The Gap, Inc.
The Gap, Inc. GPS Peers
See (GPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.21B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +1.22% |
| TJX | $130.81 | -0.52% | 146.05B | 30.71 | $4.26 | +1.14% |
| ROST | $149.33 | +0.05% | 49.10B | 23.63 | $6.32 | +1.01% |
| LULU | $310.61 | +2.11% | 35.73B | 21.22 | $14.64 | N/A |
| ONON | $57.40 | +11.87% | 18.59B | 63.78 | $0.90 | N/A |
| BURL | $261.11 | +0.61% | 16.45B | 33.52 | $7.79 | N/A |
| GAP | $25.39 | +2.38% | 9.56B | 11.54 | $2.20 | +2.43% |
| URBN | $59.33 | +3.62% | 5.50B | 13.93 | $4.26 | N/A |
| BOOT | $134.97 | +1.25% | 4.13B | 24.06 | $5.61 | N/A |
| ANF | $81.42 | +4.16% | 3.88B | 7.62 | $10.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GPS vs TJX Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 146.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while TJX trades at $130.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs ROST Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 49.10B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while ROST trades at $149.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs LULU Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 35.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while LULU trades at $310.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs ONON Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 18.59B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while ONON trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 63.78. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs BURL Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 16.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while BURL trades at $261.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs GAP Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while GAP trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs URBN Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while URBN trades at $59.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs BOOT Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while BOOT trades at $134.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs ANF Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while ANF trades at $81.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs AEO Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while AEO trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs BKE Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while BKE trades at $39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs VSCO Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while VSCO trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs CRI Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while CRI trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs FL Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while FL trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas FL's P/E ratio is 70.11. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs HIBB Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs CHS Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs GES Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 629.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while GES trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs CURV Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 605.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while CURV trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs SFIX Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 571.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while SFIX trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs SCVL Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 528.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while SCVL trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs GCO Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 263.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while GCO trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -13.26. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs ZUMZ Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 261.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while ZUMZ trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -148.44. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs JILL Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 256.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while JILL trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs CTRN Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 201.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while CTRN trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs DBI Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 182.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while DBI trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs PLCE Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 141.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while PLCE trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs DLTH Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 65.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while DLTH trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs DXLG Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 59.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while DXLG trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DXLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs CATO Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 53.10M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while CATO trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs BIRD Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 44.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while BIRD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs DBGI Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 33.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while DBGI trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -11.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs DBGIW Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -11.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs TLYS Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 27.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while TLYS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs RENT Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 21.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while RENT trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs LVLU Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 17.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while LVLU trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.
GPS vs EXPR Comparison
GPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPS stands at 9.21B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.11M. Regarding current trading prices, GPS is priced at $24.55, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.64, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GPS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EXPR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GPS is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPS.