Hill International, Inc.
Hill International, Inc. HIL Peers
See (HIL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIL | $3.40 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PWR | $344.89 | +1.33% | 51.11B | 55.72 | $6.19 | +0.11% |
| EME | $470.59 | +1.36% | 21.06B | 20.81 | $22.61 | +0.21% |
| FIX | $472.16 | +1.90% | 16.66B | 28.37 | $16.64 | +0.32% |
| J | $129.14 | +0.26% | 15.52B | 42.62 | $3.03 | +0.88% |
| ACM | $109.40 | +1.03% | 14.47B | 23.43 | $4.67 | +0.88% |
| APG | $45.89 | +0.24% | 12.89B | 75.23 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MTZ | $157.77 | +1.39% | 12.45B | 58.00 | $2.72 | N/A |
| STN | $101.33 | +1.80% | 11.56B | 41.87 | $2.42 | +0.60% |
| TTEK | $35.37 | +0.54% | 9.32B | 51.26 | $0.69 | +0.65% |
Stock Comparison
HIL vs PWR Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 51.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while PWR trades at $344.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 55.72. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs EME Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 21.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while EME trades at $470.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs FIX Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 16.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while FIX trades at $472.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs J Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while J trades at $129.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas J's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ACM Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 14.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ACM trades at $109.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs APG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 12.89B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while APG trades at $45.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 75.23. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs MTZ Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 12.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while MTZ trades at $157.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs STN Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 11.56B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while STN trades at $101.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 41.87. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs TTEK Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while TTEK trades at $35.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs BLD Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while BLD trades at $304.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs KBR Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while KBR trades at $56.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs FLR Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while FLR trades at $38.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs STRL Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 5.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while STRL trades at $188.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ROAD Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ROAD trades at $101.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 87.19. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs DY Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while DY trades at $194.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs IESC Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 5.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while IESC trades at $270.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs PRIM Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while PRIM trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs GVA Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while GVA trades at $87.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ECG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ECG trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs AGX Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while AGX trades at $188.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs MYRG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while MYRG trades at $164.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 89.92. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs TPC Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while TPC trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs LMB Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while LMB trades at $125.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs NVEE Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while NVEE trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs AMRC Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 785.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while AMRC trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs GLDD Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 760.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while GLDD trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs WLDN Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 704.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while WLDN trades at $48.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs BWMN Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 453.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while BWMN trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 154.71. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs BBCP Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 376.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while BBCP trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs MTRX Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 352.59M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while MTRX trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ORN Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 342.93M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ORN trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 86.70. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs RITR Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 224.27M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while RITR trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs AENZ Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AENZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs SLND Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 170.60M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while SLND trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs JUNE Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 142.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while JUNE trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ESOA Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 140.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ESOA trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs CSLRW Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs MIMI Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 115.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while MIMI trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 168.00. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs OEG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs VATE Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 80.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while VATE trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs BLNK Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 76.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while BLNK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs MSW Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 64.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while MSW trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs SHIM Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 61.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while SHIM trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs AGFY Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 56.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while AGFY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ONEG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 42.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ONEG trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONEG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs DRTT Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs PGHL Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.38M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs FGL Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 21.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while FGL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs WXM Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 13.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while WXM trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs WLMS Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.72M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs FBGL Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.76M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while FBGL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs SUNE Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while SUNE trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs ENG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs WLGS Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 5.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while WLGS trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WLGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.
HIL vs OIG Comparison
HIL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIL stands at N/A. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HIL is priced at $3.40, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HIL is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIL.