEY-PK Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while KEY-PK trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BAP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BAP trades at $223.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs KEY-PI Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while KEY-PI trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs KEY-PJ Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs KEY-PL Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while KEY-PL trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FITBI Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FITBI trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FITBP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FITBP trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs RF-PE Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while RF-PE trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BCH Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BCH trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CFG-PD Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs VLYPN Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while VLYPN trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FITBO Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FITBO trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FHN-PB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FHN-PB trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FHN-PC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FHN-PC trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs WF Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while WF trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CFG-PH Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CFG-PH trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FHN-PE Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FHN-PE trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CIB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CIB trades at $45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BSAC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BSAC trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FHN Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FHN trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs SSB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while SSB trades at $91.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs WBS Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while WBS trades at $54.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FHN-PD Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CUBI-PE Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CUBI-PE trades at $280.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FHN-PF Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FHN-PF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs WAL Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while WAL trades at $77.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs PNFP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while PNFP trades at $109.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs WTFC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while WTFC trades at $124.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CBSH Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CBSH trades at $62.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CFR Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CFR trades at $128.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CFG-PE Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CFG-PE trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs WTFCM Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while WTFCM trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs UMBF Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while UMBF trades at $106.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs ONB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while ONB trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CMA Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CMA trades at $59.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs ONBPO Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while ONBPO trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs ONBPP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while ONBPP trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs ZION Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while ZION trades at $51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BPOP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BPOP trades at $110.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BSMX Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs SNV Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while SNV trades at $51.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs GGAL Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while GGAL trades at $51.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs SNV-PD Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while SNV-PD trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs PB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while PB trades at $70.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BOKF Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BOKF trades at $97.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs CADE Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while CADE trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HOMB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HOMB trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs OZK Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while OZK trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BXS Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FNB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FNB trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs UBSI Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while UBSI trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FFIN Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FFIN trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs VLY Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while VLY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs GBCI Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while GBCI trades at $43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs COLB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while COLB trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HWC Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HWC trades at $57.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs VLYPP Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while VLYPP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs VLYPO Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while VLYPO trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs HWCPZ Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while HWCPZ trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs BMA Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while BMA trades at $71.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is -83.41. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs FLG Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while FLG trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.
IFS vs AUB Comparison
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $37.93, while AUB trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.97, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.