Republic First Bancorp, Inc.
Republic First Bancorp, Inc. (FRBK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRBK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRBK | $0.01 | +150.00% | 704.1K | 0.05 | $0.22 | N/A |
| USB-PA | $779.64 | +0.21% | 1.3T | 221.86 | $3.51 | +3.74% |
| HDB | $30.38 | -1.52% | 157.9B | 20.94 | $1.47 | +3.58% |
| IBN | $28.81 | -2.69% | 105.7B | 18.36 | $1.61 | +0.87% |
| MFG | $8.07 | -1.89% | 101.4B | 15.20 | $0.54 | +2.10% |
| ITUB | $8.21 | -2.30% | 94.9B | 11.04 | $0.78 | +6.45% |
| PNC | $211.64 | -0.66% | 86.2B | 12.89 | $16.58 | +3.13% |
| USB | $53.72 | -0.50% | 84.5B | 11.76 | $4.62 | +3.74% |
| LYG | $5.21 | -2.16% | 79.4B | 14.57 | $0.37 | +3.09% |
| USB-PP | $23.34 | -0.38% | 74B | 5.08 | $4.64 | +3.74% |
Stock Comparison
FRBK vs USB-PA Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB-PA trades at $779.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 221.86. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB-PA's competition here
FRBK vs HDB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HDB trades at $30.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HDB's competition here
FRBK vs IBN Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while IBN trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check IBN's competition here
FRBK vs MFG Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while MFG trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check MFG's competition here
FRBK vs ITUB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while ITUB trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check ITUB's competition here
FRBK vs PNC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while PNC trades at $211.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check PNC's competition here
FRBK vs USB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB trades at $53.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB's competition here
FRBK vs LYG Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while LYG trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check LYG's competition here
FRBK vs USB-PP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB-PP trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB-PP's competition here
FRBK vs USB-PS Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB-PS trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB-PS's competition here
FRBK vs USB-PH Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB-PH trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB-PH's competition here
FRBK vs DB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while DB trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check DB's competition here
FRBK vs TFC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while TFC trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check TFC's competition here
FRBK vs BSBR Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BSBR trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BSBR's competition here
FRBK vs BBD Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BBD trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BBD's competition here
FRBK vs KB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while KB trades at $101.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check KB's competition here
FRBK vs HBANL Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HBANL trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HBANL's competition here
FRBK vs BBDO Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BBDO trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BBDO's competition here
FRBK vs HBANM Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HBANM trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HBANM's competition here
FRBK vs MTB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while MTB trades at $216.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check MTB's competition here
FRBK vs FITB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FITB trades at $48.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FITB's competition here
FRBK vs SHG Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while SHG trades at $59.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check SHG's competition here
FRBK vs TFC-PO Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while TFC-PO trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check TFC-PO's competition here
FRBK vs KEY-PL Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while KEY-PL trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check KEY-PL's competition here
FRBK vs BAP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BAP trades at $329.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BAP's competition here
FRBK vs HBANP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HBANP trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HBANP's competition here
FRBK vs USB-PR Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB-PR trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB-PR's competition here
FRBK vs CFG Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CFG trades at $59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CFG's competition here
FRBK vs TFC-PI Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while TFC-PI trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check TFC-PI's competition here
FRBK vs HBAN Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HBAN trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HBAN's competition here
FRBK vs TFC-PR Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while TFC-PR trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check TFC-PR's competition here
FRBK vs RF Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while RF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check RF's competition here
FRBK vs FCNCA Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FCNCA trades at $1,946.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FCNCA's competition here
FRBK vs USB-PQ Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while USB-PQ trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check USB-PQ's competition here
FRBK vs RF-PF Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while RF-PF trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check RF-PF's competition here
FRBK vs KEY-PJ Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
FRBK vs KEY Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while KEY trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check KEY's competition here
FRBK vs RF-PC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while RF-PC trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check RF-PC's competition here
FRBK vs KEY-PI Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while KEY-PI trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check KEY-PI's competition here
FRBK vs BCH Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BCH trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BCH's competition here
FRBK vs KEY-PK Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while KEY-PK trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check KEY-PK's competition here
FRBK vs CIB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CIB trades at $64.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CIB's competition here
FRBK vs WF Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while WF trades at $67.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check WF's competition here
FRBK vs FITBI Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FITBI trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FITBI's competition here
FRBK vs FITBP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FITBP trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FITBP's competition here
FRBK vs RF-PE Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while RF-PE trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check RF-PE's competition here
