Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc.
Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. FRGI Peers
See (FRGI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRGI | $8.50 | +0.06% | 222.48M | -33.98 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| MCD | $314.61 | +0.10% | 224.96B | 27.77 | $11.33 | +2.18% |
| SBUX | $84.40 | +0.51% | 95.91B | 30.69 | $2.75 | +2.84% |
| CMG | $50.64 | -0.29% | 68.22B | 44.81 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $145.37 | -0.09% | 40.41B | 28.96 | $5.02 | +1.87% |
| DRI | $204.05 | +0.08% | 23.88B | 22.95 | $8.89 | +2.74% |
| QSR | $70.07 | +0.92% | 22.96B | 23.75 | $2.95 | +3.36% |
| DPZ | $480.43 | -0.38% | 16.45B | 27.53 | $17.45 | +1.30% |
| YUMC | $42.64 | +0.28% | 15.92B | 17.84 | $2.39 | +1.68% |
| TXRH | $189.99 | +0.67% | 12.60B | 29.36 | $6.47 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
FRGI vs MCD Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 224.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while MCD trades at $314.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs SBUX Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 95.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SBUX trades at $84.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CMG Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 68.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CMG trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs YUM Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while YUM trades at $145.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs DRI Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DRI trades at $204.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs QSR Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while QSR trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs DPZ Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DPZ trades at $480.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs YUMC Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while YUMC trades at $42.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs TXRH Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TXRH trades at $189.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BROS Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BROS trades at $67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 174.10. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CAVA Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CAVA trades at $83.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 69.51. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs WING Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 9.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while WING trades at $322.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 54.02. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs EAT Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while EAT trades at $154.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs SHAK Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SHAK trades at $117.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 405.41. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CAKE Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CAKE trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs WEN Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while WEN trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs ARCO Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ARCO trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs SG Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SG trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs PZZA Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PZZA trades at $42.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs HDL Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while HDL trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CBRL Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CBRL trades at $56.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CNNE Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CNNE trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FWRG Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 961.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FWRG trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 92.76. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BJRI Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 938.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BJRI trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 44.21. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs TWNPV Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BH Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 769.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BH trades at $248.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BH-A Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 764.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BH-A trades at $1,230.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs KRUS Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 761.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while KRUS trades at $62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -68.46. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs PTLO Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 732.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PTLO trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs RUTH Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CHUY Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BLMN Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 641.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BLMN trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs TAST Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs NATH Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 414.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while NATH trades at $101.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs JACK Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 383.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while JACK trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs DIN Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 360.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DIN trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs RICK Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 345.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RICK trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs VENU Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 331.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while VENU trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs PBPB Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 298.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PBPB trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs LOCO Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 274.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while LOCO trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs TWNP Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 236.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TWNP trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs DENN Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 195.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DENN trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BBQ Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs STKS Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 115.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while STKS trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs THCHW Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs THCH Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 93.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while THCH trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs MB Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 75.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while MB trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs RRGB Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 55.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RRGB trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs GRIL Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FATAV Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BDL Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 51.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BDL trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FATBW Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 46.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBW trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FATBB Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 42.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBB trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs ARKR Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 41.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ARKR trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FATBP Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 40.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FAT Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 39.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FAT trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs RAVE Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RAVE trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs NDLS Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 34.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while NDLS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs YOSH Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 25.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while YOSH trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs MYT Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs GENK Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 17.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while GENK trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs GTIM Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 16.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while GTIM trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs PC Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 15.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -18.98. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs CHSN Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 13.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CHSN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs REBN Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 12.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while REBN trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BTBDW Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 10.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BTBDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BTBD Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BTBD trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BTB Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs FATBV Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs PNST Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BFI Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs BFIIW Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242318.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs ONDR Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.
FRGI vs LUB Comparison
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.48M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.