Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.48B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 84.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while VCISF trades at $149.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to VCISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 80.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ACSAY trades at $12.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 79.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while VCISY trades at $35.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 79.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BOUYY trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, LTOUF has a market cap of 53.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while LTOUF trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas LTOUF's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to LTOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to LTOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 48.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PWR trades at $326.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 52.71. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 24.54B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WSPOF trades at $188.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 48.21. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 19.71B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while EME trades at $440.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 17.84B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CRWOF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while FIX trades at $439.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, J has a market cap of 14.77B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while J trades at $122.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas J's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 14.48B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ACSAF trades at $56.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ACSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while HOCFF trades at $190.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to HOCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ACM trades at $104.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 13.79B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BOUYF trades at $36.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.88B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to EFGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while EFGSY trades at $27.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 12.34B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while APG trades at $43.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 72.03. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 11.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MTZ trades at $147.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 54.30. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while OBYCF trades at $15.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KAJMY trades at $23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 10.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while STN trades at $93.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KAJMF trades at $20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while STBBF trades at $83.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to STBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.35B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TTEK trades at $34.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TISCY trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SNCAF trades at $52.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to SNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SKBSY trades at $21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BLD trades at $290.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to AVHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ACXIF trades at $149.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SKSBF trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to SKSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KBR trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TISCF trades at $37.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to TISCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BCKIF trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CCOHF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while FLR trades at $35.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BCKIY trades at $11.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BCKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while STRL trades at $179.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while DY trades at $186.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ROAD trades at $92.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 87.24. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while IESC trades at $250.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SHMUY trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 61.64. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ARCAY trades at $49.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PUODY trades at $223.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PUODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to RBWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ARCVF trades at $46.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while NWSGY trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while IMPJY trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while NWSZF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PRIM trades at $68.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while GVA trades at $82.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to PYYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BAFBF trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to BAFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BFLBF trades at $83.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while OPMXF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 96.17. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BFLBY trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BFLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SENGF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ECG trades at $48.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MYRG trades at $155.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 71.78. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AGX trades at $170.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while JGCCY trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to JGCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to PNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TPC trades at $29.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to AGRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TNISY trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while LMB trades at $119.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TNISF trades at $17.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to TNISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KLRGF trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while NVEE trades at $19.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KBAGF trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to KBAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 984.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BADFF trades at $28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to BADFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 952.58M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BIRDF trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BIRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.42M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to CKOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 933.98M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to MOPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.08M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 825.52M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ELWSF trades at $62.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -33.66. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 818.10M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AEGXF trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 786.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KIERF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 712.68M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while GLDD trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 692.58M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AMRC trades at $13.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.55M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while YITYY trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to YITYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 588.01M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WLDN trades at $40.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.76M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to RNWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 558.98M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.84M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 554.89M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SLAAF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.28M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.37M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to CHYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473.11M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 428.23M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BWMN trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 145.29. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.91M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 376.83M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MTRX trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 350.67M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BBCP trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 303.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ORN trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 76.80. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.33M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 279.31M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BRAGF trades at $6.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 258.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CSGQF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to CSGQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 224.89M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while RITR trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.28M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.85M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AENZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 170.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SLND trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.80M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while DBMG trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to DBMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 164.89M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ESOA trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 143.85M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 142.36M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while JUNE trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -137.12. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.65M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 96.65M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MIMI trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MIMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 91.27M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BRANF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to BRANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 85.93M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BLNK trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 85.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while VATE trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 61.17M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SHIM trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SHIM's ROE of -71.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 53.52M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AGFY trades at $27.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -5.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to KNNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 44.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MSW trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 39.54M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ONEG trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ONEG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 37.73M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while APEUF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to APEUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.92M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 34.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while BILBF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to BILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MLLUY trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MURSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to MURSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 21.55M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while FGL trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -18.20. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 16.24M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MRCR trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to MRCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 13.73M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WXM trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PGHL trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to LOUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.72M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.14M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while FBGL trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to FBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6.95M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SUNE trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.64M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while COLDF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 6.19M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while GRHI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 3.39M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WLGS trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WLGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to ETWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CIPI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SODE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to SODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PMDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PMDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while RELT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to RELT's ROE of +8.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, EFTI has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while EFTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas EFTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to EFTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to EFTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, PRKV has a market cap of 662925.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while PRKV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas PRKV's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to PRKV's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to PRKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, RIII has a market cap of 421413.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while RIII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas RIII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to RIII's ROE of +236.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to RIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, CCGM has a market cap of 200400.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while CCGM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas CCGM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to CCGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to CCGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, JNSH has a market cap of 163083.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while JNSH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas JNSH's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to JNSH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to JNSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, GNSPF has a market cap of 90093.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while GNSPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas GNSPF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to GNSPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to GNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, DLOC has a market cap of 73377.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while DLOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas DLOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to DLOC's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to DLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, FRCN has a market cap of 59926.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while FRCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas FRCN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to FRCN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to FRCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, VICT has a market cap of 23086.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while VICT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas VICT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to VICT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to VICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WAXS has a market cap of 7339.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WAXS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WAXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WAXS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WAXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ARME has a market cap of 4517.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ARME trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ARME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ARME's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to ARME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, WLMSQ has a market cap of 2721.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while WLMSQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas WLMSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to WLMSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to WLMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, NSMG has a market cap of 2467.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while NSMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas NSMG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to NSMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to NSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, TSNI has a market cap of 1458.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while TSNI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas TSNI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to TSNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to TSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, AMLC has a market cap of 433.00. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while AMLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas AMLC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to AMLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to AMLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SKK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SKK trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IEA has daily volatility of 0.94 and SKK has daily volatility of N/A.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, SKBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while SKBL trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to SKBL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IEA has daily volatility of 0.94 and SKBL has daily volatility of N/A.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, MCDIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while MCDIF trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas MCDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to MCDIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is less volatile compared to MCDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, HIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.

IEA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IEA stands at N/A. In comparison, ATCX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IEA is priced at $13.72, while ATCX trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IEA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.97, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, IEA's ROE is +4.73%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEA is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEA.