Foot Locker, Inc.
Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $24.01 | -0.37% | 2.3B | -6.05 | -$3.97 | N/A |
| TJX | $155.88 | +0.06% | 173B | 31.98 | $4.86 | +1.09% |
| ROST | $208.50 | -0.64% | 67.1B | 31.16 | $6.62 | +0.80% |
| BURL | $304.65 | +3.97% | 18.7B | 31.22 | $9.50 | N/A |
| LULU | $160.89 | +1.71% | 17.7B | 10.98 | $14.37 | N/A |
| ONON | $38.81 | +2.24% | 12.6B | 50.65 | $0.75 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $23.60 | +2.03% | 8.6B | 10.28 | $2.26 | +2.86% |
| URBN | $65.51 | +2.76% | 5.7B | 12.53 | $5.06 | N/A |
| BOOT | $161.72 | -3.37% | 5B | 22.98 | $7.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FL vs TJX Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 173B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while TJX trades at $155.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check TJX's competition here
FL vs ROST Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while ROST trades at $208.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ROST's competition here
FL vs BURL Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while BURL trades at $304.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BURL's competition here
FL vs LULU Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while LULU trades at $160.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check LULU's competition here
FL vs ONON Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while ONON trades at $38.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ONON's competition here
FL vs GPS Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GPS's competition here
FL vs GAP Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while GAP trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GAP's competition here
FL vs URBN Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while URBN trades at $65.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check URBN's competition here
FL vs BOOT Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while BOOT trades at $161.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BOOT's competition here
FL vs ANF Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while ANF trades at $84.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ANF's competition here
FL vs VSCO Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while VSCO trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check VSCO's competition here
FL vs AEO Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while AEO trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check AEO's competition here
FL vs BKE Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while BKE trades at $49.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BKE's competition here
FL vs CRI Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while CRI trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CRI's competition here
FL vs HIBB Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check HIBB's competition here
FL vs CHS Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CHS's competition here
FL vs GES Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GES's competition here
FL vs SCVL Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while SCVL trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check SCVL's competition here
FL vs SFIX Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 440.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while SFIX trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check SFIX's competition here
FL vs ZUMZ Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while ZUMZ trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check ZUMZ's competition here
FL vs CTRN Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while CTRN trades at $45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -21.95. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CTRN's competition here
FL vs DBI Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while DBI trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DBI's competition here
FL vs GCO Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while GCO trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -113.80. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check GCO's competition here
FL vs JILL Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while JILL trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check JILL's competition here
FL vs CURV Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while CURV trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -62.53. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CURV's competition here
FL vs TLYS Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while TLYS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check TLYS's competition here
FL vs PLCE Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while PLCE trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check PLCE's competition here
FL vs DLTH Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while DLTH trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DLTH's competition here
FL vs CATO Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while CATO trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CATO's competition here
FL vs LVLU Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while LVLU trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -6.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check LVLU's competition here
FL vs DBGIW Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DBGIW's competition here
FL vs DXLG Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while DXLG trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DXLG's competition here
FL vs BIRD Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while BIRD trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check BIRD's competition here
FL vs RENT Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while RENT trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check RENT's competition here
FL vs DBGI Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while DBGI trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check DBGI's competition here
FL vs EXPR Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check EXPR's competition here
FL vs JEM Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while JEM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check JEM's competition here
FL vs CLE Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FL is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check CLE's competition here
FL vs COX Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check COX's competition here
FL vs LDG Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check LDG's competition here
FL vs TSA Comparison March 2026
FL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FL stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FL is priced at $24.01, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FL's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FL is less volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FL.Check TSA's competition here