Fortuna Mining Corp.
Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSM | $11.34 | -3.41% | 3.5B | 13.32 | $0.85 | N/A |
| BVN | $38.40 | -1.29% | 9.8B | 21.47 | $1.79 | +1.13% |
| TFPM | $38.24 | -2.27% | 7.9B | 32.41 | $1.18 | +0.60% |
| AUGO | $82.80 | -2.59% | 6.9B | -81.98 | -$1.01 | +2.27% |
| ALM | $22.28 | +4.65% | 5.7B | -92.83 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ELVR | $57.09 | +4.50% | 4.3B | -3.44 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ARIS | $19.71 | -1.20% | 4B | 72.93 | $0.27 | +2.14% |
| PPTA | $32.23 | -2.19% | 3.9B | -60.81 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $46.57 | -0.02% | 3.4B | 22.72 | $2.08 | N/A |
| EXK | $11.16 | -3.38% | 3.3B | -26.58 | -$0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSM vs BVN Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while BVN trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check BVN's competition here
FSM vs TFPM Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while TFPM trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check TFPM's competition here
FSM vs AUGO Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while AUGO trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is -81.98. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check AUGO's competition here
FSM vs ALM Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ALM trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -92.83. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ALM's competition here
FSM vs ELVR Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ELVR trades at $57.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ELVR's competition here
FSM vs ARIS Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ARIS trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 72.93. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ARIS's competition here
FSM vs PPTA Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while PPTA trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -60.81. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check PPTA's competition here
FSM vs FRGOX Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while FRGOX trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check FRGOX's competition here
FSM vs EXK Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while EXK trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -26.58. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check EXK's competition here
FSM vs SILV Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SILV's competition here
FSM vs CNL Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while CNL trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -34.18. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check CNL's competition here
FSM vs SLSR Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while SLSR trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -26.28. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SLSR's competition here
FSM vs MUX Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while MUX trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is -108.26. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MUX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check MUX's competition here
FSM vs ELE Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ELE trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 112.90. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ELE's competition here
FSM vs ASM Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ASM trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ASM's competition here
FSM vs GATO Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GATO's competition here
FSM vs SCZM Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 930.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while SCZM trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check SCZM's competition here
FSM vs NEWP Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 852.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while NEWP trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -231.75. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NEWP's competition here
FSM vs MTA Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 781.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while MTA trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -281.33. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check MTA's competition here
FSM vs MMX Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check MMX's competition here
FSM vs GROY Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 719.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while GROY trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -105.75. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GROY's competition here
FSM vs ITRG Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 612.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ITRG trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ITRG's competition here
FSM vs NSR Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NSR's competition here
FSM vs GROY-WT Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while GROY-WT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check GROY-WT's competition here
FSM vs VOXR Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 309.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while VOXR trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -202.67. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check VOXR's competition here
FSM vs PLG Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while PLG trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -58.37. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check PLG's competition here
FSM vs NVA Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while NVA trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -20.24. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NVA's competition here
FSM vs ATLX Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ATLX trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ATLX's competition here
FSM vs ALOY Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while ALOY trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check ALOY's competition here
FSM vs NEXM Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while NEXM trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check NEXM's competition here
FSM vs AUMN Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while AUMN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check AUMN's competition here
FSM vs TRQ Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check TRQ's competition here
FSM vs HDLS Comparison March 2026
FSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSM is priced at $11.34, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.32, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSM is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSM.Check HDLS's competition here