FRBK vs BSAC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BSAC trades at $31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BSAC's competition here
FRBK vs CFG-PD Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CFG-PD's competition here
FRBK vs VLYPN Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while VLYPN trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check VLYPN's competition here
FRBK vs FITBO Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FITBO trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FITBO's competition here
FRBK vs FHN-PC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FHN-PC trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FHN-PC's competition here
FRBK vs FHN-PB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FHN-PB's competition here
FRBK vs FHN-PE Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FHN-PE trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FHN-PE's competition here
FRBK vs CFG-PH Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CFG-PH trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CFG-PH's competition here
FRBK vs FHN Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FHN trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FHN's competition here
FRBK vs CMA Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CMA's competition here
FRBK vs WBS Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while WBS trades at $69.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check WBS's competition here
FRBK vs SSB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while SSB trades at $96.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check SSB's competition here
FRBK vs WTFC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while WTFC trades at $142.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check WTFC's competition here
FRBK vs FHN-PF Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FHN-PF trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FHN-PF's competition here
FRBK vs ONB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while ONB trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check ONB's competition here
FRBK vs ONBPO Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while ONBPO trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check ONBPO's competition here
FRBK vs ONBPP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while ONBPP trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check ONBPP's competition here
FRBK vs BPOP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BPOP trades at $133.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BPOP's competition here
FRBK vs UMBF Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while UMBF trades at $117.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check UMBF's competition here
FRBK vs WAL Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while WAL trades at $80.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check WAL's competition here
FRBK vs FHN-PD Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FHN-PD's competition here
FRBK vs CFR Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CFR trades at $137.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CFR's competition here
FRBK vs CFG-PE Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CFG-PE trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CFG-PE's competition here
FRBK vs ZION Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while ZION trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check ZION's competition here
FRBK vs CHYM Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CHYM trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CHYM's competition here
FRBK vs BOKF Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BOKF trades at $127.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BOKF's competition here
FRBK vs CADE Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CADE's competition here
FRBK vs CBSH Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CBSH trades at $51.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CBSH's competition here
FRBK vs BSMX Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BSMX's competition here
FRBK vs GGAL Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while GGAL trades at $41.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check GGAL's competition here
FRBK vs PNFP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while PNFP trades at $90.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check PNFP's competition here
FRBK vs VLY Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while VLY trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check VLY's competition here
FRBK vs SNV Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check SNV's competition here
FRBK vs PB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while PB trades at $69.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check PB's competition here
FRBK vs COLB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while COLB trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check COLB's competition here
FRBK vs SNV-PD Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check SNV-PD's competition here
FRBK vs CUBI-PE Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
FRBK vs FNB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FNB trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FNB's competition here
FRBK vs CBC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while CBC trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check CBC's competition here
FRBK vs GBCI Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while GBCI trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check GBCI's competition here
FRBK vs UBSI Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while UBSI trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check UBSI's competition here
FRBK vs HWC Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HWC trades at $64.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HWC's competition here
FRBK vs HOMB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while HOMB trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check HOMB's competition here
FRBK vs VLYPO Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while VLYPO trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check VLYPO's competition here
FRBK vs VLYPP Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while VLYPP trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check VLYPP's competition here
FRBK vs ABCB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while ABCB trades at $78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check ABCB's competition here
FRBK vs FLG Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while FLG trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -25.99. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check FLG's competition here
FRBK vs AUB Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while AUB trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check AUB's competition here
FRBK vs BXS Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check BXS's competition here
FRBK vs OZK Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while OZK trades at $46.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check OZK's competition here
FRBK vs IFS Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while IFS trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check IFS's competition here
FRBK vs AX Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while AX trades at $88.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check AX's competition here
FRBK vs AVAL Comparison March 2026
FRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRBK stands at 704.1K. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRBK is priced at $0.01, while AVAL trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, FRBK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRBK is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRBK.Check AVAL's competition here