F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | $22.19 | +7.25% | 2.8B | 11.14 | $1.88 | +4.34% |
| AFL | $109.37 | -0.24% | 56.1B | 15.94 | $6.82 | +2.15% |
| MFC | $34.17 | +1.99% | 56B | 14.79 | $2.26 | +3.89% |
| MET-PE | $23.14 | -0.98% | 48.9B | 2.97 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| MET | $69.22 | +0.63% | 44.8B | 14.43 | $4.71 | +3.32% |
| MET-PA | $21.58 | +0.34% | 41.8B | 2.76 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| PUK | $29.48 | +1.36% | 37.4B | 11.14 | $2.57 | +1.64% |
| PRU | $93.51 | +1.27% | 32B | 9.21 | $9.99 | +5.90% |
| MET-PF | $18.95 | -0.58% | 12.3B | 2.42 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| UNM | $72.80 | +0.15% | 12.1B | 16.90 | $4.27 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
FG vs AFL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while AFL trades at $109.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AFL's competition here
FG vs MFC Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MFC trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MFC's competition here
FG vs MET-PE Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MET-PE trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PE's competition here
FG vs MET Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MET trades at $69.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET's competition here
FG vs MET-PA Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MET-PA trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PA's competition here
FG vs PUK Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while PUK trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PUK's competition here
FG vs PRU Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while PRU trades at $93.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRU's competition here
FG vs MET-PF Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MET-PF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PF's competition here
FG vs UNM Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while UNM trades at $72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check UNM's competition here
FG vs GL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while GL trades at $140.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GL's competition here
FG vs PRH Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while PRH trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRH's competition here
FG vs PRS Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while PRS trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRS's competition here
FG vs PRI Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while PRI trades at $250.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRI's competition here
FG vs JXN Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while JXN trades at $104.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -436.21. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check JXN's competition here
FG vs LNC Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while LNC trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LNC's competition here
FG vs LNC-PD Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while LNC-PD trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LNC-PD's competition here
FG vs AEL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL's competition here
FG vs FGN Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while FGN trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check FGN's competition here
FG vs CNO Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while CNO trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check CNO's competition here
FG vs BHF Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while BHF trades at $60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHF's competition here
FG vs GNW Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while GNW trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GNW's competition here
FG vs BHFAP Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while BHFAP trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAP's competition here
FG vs ABLLL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while ABLLL trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABLLL's competition here
FG vs BHFAL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while BHFAL trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAL's competition here
FG vs MLCIL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MLCIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FG has daily volatility of 3.56 and MLCIL has daily volatility of N/A.Check MLCIL's competition here
FG vs JXN-PA Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while JXN-PA trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check JXN-PA's competition here
FG vs AEL-PB Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL-PB's competition here
FG vs NWLI Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check NWLI's competition here
FG vs AEL-PA Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL-PA's competition here
FG vs MHNC Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MHNC trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MHNC's competition here
FG vs GL-PD Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while GL-PD trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GL-PD's competition here
FG vs ABL Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 987.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while ABL trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABL's competition here
FG vs ABX Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 959M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while ABX trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 196.20. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABX's competition here
FG vs BHFAO Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 928.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while BHFAO trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAO's competition here
FG vs LIFE Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 762.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while LIFE trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LIFE's competition here
FG vs BHFAN Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 732M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while BHFAN trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAN's competition here
FG vs BHFAM Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 647.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while BHFAM trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAM's competition here
FG vs ABLLW Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABLLW's competition here
FG vs CIA Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 231.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while CIA trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check CIA's competition here
FG vs VERY Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check VERY's competition here
FG vs MDWT Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MDWT's competition here
FG vs AAME Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while AAME trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AAME's competition here
FG vs LFC Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LFC's competition here
FG vs MLG Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MLG's competition here
FG vs IHC Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check IHC's competition here
FG vs GWGH Comparison March 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $22.19, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.14, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GWGH's competition here