FACT II Acquisition Corp. Unit
FACT II Acquisition Corp. Unit FACTU Peers
See (FACTU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACTU | $10.30 | +0.00% | 277.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPGXL | $25.75 | -0.16% | 19.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.22% |
| VOYA-PB | $24.44 | +0.66% | 7B | 2.90 | $8.44 | +2.47% |
| VOYA | $72.90 | +0.29% | 7B | 13.63 | $5.35 | +2.47% |
| BIPH | $16.24 | +0.00% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.70% |
| PACS | $13.14 | +0.77% | 2B | 21.54 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MSDL | $19.17 | +0.10% | 1.7B | 8.79 | $2.18 | +11.48% |
| RILYM | $25.11 | +0.00% | 753M | N/A | N/A | +6.35% |
| BEAGU | $10.69 | +0.38% | 614.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RILYO | $25.13 | -0.02% | 573.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FACTU vs TPGXL Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while TPGXL trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs VOYA-PB Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs VOYA Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while VOYA trades at $72.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BIPH Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BIPH trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs PACS Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while PACS trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs MSDL Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while MSDL trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYM Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BEAGU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 614.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BEAGU trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYO Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs TREE Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while TREE trades at $38.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs ANSCU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 461.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BACQU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BACQU trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs DRDBU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 322.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while DRDBU trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and DRDBU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs POLEU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 309.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while POLEU trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs HVIIU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 273.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while HVIIU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and HVIIU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs HVII Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while HVII trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and HVII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs PLMKU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while PLMKU trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and PLMKU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs NTWOU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while NTWOU trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and NTWOU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs PLMK Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while PLMK trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs DMAAU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while DMAAU trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and DMAAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs DRDB Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while DRDB trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and DRDB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs BSIIU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs TAVIU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RANG Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RANG trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and RANG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs ACOG Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while ACOG trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs SVCCU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while SVCCU trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYT Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYT trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs SPHA Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYG Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYG trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYN Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYN trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYK Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYK trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILY Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILY trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILY's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs NOEM Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while NOEM trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 202.20. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs DTSQ Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while DTSQ trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RMI Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RMI trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs FLDD Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs CAPNU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while CAPNU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and CAPNU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs YHNA Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while YHNA trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYP Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYP trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYL Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYL trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BAYAU Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BAYAU trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and BAYAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs COOTW Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COOTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and COOTW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs DRDBW Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while DRDBW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs APLMW Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while APLMW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs HVIIR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while HVIIR trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BSLKW Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs MLACR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while MLACR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and MLACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs PLMKW Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while PLMKW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RANGR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RANGR trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs TENKR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs NOEMR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while NOEMR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and NOEMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs YHNAR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while YHNAR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs EURKR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while EURKR trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs CAPNR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while CAPNR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs DTSQR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while DTSQR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and DTSQR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs FSHPR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while FSHPR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs ATMCR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 922.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while ATMCR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BRACR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs EMCGR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 516.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while EMCGR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU and EMCGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FACTU vs RILYH Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs BIPJ Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while BIPJ trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs LCAAW Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs SPHAR Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.
FACTU vs RILYI Comparison
FACTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACTU stands at 277.4M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FACTU is priced at $10.30, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACTU's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FACTU is less volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACTU.