American Financial Group
American Financial Group (GFZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFZ | $25.38 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CB | $333.39 | +0.53% | 131.2B | 12.99 | $25.67 | +1.16% |
| PGR | $203.69 | -0.19% | 119.5B | 10.60 | $19.22 | +6.83% |
| TRV | $305.39 | +0.15% | 68.1B | 11.13 | $27.44 | +1.44% |
| ALL-PB | $26.26 | -0.04% | 54.7B | 2.18 | $12.04 | +1.94% |
| ALL | $206.16 | -0.10% | 54B | 5.42 | $38.05 | +1.94% |
| ALL-PH | $21.25 | -0.47% | 52.9B | 3.34 | $6.36 | +1.94% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.94% |
| WRB | $71.00 | -0.11% | 27B | 15.96 | $4.45 | +2.61% |
| MKL | $2,066.61 | -0.75% | 26.1B | 12.21 | $169.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFZ vs CB Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while CB trades at $333.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check CB's competition here
GFZ vs PGR Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while PGR trades at $203.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check PGR's competition here
GFZ vs TRV Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while TRV trades at $305.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check TRV's competition here
GFZ vs ALL-PB Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ALL-PB trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ALL-PB's competition here
GFZ vs ALL Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ALL trades at $206.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ALL's competition here
GFZ vs ALL-PH Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ALL-PH trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ALL-PH's competition here
GFZ vs ALL-PG Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ and ALL-PG have similar daily volatility (0.08).Check ALL-PG's competition here
GFZ vs WRB Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while WRB trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check WRB's competition here
GFZ vs MKL Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while MKL trades at $2,066.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check MKL's competition here
GFZ vs CINF Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while CINF trades at $160.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check CINF's competition here
GFZ vs L Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while L trades at $108.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check L's competition here
GFZ vs CNA Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while CNA trades at $46.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check CNA's competition here
GFZ vs AFG Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AFG trades at $129.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AFG's competition here
GFZ vs WRB-PE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while WRB-PE trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check WRB-PE's competition here
GFZ vs KNSL Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while KNSL trades at $372.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check KNSL's competition here
GFZ vs AXS Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AXS trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AXS's competition here
GFZ vs WRB-PF Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while WRB-PF trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check WRB-PF's competition here
GFZ vs AXS-PE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AXS-PE trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AXS-PE's competition here
GFZ vs ALL-PJ Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
GFZ vs WRB-PG Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while WRB-PG trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check WRB-PG's competition here
GFZ vs WRB-PH Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while WRB-PH trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check WRB-PH's competition here
GFZ vs THG Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while THG trades at $173.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check THG's competition here
GFZ vs RLI Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while RLI trades at $60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check RLI's competition here
GFZ vs WTM Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while WTM trades at $2,189.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check WTM's competition here
GFZ vs ALL-PI Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ALL-PI trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ALL-PI's competition here
GFZ vs SIGI Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while SIGI trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check SIGI's competition here
GFZ vs MCY Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while MCY trades at $83.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check MCY's competition here
GFZ vs HGTY Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while HGTY trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check HGTY's competition here
GFZ vs LMND Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while LMND trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -21.31. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check LMND's competition here
GFZ vs HGTY-WT Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
GFZ vs AHL Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AHL's competition here
GFZ vs PLMR Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while PLMR trades at $120.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check PLMR's competition here
GFZ vs AHL-PD Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AHL-PD trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -84.96. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AHL-PD's competition here
GFZ vs SLDE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while SLDE trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check SLDE's competition here
GFZ vs HCI Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while HCI trades at $153.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check HCI's competition here
GFZ vs STC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while STC trades at $66.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check STC's competition here
GFZ vs SKWD Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while SKWD trades at $47.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check SKWD's competition here
GFZ vs AHL-PE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AHL-PE trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.77. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AHL-PE's competition here
GFZ vs AFGB Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AFGB trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AFGB's competition here
GFZ vs KMPR Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while KMPR trades at $30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check KMPR's competition here
GFZ vs AFGD Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AFGD trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AFGD's competition here
GFZ vs HMN Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while HMN trades at $42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check HMN's competition here
GFZ vs AFGC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AFGC trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AFGC's competition here
GFZ vs AFGE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AFGE trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AFGE's competition here
GFZ vs KMPB Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while KMPB trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check KMPB's competition here
GFZ vs PRA Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while PRA trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check PRA's competition here
GFZ vs SAFT Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while SAFT trades at $77.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check SAFT's competition here
GFZ vs MHLA Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while MHLA trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MHLA's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check MHLA's competition here
GFZ vs ASIC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ASIC trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ASIC's competition here
GFZ vs ARGO Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ARGO's competition here
GFZ vs SIGIP Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while SIGIP trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check SIGIP's competition here
GFZ vs UFCS Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 970.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while UFCS trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check UFCS's competition here
GFZ vs UVE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while UVE trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check UVE's competition here
GFZ vs BOW Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while BOW trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check BOW's competition here
GFZ vs ROOT Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 744.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ROOT trades at $54.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ROOT's competition here
GFZ vs HRTG Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 725.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while HRTG trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check HRTG's competition here
GFZ vs DGICA Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 618.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while DGICA trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check DGICA's competition here
GFZ vs DGICB Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 567.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while DGICB trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check DGICB's competition here
GFZ vs ACIC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 521.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ACIC trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ACIC's competition here
GFZ vs GBLI Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while GBLI trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check GBLI's competition here
GFZ vs AII Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 346.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AII trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AII's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AII's competition here
GFZ vs UIHC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check UIHC's competition here
GFZ vs NODK Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while NODK trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 122.27. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check NODK's competition here
GFZ vs PRHIZ Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while PRHIZ trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check PRHIZ's competition here
GFZ vs KINS Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while KINS trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check KINS's competition here
GFZ vs CNFR Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CNFR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check CNFR's competition here
GFZ vs CNFRZ Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check CNFRZ's competition here
GFZ vs PRHI Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while PRHI trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PRHI's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check PRHI's competition here
GFZ vs UNAM Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check UNAM's competition here
GFZ vs HALL Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check HALL's competition here
GFZ vs ARGO-PA Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
GFZ vs AHL-PC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AHL-PC's competition here
GFZ vs FNHC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check FNHC's competition here
GFZ vs AFHBL Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check AFHBL's competition here
GFZ vs STFC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check STFC's competition here
GFZ vs MILE Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check MILE's competition here
GFZ vs NSEC Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check NSEC's competition here
GFZ vs Y Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check Y's competition here
GFZ vs MILEW Comparison February 2026
GFZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFZ stands at 0. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFZ is priced at $25.38, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFZ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFZ is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFZ.Check MILEW's competition here