Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. EOSEW Peers
See (EOSEW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOSEW | $0.50 | +6.36% | 113.77M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | N/A | 69.02B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $104.16 | +0.53% | 39.69B | 60.56 | $1.72 | +0.12% |
| HUBB | $389.30 | +1.94% | 20.78B | 26.34 | $14.78 | +1.30% |
| NVT | $64.88 | +1.34% | 10.68B | 45.06 | $1.44 | +1.20% |
| AYI | $262.38 | +0.37% | 8.11B | 19.89 | $13.19 | +0.24% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.58B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| AEIS | $115.94 | -0.05% | 4.37B | 58.56 | $1.98 | +0.34% |
| BE | $18.36 | +0.82% | 4.26B | 918.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| ENS | $81.29 | -14.88% | 3.21B | 10.09 | $8.06 | +1.13% |
Stock Comparison
EOSEW vs ABB Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69.02B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs VRT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 39.69B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while VRT trades at $104.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 60.56. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs HUBB Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 20.78B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while HUBB trades at $389.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs NVT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while NVT trades at $64.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs AYI Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while AYI trades at $262.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs WIRE Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs AEIS Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while AEIS trades at $115.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 58.56. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs BE Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while BE trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 918.00. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ENS Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ENS trades at $81.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs HAYW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while HAYW trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ATKR Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ATKR trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs POWL Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while POWL trades at $173.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ENR Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ENR trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs HOLI Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ENVX Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ENVX trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs EOSE Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while EOSE trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs MVST Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while MVST trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs PLUG Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 862.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while PLUG trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs PLPC Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 670.05M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while PLPC trades at $135.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ADSE Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 656.44M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ADSE trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ADSE's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs KE Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 430.07M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while KE trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs AMPX-WT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 385.59M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SES-WT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 329.34M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SES-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs AMPX Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 304.98M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while AMPX trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs AIRJ Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 251.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while AIRJ trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 46.33. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs EAF Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 247.79M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while EAF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs FREY Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.82M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SLDP Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 240.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SLDP trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs LTBR Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 240.26M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while LTBR trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ELPW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 230.24M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ELPW trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs NVX Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 203.53M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while NVX trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs TE Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 151.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while TE trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SKYX Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 139.67M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SKYX trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ELVA Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 124.28M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ELVA trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -77.50. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ADSEW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 107.20M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ADSEW trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs FCEL Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while FCEL trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ESP Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 99.93M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ESP trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs MVSTW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 98.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while MVSTW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs NEOV Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 97.94M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while NEOV trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SVT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 96.87M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SVT trades at $37.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -97.15. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs OPTT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 95.15M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while OPTT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs ULBI Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 91.98M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while ULBI trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs CBAT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 76.45M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while CBAT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs RAYA Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 64.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while RAYA trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -36.40. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs RFIL Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 46.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while RFIL trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs IPWR Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 42.24M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while IPWR trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs NEOVW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 37.04M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while NEOVW trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SDST Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 36.55M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SDST trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs CHEV Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 34.41M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while CHEV trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs APWC Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 32.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while APWC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs PPSI Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 28.58M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while PPSI trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SLDPW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 28.52M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SLDPW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs FLUX Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 28.42M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while FLUX trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs OESX Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 22.87M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while OESX trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs GWH-WT Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 22.84M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs GWH Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 22.03M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while GWH trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs CCTG Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 14.24M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while CCTG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs PITA Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs STI Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 8.94M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while STI trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to STI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs NXU Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.39M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs POLA Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while POLA trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs DFLI Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 3.79M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while DFLI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to DFLI's ROE of -20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs DFLIW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 3.62M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while DFLIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of -20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs SDSTW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 3.61M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while SDSTW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs XPON Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while XPON trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs DCFC Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 29240.00. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.
EOSEW vs DCFCW Comparison
EOSEW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EOSEW stands at 113.77M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14027.00. Regarding current trading prices, EOSEW is priced at $0.50, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EOSEW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EOSEW's ROE is +1.07%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EOSEW is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EOSEW.