Forward Air Corporation
Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FWRD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWRD | $30.79 | -0.77% | 936.7M | -1.05 | -$29.27 | N/A |
| UPS | $87.18 | -4.03% | 73.9B | 12.97 | $6.72 | +7.46% |
| FDX | $223.86 | -4.55% | 52.8B | 13.32 | $16.80 | +2.49% |
| ZTO | $19.98 | +1.42% | 16.1B | 12.57 | $1.59 | +3.49% |
| XPO | $132.29 | -1.61% | 15.6B | 40.72 | $3.25 | N/A |
| EXPD | $111.37 | -2.70% | 15.2B | 18.49 | $6.02 | +1.35% |
| JBHT | $143.87 | -1.98% | 13.9B | 26.11 | $5.51 | +1.21% |
| CHRW | $97.65 | -2.14% | 11.6B | 23.31 | $4.19 | +2.55% |
| GXO | $49.78 | -3.49% | 5.7B | 80.24 | $0.62 | N/A |
| LSTR | $133.37 | -3.30% | 4.7B | 26.46 | $5.04 | +2.59% |
Stock Comparison
FWRD vs UPS Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while UPS trades at $87.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check UPS's competition here
FWRD vs FDX Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while FDX trades at $223.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check FDX's competition here
FWRD vs ZTO Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while ZTO trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ZTO's competition here
FWRD vs XPO Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while XPO trades at $132.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check XPO's competition here
FWRD vs EXPD Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while EXPD trades at $111.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check EXPD's competition here
FWRD vs JBHT Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while JBHT trades at $143.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check JBHT's competition here
FWRD vs CHRW Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while CHRW trades at $97.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CHRW's competition here
FWRD vs GXO Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while GXO trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check GXO's competition here
FWRD vs LSTR Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while LSTR trades at $133.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check LSTR's competition here
FWRD vs HUBG Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while HUBG trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check HUBG's competition here
FWRD vs PBI Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while PBI trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check PBI's competition here
FWRD vs AIRTP Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 445.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while AIRTP trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 55.09. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check AIRTP's competition here
FWRD vs CYRX Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while CYRX trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CYRX's competition here
FWRD vs RLGT Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while RLGT trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check RLGT's competition here
FWRD vs PAL Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while PAL trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -89.87. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check PAL's competition here
FWRD vs CRGO Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while CRGO trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CRGO's competition here
FWRD vs SINO Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check SINO's competition here
FWRD vs SFWL Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while SFWL trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check SFWL's competition here
FWRD vs FLX Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while FLX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check FLX's competition here
FWRD vs BTOC Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while BTOC trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check BTOC's competition here
FWRD vs AIRT Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while AIRT trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check AIRT's competition here
FWRD vs JYD Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while JYD trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check JYD's competition here
FWRD vs CJMB Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while CJMB trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CJMB's competition here
FWRD vs NCEW Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while NCEW trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 76.04. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check NCEW's competition here
FWRD vs CRGOW Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while CRGOW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CRGOW's competition here
FWRD vs HKPD Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while HKPD trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check HKPD's competition here
FWRD vs PSIG Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while PSIG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check PSIG's competition here
FWRD vs LSH Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while LSH trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check LSH's competition here
FWRD vs GVH Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while GVH trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check GVH's competition here
FWRD vs ATXG Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while ATXG trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ATXG's competition here
FWRD vs SGLY Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while SGLY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check SGLY's competition here
FWRD vs AIRTW Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check AIRTW's competition here
FWRD vs ECHO Comparison July 2025
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 936.7M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $30.79, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -1.05, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -3.72%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ECHO's competition here