Foot Locker, Inc.

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while TJX trades at $126.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check TJX's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while ROST trades at $138.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ROST's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while LULU trades at $219.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check LULU's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while BURL trades at $279.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BURL's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while ONON trades at $50.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 64.25. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ONON's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while GPS trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GPS's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while GAP trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GAP's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while URBN trades at $75.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check URBN's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while BOOT trades at $174.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BOOT's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while ANF trades at $92.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ANF's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while BKE trades at $49.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BKE's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while AEO trades at $11.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check AEO's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while VSCO trades at $21.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check VSCO's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while HIBB trades at $87.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check HIBB's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 958.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while CRI trades at $26.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CRI's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while CHS trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CHS's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 709.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while GES trades at $13.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -124.00. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GES's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 659M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while SFIX trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check SFIX's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while SCVL trades at $22.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check SCVL's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while CURV trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CURV's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 267.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while GCO trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GCO's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while ZUMZ trades at $14.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -741.50. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ZUMZ's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while CTRN trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CTRN's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while JILL trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check JILL's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while DBI trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DBI's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while PLCE trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check PLCE's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while BIRD trades at $11.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BIRD's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while DLTH trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DLTH's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while DXLG trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DXLG's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while CATO trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CATO's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while TLYS trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check TLYS's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while DBGI trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DBGI's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DBGIW's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while RENT trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check RENT's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while LVLU trades at $4.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check LVLU's competition here

FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $25.49, while EXPR trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.87, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check EXPR's competition here