Forward Air Corporation
Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FWRD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWRD | $16.05 | +1.58% | 501.5M | -4.57 | -$3.51 | N/A |
| FDX | $352.35 | +0.19% | 83.1B | 19.49 | $18.08 | +1.64% |
| UPS | $97.40 | +0.20% | 82.7B | 14.85 | $6.56 | +6.72% |
| XPO | $185.28 | +1.96% | 21.7B | 70.43 | $2.63 | N/A |
| CHRW | $170.48 | +0.64% | 20.2B | 35.37 | $4.82 | +1.46% |
| JBHT | $202.73 | +1.24% | 19.3B | 33.07 | $6.13 | +0.88% |
| EXPD | $142.79 | +0.17% | 19.1B | 24.05 | $5.94 | +1.07% |
| ZTO | $23.79 | -1.04% | 19B | 15.16 | $1.57 | +2.69% |
| GXO | $52.93 | +0.80% | 6.1B | 189.02 | $0.28 | N/A |
| LSTR | $148.69 | +0.51% | 5.1B | 44.92 | $3.31 | +2.42% |
Stock Comparison
FWRD vs FDX Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while FDX trades at $352.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check FDX's competition here
FWRD vs UPS Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while UPS trades at $97.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check UPS's competition here
FWRD vs XPO Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while XPO trades at $185.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 70.43. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check XPO's competition here
FWRD vs CHRW Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while CHRW trades at $170.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CHRW's competition here
FWRD vs JBHT Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while JBHT trades at $202.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check JBHT's competition here
FWRD vs EXPD Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while EXPD trades at $142.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check EXPD's competition here
FWRD vs ZTO Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while ZTO trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ZTO's competition here
FWRD vs GXO Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while GXO trades at $52.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 189.02. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check GXO's competition here
FWRD vs LSTR Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while LSTR trades at $148.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 44.92. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check LSTR's competition here
FWRD vs HUBG Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while HUBG trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check HUBG's competition here
FWRD vs PBI Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while PBI trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check PBI's competition here
FWRD vs CYRX Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 400.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while CYRX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CYRX's competition here
FWRD vs RLGT Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while RLGT trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check RLGT's competition here
FWRD vs PAL Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while PAL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check PAL's competition here
FWRD vs SINO Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check SINO's competition here
FWRD vs CRGO Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while CRGO trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CRGO's competition here
FWRD vs SFWL Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while SFWL trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check SFWL's competition here
FWRD vs AIRT Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while AIRT trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check AIRT's competition here
FWRD vs AIRTP Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while AIRTP trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 58.18. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check AIRTP's competition here
FWRD vs FLX Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while FLX trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FLX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check FLX's competition here
FWRD vs NCEW Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while NCEW trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check NCEW's competition here
FWRD vs PSIG Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while PSIG trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check PSIG's competition here
FWRD vs ELOG Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while ELOG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ELOG's competition here
FWRD vs BTOC Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while BTOC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check BTOC's competition here
FWRD vs CRGOW Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while CRGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CRGOW's competition here
FWRD vs LSH Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while LSH trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check LSH's competition here
FWRD vs CJMB Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while CJMB trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check CJMB's competition here
FWRD vs JYD Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while JYD trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check JYD's competition here
FWRD vs ATXG Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while ATXG trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ATXG's competition here
FWRD vs SGLY Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while SGLY trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check SGLY's competition here
FWRD vs GVH Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while GVH trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check GVH's competition here
FWRD vs AIRTW Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check AIRTW's competition here
FWRD vs ECHO Comparison March 2026
FWRD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWRD stands at 501.5M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FWRD is priced at $16.05, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWRD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.57, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWRD's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FWRD is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWRD.Check ECHO's competition here