Fluor Corporation

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while PWR trades at $383.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 59.45. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PWR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while EME trades at $618.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check EME's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while FIX trades at $707.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FIX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while J trades at $148.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas J's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to J's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check J's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ACM trades at $125.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ACM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while APG trades at $36.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 100.69. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check APG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while MTZ trades at $182.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 54.36. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MTZ's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while STN trades at $108.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check STN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while BLD trades at $425.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BLD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while TTEK trades at $36.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 46.03. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check TTEK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while STRL trades at $292.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check STRL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while DY trades at $256.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check DY's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while IESC trades at $358.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IESC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ROAD trades at $122.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 88.61. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ROAD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while KBR trades at $51.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check KBR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while PRIM trades at $117.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PRIM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while GVA trades at $110.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check GVA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ECG trades at $78.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ECG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while AGX trades at $230.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AGX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while TPC trades at $58.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check TPC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while MYRG trades at $188.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MYRG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while WLDN trades at $116.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 48.59. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLDN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while NVEE trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check NVEE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while LMB trades at $123.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check LMB's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while AMRC trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AMRC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while JUNE trades at $62.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check JUNE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 813.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while GLDD trades at $11.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check GLDD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while BWMN trades at $41.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 64.12. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BWMN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 420.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while MTRX trades at $15.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MTRX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while BBCP trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BBCP's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 294.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while RITR trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check RITR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ORN trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ORN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while SLND trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SLND's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while MIMI trades at $8.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -120.71. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MIMI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AENZ's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ESOA trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 61.35. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ESOA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ONEG trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 141.50. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ONEG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check CSLRW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while SHIM trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SHIM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OEG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while BLNK trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BLNK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while VATE trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check VATE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while AGFY trades at $31.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AGFY's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check DRTT's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while MSW trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MSW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while FGL trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FGL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while PGHL trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PGHL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while WXM trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WXM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while SKBL trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SKBL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLMS's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while FBGL trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FBGL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while SKK trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SKK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ENG's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ENG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while SUNE trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SUNE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OIG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while WLGS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLGS's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IEA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while SCCI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FLR has daily volatility of 1.76 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check HIL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $41.41, while ATCX trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 1.71, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ATCX's competition here