FAT Brands Inc.

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while MCD trades at $308.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to MCD's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check MCD's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while SBUX trades at $93.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SBUX's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CMG trades at $43.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CMG's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while YUM trades at $146.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check YUM's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while DRI trades at $206.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DRI's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while QSR trades at $65.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check QSR's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while YUMC trades at $44.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check YUMC's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while DPZ trades at $450.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DPZ's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while TXRH trades at $172.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TXRH's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BROS trades at $63.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 136.94. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BROS's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while WING trades at $325.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 56.14. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check WING's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CAVA trades at $68.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 59.24. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CAVA's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while EAT trades at $158.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check EAT's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while SHAK trades at $105.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 232.50. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SHAK's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CAKE trades at $63.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CAKE's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while WEN trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check WEN's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while PZZA trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PZZA's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while ARCO trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ARCO's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CBRL trades at $62.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CBRL's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while HDL trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check HDL's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FWRG trades at $17.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 99.11. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FWRG's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while SG trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SG's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CNNE trades at $17.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CNNE's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BH-A trades at $1,432.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BH-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BH-A's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 961.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BH trades at $288.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BH's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while KRUS trades at $78.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -94.18. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check KRUS's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TWNPV's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 776.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BJRI trades at $35.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BJRI's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while RUTH trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RUTH's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CHUY trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CHUY's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 595.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BLMN trades at $7.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BLMN's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 587.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while VENU trades at $15.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check VENU's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 548.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while PTLO trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PTLO's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while TAST trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TAST's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 430.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while NATH trades at $103.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check NATH's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 386.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while JACK trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check JACK's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while PBPB trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PBPB's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while DIN trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DIN's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while RICK trades at $37.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RICK's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while LOCO trades at $10.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check LOCO's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FRGI trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FRGI's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while DENN trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DENN's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while TWNP trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TWNP's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BBQ trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BBQ's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while RRGB trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RRGB's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 111.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while GENK trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check GENK's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while THCHW trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check THCHW's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while THCH trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check THCH's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while STKS trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check STKS's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while MB trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check MB's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BDL trades at $30.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BDL's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while GRIL trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check GRIL's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FATAV trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATAV's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FATBW trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +110.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBW's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while RAVE trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RAVE's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FATBB trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +110.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBB's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while NDLS trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check NDLS's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FATBP trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +110.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBP's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while ARKR trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ARKR's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while MYT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check MYT's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while GTIM trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check GTIM's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while REBN trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to REBN's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check REBN's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BTBDW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BTBDW's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while YOSH trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check YOSH's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while PC trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PC's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BTBD trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BTBD's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BTB trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BTB's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while FATBV trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBV's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BFI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BFI's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while PNST trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PNST's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while CHSN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CHSN's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BFIIW's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while ONDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ONDR's competition here

FAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 35.8M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $2.01, while LUB trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +110.21%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check LUB's competition here