flyExclusive, Inc. WT
flyExclusive, Inc. WT FLYX-WT Peers
See (FLYX-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYX-WT | $0.18 | +83.57% | 2.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DAL | $49.18 | -0.83% | 32.1B | 8.71 | $5.64 | +1.22% |
| UAL | $79.63 | +0.57% | 26B | 7.25 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $32.44 | +0.87% | 18.5B | 36.44 | $0.89 | +2.23% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $40.64 | +1.37% | 12.3B | 11.40 | $3.56 | +1.57% |
| PAC | $229.62 | +1.07% | 11.5B | 24.59 | $9.35 | +5.05% |
| ASR | $318.87 | +2.04% | 9.5B | 13.37 | $23.86 | +9.51% |
| JOBY-WT | $2.40 | +20.08% | 9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JOBY | $10.55 | +11.76% | 8.3B | -12.55 | -$0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLYX-WT vs DAL Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while DAL trades at $49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs UAL Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while UAL trades at $79.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs LUV Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while LUV trades at $32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs CEA Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs LTM Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while LTM trades at $40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs PAC Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while PAC trades at $229.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ASR Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ASR trades at $318.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs JOBY-WT Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while JOBY-WT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs JOBY Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while JOBY trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs AAL Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while AAL trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs RYAAY Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while RYAAY trades at $57.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ALK Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ALK trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs OMAB Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while OMAB trades at $105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs CPA Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while CPA trades at $109.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs GOL Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs SKYW Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while SKYW trades at $102.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs PBI-PB Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while PBI-PB trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs CAAP Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while CAAP trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs AAWW Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs JBLU Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while JBLU trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ATSG Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ALGT Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ALGT trades at $54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs HA Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ULCC Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 826.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ULCC trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs UP Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 747.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while UP trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs SNCY Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while SNCY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs VLRS Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 546.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while VLRS trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs BLDEW Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 372.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while BLDEW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs BLDE Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 326.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while BLDE trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ASLE Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 319.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ASLE trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -54.64. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs FLYX Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while FLYX trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs AZUL Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs MATH Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while MATH trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs FLYY Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while FLYY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs SAVE Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs SRFM Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while SRFM trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs MESA Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while MESA trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs SOAR Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while SOAR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ZNH Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.
FLYX-WT vs ASLEW Comparison
FLYX-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX-WT stands at 2.3M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX-WT is priced at $0.18, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, FLYX-WT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX-WT is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX-WT.