FAT Brands Inc. Class B Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 222.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while MCD trades at $311.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 97.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while SBUX trades at $85.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 68.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CMG trades at $50.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.92. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while YUM trades at $146.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while DRI trades at $203.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while QSR trades at $68.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while YUMC trades at $46.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while DPZ trades at $482.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while TXRH trades at $189.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BROS trades at $69.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 205.56. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CAVA trades at $98.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 89.79. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 7.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while WING trades at $285.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 47.90. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while EAT trades at $145.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while SHAK trades at $99.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CAKE trades at $52.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while WEN trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while SG trades at $15.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -19.82. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while ARCO trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while HDL trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 53.20. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while PZZA trades at $41.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CNNE trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CBRL trades at $51.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FWRG trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 98.53. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 918.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BJRI trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 43.28. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 807.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while KRUS trades at $66.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -72.63. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 779.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while PTLO trades at $12.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 749.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BLMN trades at $8.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 726.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BH-A trades at $1,160.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -86.05. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 723.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BH trades at $234.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -87.40. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while RUTH trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CHUY trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 543.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while JACK trades at $28.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while TAST trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 421.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while NATH trades at $103.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 384.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while RICK trades at $43.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 76.12. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 378.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while DIN trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 345.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while TWNP trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 305.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while PBPB trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 296.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while VENU trades at $7.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 283.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while LOCO trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 237.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while DENN trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FRGI trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BBQ trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 170.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while GENK trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to GENK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 135.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while STKS trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while THCHW trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 90.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while THCH trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 63.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while MB trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while GRIL trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FATAV trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 54.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while RRGB trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 52.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FATBP trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 52.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FAT trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 50.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FATBW trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 46.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while FATBB trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 43.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BDL trades at $23.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 39.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while ARKR trades at $11.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 39.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while NDLS trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to NDLS's ROE of -4.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while RAVE trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 23.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while YOSH trades at $13.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to YOSH's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while MYT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 19.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while GTIM trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 14.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while PC trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -17.90. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 11.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while REBN trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 11.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while CHSN trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BTBDW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BTBD trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BTB trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BFI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while PNST trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242318.00. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.

FATBV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FATBV stands at 6.07M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81.00. Regarding current trading prices, FATBV is priced at $4.78, while ONDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FATBV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATBV's ROE is N/A, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATBV is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATBV.