Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.

FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PAAS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $7.13, while PAAS trades at $28.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas PAAS's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAAS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to PAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.

FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $7.13, while AG trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas AG's P/E ratio is -29.54. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to AG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.

FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $7.13, while MAG trades at $21.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MAG's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to MAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.

FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SVM has a market cap of 910M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $7.13, while SVM trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas SVM's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to SVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.

FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DVS has a market cap of 281.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $7.13, while DVS trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas DVS's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DVS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to DVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.

FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AXU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $7.13, while AXU trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas AXU's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to AXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.