flyExclusive, Inc. WT
flyExclusive, Inc. WT (FLYX-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLYX-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYX-WT | -$14.13 | -5146.43% | 7.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DAL | $66.61 | -1.23% | 45.4B | 9.07 | $7.66 | +0.97% |
| UAL | $107.34 | -2.46% | 36.6B | 11.08 | $10.20 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $64.51 | +0.55% | 33.8B | 12.77 | $5.05 | +1.32% |
| LUV | $50.38 | -3.25% | 26.9B | 65.94 | $0.79 | +1.38% |
| LTM | $57.72 | -0.72% | 16.6B | 11.62 | $4.96 | +3.29% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| PAC | $285.59 | -1.03% | 15.1B | 25.80 | $11.61 | +2.95% |
| ASR | $364.75 | -2.70% | 11.4B | 14.53 | $26.20 | +10.38% |
| JOBY | $9.48 | -7.51% | 9.5B | -7.27 | -$1.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLYX-WT vs DAL Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while DAL trades at $66.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check DAL's competition here
FLYX-WT vs UAL Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while UAL trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check UAL's competition here
FLYX-WT vs RYAAY Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while RYAAY trades at $64.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check RYAAY's competition here
FLYX-WT vs LUV Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while LUV trades at $50.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 65.94. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check LUV's competition here
FLYX-WT vs LTM Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while LTM trades at $57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check LTM's competition here
FLYX-WT vs CEA Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check CEA's competition here
FLYX-WT vs PAC Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while PAC trades at $285.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check PAC's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ASR Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ASR trades at $364.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ASR's competition here
FLYX-WT vs JOBY Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while JOBY trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check JOBY's competition here
FLYX-WT vs AAL Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while AAL trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 79.94. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check AAL's competition here
FLYX-WT vs OMAB Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while OMAB trades at $132.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check OMAB's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ALK Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ALK trades at $50.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 63.35. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ALK's competition here
FLYX-WT vs CPA Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while CPA trades at $142.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check CPA's competition here
FLYX-WT vs CAAP Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while CAAP trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check CAAP's competition here
FLYX-WT vs GOL Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check GOL's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SKYW Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SKYW trades at $100.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SKYW's competition here
FLYX-WT vs AERO Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while AERO trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check AERO's competition here
FLYX-WT vs AAWW Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check AAWW's competition here
FLYX-WT vs JBLU Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while JBLU trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check JBLU's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ALGT Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ALGT trades at $104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.41. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ALGT's competition here
FLYX-WT vs PBI-PB Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while PBI-PB trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check PBI-PB's competition here
FLYX-WT vs JOBY-WT Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ATSG Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ATSG's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ULCC Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ULCC trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ULCC's competition here
FLYX-WT vs VLRS Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while VLRS trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check VLRS's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SNCY Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SNCY trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SNCY's competition here
FLYX-WT vs HA Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check HA's competition here
FLYX-WT vs RJET Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 926.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while RJET trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RJET's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check RJET's competition here
FLYX-WT vs UP Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while UP trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check UP's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SRTA Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SRTA trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SRTA's competition here
FLYX-WT vs BLDE Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check BLDE's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ASLE Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ASLE trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 68.91. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ASLE's competition here
FLYX-WT vs FLYX Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while FLYX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check FLYX's competition here
FLYX-WT vs AZUL Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check AZUL's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SAVE Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SAVE's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SRFM Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SRFM trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SRFM's competition here
FLYX-WT vs MATH Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while MATH trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check MATH's competition here
FLYX-WT vs FLYY Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check FLYY's competition here
FLYX-WT vs BLDEW Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check BLDEW's competition here
FLYX-WT vs MESA Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MESA's ROE of +4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check MESA's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SRTAW Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SRTAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SRTAW's competition here
FLYX-WT vs SOAR Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while SOAR trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check SOAR's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ASLEW Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ASLEW's competition here
FLYX-WT vs ZNH Comparison February 2026
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at -$14.13, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.Check ZNH's competition here