First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FWRG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWRG | $17.28 | +1.53% | 1.1B | 101.65 | $0.17 | N/A |
| MCD | $298.47 | +1.35% | 213.4B | 26.32 | $11.34 | +2.35% |
| SBUX | $94.42 | +0.77% | 107.3B | 34.33 | $2.75 | +2.55% |
| CMG | $46.76 | +2.23% | 63B | 41.38 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $146.70 | +0.60% | 40.8B | 29.23 | $5.02 | +1.88% |
| DRI | $204.48 | +0.83% | 23.9B | 23.03 | $8.88 | +2.79% |
| QSR | $69.56 | -0.66% | 22.8B | 23.59 | $2.95 | +3.45% |
| YUMC | $47.85 | -1.80% | 17.9B | 20.02 | $2.39 | +1.67% |
| DPZ | $485.53 | +1.93% | 16.5B | 28.16 | $17.24 | +1.34% |
| TXRH | $188.14 | +2.14% | 12.5B | 29.05 | $6.48 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
FWRG vs MCD Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while MCD trades at $298.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check MCD's competition here
FWRG vs SBUX Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while SBUX trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check SBUX's competition here
FWRG vs CMG Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CMG trades at $46.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CMG's competition here
FWRG vs YUM Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while YUM trades at $146.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check YUM's competition here
FWRG vs DRI Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while DRI trades at $204.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check DRI's competition here
FWRG vs QSR Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while QSR trades at $69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check QSR's competition here
FWRG vs YUMC Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while YUMC trades at $47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check YUMC's competition here
FWRG vs DPZ Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while DPZ trades at $485.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check DPZ's competition here
FWRG vs TXRH Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while TXRH trades at $188.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check TXRH's competition here
FWRG vs BROS Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BROS trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 152.56. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BROS's competition here
FWRG vs CAVA Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CAVA trades at $88.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 73.32. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CAVA's competition here
FWRG vs WING Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while WING trades at $302.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 50.59. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check WING's competition here
FWRG vs EAT Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while EAT trades at $153.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check EAT's competition here
FWRG vs SHAK Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while SHAK trades at $137.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 473.38. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check SHAK's competition here
FWRG vs CAKE Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CAKE trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CAKE's competition here
FWRG vs WEN Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while WEN trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check WEN's competition here
FWRG vs SG Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while SG trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check SG's competition here
FWRG vs ARCO Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while ARCO trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check ARCO's competition here
FWRG vs CBRL Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CBRL trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CBRL's competition here
FWRG vs PZZA Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while PZZA trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check PZZA's competition here
FWRG vs CNNE Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CNNE trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CNNE's competition here
FWRG vs HDL Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while HDL trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check HDL's competition here
FWRG vs KRUS Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while KRUS trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -110.20. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check KRUS's competition here
FWRG vs BH-A Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BH-A trades at $1,561.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BH-A's competition here
FWRG vs BH Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 977.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BH trades at $319.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BH's competition here
FWRG vs BJRI Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 861.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BJRI trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BJRI's competition here
FWRG vs TWNPV Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check TWNPV's competition here
FWRG vs BLMN Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 854.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BLMN trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BLMN's competition here
FWRG vs RUTH Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check RUTH's competition here
FWRG vs PTLO Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 678M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while PTLO trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check PTLO's competition here
FWRG vs CHUY Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CHUY's competition here
FWRG vs VENU Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while VENU trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check VENU's competition here
FWRG vs TAST Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check TAST's competition here
FWRG vs JACK Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while JACK trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check JACK's competition here
FWRG vs NATH Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while NATH trades at $95.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check NATH's competition here
FWRG vs DIN Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while DIN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check DIN's competition here
FWRG vs PBPB Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while PBPB trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check PBPB's competition here
FWRG vs RICK Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while RICK trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check RICK's competition here
FWRG vs LOCO Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 323.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while LOCO trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check LOCO's competition here
FWRG vs TWNP Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 267.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while TWNP trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check TWNP's competition here
FWRG vs MB Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 237.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while MB trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check MB's competition here
FWRG vs FRGI Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FRGI's competition here
FWRG vs DENN Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 214.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while DENN trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check DENN's competition here
FWRG vs BBQ Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BBQ's competition here
FWRG vs RRGB Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while RRGB trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check RRGB's competition here
FWRG vs STKS Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while STKS trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check STKS's competition here
FWRG vs THCHW Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check THCHW's competition here
FWRG vs THCH Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while THCH trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check THCH's competition here
FWRG vs BDL Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BDL trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BDL's competition here
FWRG vs GRIL Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check GRIL's competition here
FWRG vs FATAV Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FATAV's competition here
FWRG vs FATBW Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FATBW's competition here
FWRG vs FATBP Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FATBP trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FATBP's competition here
FWRG vs FAT Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FAT trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FAT's competition here
FWRG vs NDLS Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while NDLS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check NDLS's competition here
FWRG vs FATBB Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FATBB trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FATBB's competition here
FWRG vs RAVE Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while RAVE trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check RAVE's competition here
FWRG vs ARKR Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while ARKR trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check ARKR's competition here
FWRG vs MYT Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check MYT's competition here
FWRG vs GENK Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while GENK trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -103.87. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check GENK's competition here
FWRG vs GTIM Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while GTIM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check GTIM's competition here
FWRG vs REBN Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while REBN trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REBN's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check REBN's competition here
FWRG vs YOSH Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while YOSH trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check YOSH's competition here
FWRG vs PC Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while PC trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check PC's competition here
FWRG vs BTBD Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BTBD trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BTBD's competition here
FWRG vs BTBDW Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BTBDW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BTBDW's competition here
FWRG vs BTB Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BTB's competition here
FWRG vs FATBV Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check FATBV's competition here
FWRG vs CHSN Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while CHSN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check CHSN's competition here
FWRG vs PNST Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check PNST's competition here
FWRG vs BFI Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BFI's competition here
FWRG vs BFIIW Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check BFIIW's competition here
FWRG vs ONDR Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check ONDR's competition here
FWRG vs LUB Comparison July 2025
FWRG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRG stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWRG is priced at $17.28, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRG currently has a P/E ratio of 101.65, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRG is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRG.Check LUB's competition here