Fortuna Mining Corp.
Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSM | $9.93 | +6.09% | 3.1B | 11.66 | $0.85 | N/A |
| BVN | $36.04 | +6.12% | 9.2B | 10.92 | $3.30 | +1.27% |
| TFPM | $34.71 | +5.60% | 7.2B | 29.42 | $1.18 | +0.70% |
| AUGO | $81.60 | +15.09% | 6.8B | -80.79 | -$1.01 | +2.67% |
| ELVR | $58.90 | +6.64% | 4.4B | -3.55 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ARIS | $18.57 | +7.84% | 3.8B | 45.27 | $0.41 | +1.64% |
| ALM | $14.48 | +5.16% | 3.8B | -25.40 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| PPTA | $28.12 | +11.10% | 3.4B | -53.06 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| GMTL | $17.65 | +7.59% | 3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EXK | $9.31 | +8.00% | 2.8B | -22.18 | -$0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSM vs BVN Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while BVN trades at $36.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check BVN's competition here
FSM vs TFPM Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while TFPM trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check TFPM's competition here
FSM vs AUGO Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while AUGO trades at $81.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is -80.79. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check AUGO's competition here
FSM vs ELVR Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ELVR trades at $58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ELVR's competition here
FSM vs ARIS Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ARIS trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ARIS's competition here
FSM vs ALM Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ALM trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -25.40. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ALM's competition here
FSM vs PPTA Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while PPTA trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -53.06. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check PPTA's competition here
FSM vs GMTL Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while GMTL trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GMTL's competition here
FSM vs EXK Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while EXK trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -22.18. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check EXK's competition here
FSM vs FRGOX Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while FRGOX trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check FRGOX's competition here
FSM vs SILV Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SILV's competition here
FSM vs CNL Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while CNL trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -34.45. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check CNL's competition here
FSM vs SLSR Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while SLSR trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -33.12. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SLSR's competition here
FSM vs MUX Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while MUX trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check MUX's competition here
FSM vs ELE Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ELE trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 314.00. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ELE's competition here
FSM vs ASM Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ASM trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ASM's competition here
FSM vs GATO Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GATO's competition here
FSM vs SCZM Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 782.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while SCZM trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SCZM's competition here
FSM vs NEWP Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 761.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while NEWP trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -207.00. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NEWP's competition here
FSM vs MMX Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check MMX's competition here
FSM vs GROY Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 627.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while GROY trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -179.00. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GROY's competition here
FSM vs MTA Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while MTA trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -221.67. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check MTA's competition here
FSM vs NSR Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NSR's competition here
FSM vs ITRG Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 463M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ITRG trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -273.50. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ITRG's competition here
FSM vs GROY-WT Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while GROY-WT trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GROY-WT's competition here
FSM vs VOXR Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while VOXR trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -174.67. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check VOXR's competition here
FSM vs PLG Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while PLG trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check PLG's competition here
FSM vs NVA Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while NVA trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NVA's competition here
FSM vs ATLX Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ATLX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ATLX's competition here
FSM vs NEXM Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while NEXM trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NEXM's competition here
FSM vs ALOY Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ALOY trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ALOY's competition here
FSM vs GRML Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while GRML trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GRML's competition here
FSM vs GRMLW Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while GRMLW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GRMLW's competition here
FSM vs AUMN Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while AUMN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check AUMN's competition here
FSM vs ERS Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ERS's competition here
FSM vs HDLS Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check HDLS's competition here
FSM vs SWC Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SWC's competition here
FSM vs ATL Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FSM has daily volatility of 3.58 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
FSM vs TRQ Comparison April 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $9.93, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check TRQ's competition here