F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | $27.68 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 7.41 | $3.44 | +3.49% |
| MFC | $36.17 | +0.00% | 61.5B | 16.23 | $2.26 | +3.42% |
| AFL | $112.76 | +0.00% | 59.8B | 16.72 | $6.82 | +2.06% |
| MET | $78.10 | +0.00% | 52.1B | 16.35 | $4.84 | +2.88% |
| MET-PE | $24.35 | +0.00% | 51.3B | 3.12 | $7.81 | +2.88% |
| MET-PA | $21.80 | +0.00% | 42.2B | 2.78 | $7.81 | +2.88% |
| PUK | $30.37 | +0.00% | 40.5B | 12.06 | $2.57 | +1.52% |
| PRU | $102.71 | +0.00% | 36B | 10.36 | $9.99 | +5.27% |
| MET-PF | $20.14 | +0.00% | 13.2B | 2.57 | $7.81 | +2.88% |
| UNM | $73.47 | +0.00% | 12.3B | 17.25 | $4.27 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
FG vs MFC Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MFC trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MFC's competition here
FG vs AFL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while AFL trades at $112.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AFL's competition here
FG vs MET Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MET trades at $78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET's competition here
FG vs MET-PE Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MET-PE trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PE's competition here
FG vs MET-PA Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MET-PA trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PA's competition here
FG vs PUK Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while PUK trades at $30.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PUK's competition here
FG vs PRU Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while PRU trades at $102.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRU's competition here
FG vs MET-PF Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MET-PF trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PF's competition here
FG vs UNM Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while UNM trades at $73.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check UNM's competition here
FG vs GL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while GL trades at $144.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GL's competition here
FG vs PRH Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while PRH trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRH's competition here
FG vs PRS Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while PRS trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRS's competition here
FG vs PRI Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while PRI trades at $257.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRI's competition here
FG vs JXN Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while JXN trades at $113.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check JXN's competition here
FG vs LNC Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while LNC trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LNC's competition here
FG vs LNC-PD Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while LNC-PD trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LNC-PD's competition here
FG vs FGN Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while FGN trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check FGN's competition here
FG vs AEL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL's competition here
FG vs CNO Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while CNO trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check CNO's competition here
FG vs BHF Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while BHF trades at $63.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHF's competition here
FG vs GNW Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while GNW trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GNW's competition here
FG vs BHFAP Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while BHFAP trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAP's competition here
FG vs ABLLL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while ABLLL trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABLLL's competition here
FG vs BHFAL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while BHFAL trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAL's competition here
FG vs MLCIL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MLCIL trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MLCIL's competition here
FG vs AEL-PB Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL-PB's competition here
FG vs NWLI Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check NWLI's competition here
FG vs AEL-PA Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL-PA's competition here
FG vs JXN-PA Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while JXN-PA trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check JXN-PA's competition here
FG vs MHNC Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MHNC trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MHNC's competition here
FG vs GL-PD Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while GL-PD trades at $137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GL-PD's competition here
FG vs BHFAO Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while BHFAO trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAO's competition here
FG vs ABX Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while ABX trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 174.40. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABX's competition here
FG vs ABL Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while ABL trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 174.40. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABL's competition here
FG vs BHFAN Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 791.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while BHFAN trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAN's competition here
FG vs BHFAM Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 719.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while BHFAM trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAM's competition here
FG vs LIFE Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 678.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while LIFE trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LIFE's competition here
FG vs ABLLW Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABLLW's competition here
FG vs CIA Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while CIA trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check CIA's competition here
FG vs VERY Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check VERY's competition here
FG vs MDWT Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MDWT's competition here
FG vs AAME Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while AAME trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AAME's competition here
FG vs IHC Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check IHC's competition here
FG vs LFC Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LFC's competition here
FG vs GWGH Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GWGH's competition here
FG vs MLG Comparison February 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.68, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MLG's competition here