Fluor Corporation

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while PWR trades at $412.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 68.16. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PWR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while EME trades at $634.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check EME's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while FIX trades at $686.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FIX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while J trades at $143.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas J's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check J's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ACM trades at $114.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ACM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while MTZ trades at $186.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 68.20. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MTZ's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while APG trades at $34.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 85.73. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check APG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while STN trades at $108.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check STN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while BLD trades at $383.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BLD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while TTEK trades at $37.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check TTEK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while STRL trades at $264.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check STRL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while DY trades at $264.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check DY's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while IESC trades at $353.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IESC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while KBR trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check KBR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ROAD trades at $102.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 90.90. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ROAD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while PRIM trades at $92.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PRIM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while GVA trades at $94.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check GVA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ECG trades at $74.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ECG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while AGX trades at $235.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AGX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while MYRG trades at $197.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 92.30. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MYRG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while TPC trades at $47.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check TPC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while LMB trades at $135.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check LMB's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while NVEE trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 51.27. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check NVEE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while WLDN trades at $83.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 48.54. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLDN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 953.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while AMRC trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AMRC's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while GLDD trades at $11.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check GLDD's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while BWMN trades at $35.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 212.53. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BWMN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while MTRX trades at $15.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MTRX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 367.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ORN trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 93.02. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ORN's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while BBCP trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BBCP's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 277.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while RITR trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 55.87. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check RITR's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while SLND trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SLND's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while JUNE trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check JUNE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while MIMI trades at $8.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 264.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MIMI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AENZ's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ESOA trades at $10.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ESOA's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check CSLRW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while BLNK trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check BLNK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OEG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while VATE trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check VATE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ONEG trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 53.55. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ONEG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while SHIM trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SHIM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while AGFY trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check AGFY's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while MSW trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check MSW's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check DRTT's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while SKBL trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SKBL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while PGHL trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check PGHL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while WXM trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WXM's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while FGL trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FGL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while SKK trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SKK's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLMS's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while FBGL trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check FBGL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while SUNE trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check SUNE's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ENG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while WLGS trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check WLGS's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check OIG's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while ATCX trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check ATCX's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while SCCI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FLR has daily volatility of 1.84 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check HIL's competition here

FLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLR is priced at $56.20, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.37, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FLR's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLR.Check IEA's competition here