Hagerty, Inc.
Hagerty, Inc. HGTY-WT Peers
See (HGTY-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGTY-WT | $2.10 | +5.00% | 3.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PGR | $261.78 | +0.56% | 153.5B | 17.74 | $14.76 | +1.88% |
| CB | $283.75 | +0.57% | 113.7B | 13.67 | $20.76 | +1.31% |
| TRV | $265.08 | +0.07% | 60.1B | 14.34 | $18.48 | +1.60% |
| ALL-PH | $20.65 | +0.15% | 51.9B | 3.38 | $6.11 | +1.96% |
| ALL | $195.35 | -0.16% | 51.7B | 13.34 | $14.64 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PB | $26.22 | -0.19% | 51.7B | 2.18 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | N/A | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| WRB-PF | $19.57 | +0.81% | 28.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.92% |
| WRB-PE | $21.88 | +1.20% | 28.2B | 4.76 | $4.60 | +1.92% |
Stock Comparison
HGTY-WT vs PGR Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while PGR trades at $261.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs CB Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while CB trades at $283.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs TRV Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while TRV trades at $265.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ALL-PH Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ALL-PH trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ALL Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ALL trades at $195.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ALL-PB Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ALL-PB trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ALL-PG Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs WRB-PF Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while WRB-PF trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs WRB-PE Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while WRB-PE trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs WRB-PH Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while WRB-PH trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs WRB Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while WRB trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs WRB-PG Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while WRB-PG trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs MKL Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while MKL trades at $1,961.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs CINF Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while CINF trades at $145.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs L Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while L trades at $89.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs CNA Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while CNA trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs KNSL Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while KNSL trades at $476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AFGC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AFGC trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AFGB Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AFGB trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AFGE Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AFGE trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AFG Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AFG trades at $123.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AFGD Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AFGD trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AXS Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AXS trades at $102.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AXS-PE Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AXS-PE trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ALL-PJ Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs RLI Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while RLI trades at $72.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs THG Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while THG trades at $168.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs SIGI Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while SIGI trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ALL-PI Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ALL-PI trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs WTM Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while WTM trades at $1,747.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 163.13. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs PLMR Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while PLMR trades at $155.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs KMPB Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while KMPB trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs KMPR Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while KMPR trades at $63.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs MCY Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while MCY trades at $64.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs LMND Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while LMND trades at $44.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AHL Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AHL trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs SKWD Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while SKWD trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ROOT Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ROOT trades at $138.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AHL-PE Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AHL-PE trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -81.89. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs STC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while STC trades at $62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs HMN Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while HMN trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs HCI Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while HCI trades at $147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs MHLA Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while MHLA trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs BOW Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while BOW trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AHL-PD Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AHL-PD trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -81.56. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs PRA Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while PRA trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs SAFT Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while SAFT trades at $77.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ARGO Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs SIGIP Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while SIGIP trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs HGTY Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 893.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while HGTY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 46.90. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs DGICB Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 778.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while DGICB trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs UVE Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 742.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while UVE trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs UFCS Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 727.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while UFCS trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs HRTG Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 696.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while HRTG trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs DGICA Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 676M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while DGICA trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ACIC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ACIC trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs GBLI Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 464.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while GBLI trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs UIHC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AII Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 326.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AII trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs NODK Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while NODK trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs CNFRZ Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while CNFRZ trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs KINS Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while KINS trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs CNFR Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while CNFR trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs UNAM Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs HALL Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs ARGO-PA Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 326. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs STFC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs Y Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AFHBL Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs NSEC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs AHL-PC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs MILEW Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs MILE Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.
HGTY-WT vs FNHC Comparison
HGTY-WT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTY-WT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGTY-WT is priced at $2.10, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HGTY-WT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTY-WT is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTY-WT.