Guess', Inc.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, IDEXF has a market cap of 167.55B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while IDEXF trades at $53.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas IDEXF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEXF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to IDEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, IDEXY has a market cap of 163.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while IDEXY trades at $26.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas IDEXY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEXY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to IDEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 143.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while TJX trades at $128.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, FRCOY has a market cap of 102.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while FRCOY trades at $33.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FRCOY's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRCOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to FRCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, FRCOF has a market cap of 100.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while FRCOF trades at $328.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FRCOF's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to FRCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 46.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ROST trades at $142.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 32.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while LULU trades at $279.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, NXGPY has a market cap of 19.39B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while NXGPY trades at $83.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NXGPY's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXGPY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to NXGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, NXGPF has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while NXGPF trades at $145.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NXGPF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXGPF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to NXGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.01B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ONON trades at $49.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 15.07B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BURL trades at $239.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.21B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while GPS trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 8.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while GAP trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while URBN trades at $51.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, AMKYF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while AMKYF trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas AMKYF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMKYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to AMKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ATZAF has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ATZAF trades at $42.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ATZAF's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATZAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to ATZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, SHAOF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while SHAOF trades at $51.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SHAOF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHAOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to SHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BOOT trades at $117.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ANF trades at $73.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, MRPLY has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while MRPLY trades at $13.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MRPLY's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRPLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to MRPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, TPSRF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while TPSRF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TPSRF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPSRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to TPSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, MRPZF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while MRPZF trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MRPZF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRPZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to MRPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while AEO trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BKE trades at $36.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, XTEPY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while XTEPY trades at $63.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas XTEPY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XTEPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to XTEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, XTPEF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while XTPEF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas XTPEF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XTPEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to XTPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while VSCO trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CRI trades at $34.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, RTALF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while RTALF trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RTALF's P/E ratio is -105.76. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTALF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to RTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while FL trades at $12.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FL's P/E ratio is 63.26. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while HIBB trades at $87.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CHS trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BZTAF has a market cap of 638.54M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BZTAF trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BZTAF's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZTAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BZTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BOZTY has a market cap of 573.22M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BOZTY trades at $9.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BOZTY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOZTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to BOZTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 567.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CURV trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 488.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while SCVL trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 449.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while SFIX trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CCCHF has a market cap of 355.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CCCHF trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CCCHF's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCCHF's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CCCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, GRDZF has a market cap of 296.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while GRDZF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GRDZF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GRDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 243.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while JILL trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 235.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ZUMZ trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -133.89. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 233.52M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while GCO trades at $21.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, SYHLF has a market cap of 222.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while SYHLF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SYHLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to SYHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 189.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CTRN trades at $22.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 160.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while DBI trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 125.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while PLCE trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, GLFGF has a market cap of 115.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while GLFGF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GLFGF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLFGF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GLFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ESHDF has a market cap of 84.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ESHDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ESHDF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESHDF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ESHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, RROTF has a market cap of 82.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while RROTF trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RROTF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RROTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to RROTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, RTMNF has a market cap of 79.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while RTMNF trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RTMNF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTMNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to RTMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, RTMAF has a market cap of 73.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while RTMAF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RTMAF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to RTMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 67.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while DLTH trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 53.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while DXLG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DXLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 50.52M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CATO trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ESPGY has a market cap of 44.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ESPGY trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ESPGY's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESPGY's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ESPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 42.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BIRD trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 34.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while DBGI trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -11.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ENMHF has a market cap of 33.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ENMHF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ENMHF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENMHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ENMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 32.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while TLYS trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -11.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while LVLU trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 16.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while RENT trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, IVDN has a market cap of 12.26M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while IVDN trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas IVDN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVDN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to IVDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, BEBE has a market cap of 9.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while BEBE trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BEBE's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEBE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BEBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.11M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while EXPR trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, FBCD has a market cap of 507463.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while FBCD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FBCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBCD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to FBCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, PRVU has a market cap of 43882.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while PRVU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas PRVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRVU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to PRVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CBKCQ has a market cap of 3855.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CBKCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CBKCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBKCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to CBKCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, CACH has a market cap of 3104.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while CACH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CACH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CACH's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CACH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, DESTQ has a market cap of 2133.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while DESTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DESTQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DESTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to DESTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, ATAR has a market cap of 1033.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while ATAR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ATAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ATAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 593.02M. In comparison, EXPRQ has a market cap of 749.00. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $11.44, while EXPRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas EXPRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPRQ's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to EXPRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.