EnerSys
EnerSys ENS Peers
See (ENS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENS | $100.44 | +1.74% | 3.96B | 12.46 | $8.06 | +0.94% |
| ABB | $37.13 | N/A | 69.02B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $105.53 | +4.43% | 40.22B | 61.35 | $1.72 | +0.12% |
| HUBB | $386.75 | +2.20% | 20.64B | 26.13 | $14.80 | +1.31% |
| NVT | $68.11 | +2.36% | 11.21B | 47.30 | $1.44 | +1.13% |
| AYI | $273.92 | +0.93% | 8.47B | 20.78 | $13.18 | +0.23% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.58B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| AEIS | $120.14 | +2.35% | 4.52B | 60.68 | $1.98 | +0.33% |
| BE | $19.15 | +1.27% | 4.45B | 957.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| HAYW | $14.75 | +0.07% | 3.19B | 26.34 | $0.56 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ENS vs ABB Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs VRT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 40.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while VRT trades at $105.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 61.35. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs HUBB Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 20.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while HUBB trades at $386.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NVT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 11.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while NVT trades at $68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AYI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while AYI trades at $273.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs WIRE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AEIS Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while AEIS trades at $120.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs BE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while BE trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 957.50. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs HAYW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while HAYW trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ATKR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ATKR trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs POWL Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while POWL trades at $194.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ENR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ENR trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs HOLI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs EOSE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while EOSE trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ENVX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ENVX trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs MVST Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while MVST trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PLUG Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 830.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while PLUG trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ADSE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 721.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ADSE trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADSE's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PLPC Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 700.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while PLPC trades at $141.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ADSEW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 679.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ADSEW trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs STI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 571.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while STI trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs KE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 451.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while KE trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SES-WT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 395.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SES-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AMPX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 345.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while AMPX trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AMPX-WT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 326.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ELPW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 275.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ELPW trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -30.61. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs AIRJ Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 274.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while AIRJ trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs FREY Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs TE Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 236.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while TE trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs LTBR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 236.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while LTBR trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NVX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 221.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while NVX trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs EAF Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 218.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while EAF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SLDP Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 192.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SLDP trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs EOSEW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 147.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while EOSEW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NEOV Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 112.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while NEOV trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -33.10. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ELVA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 110.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ELVA trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SKYX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SKYX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs FCEL Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 97.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while FCEL trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs MVSTW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 96.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while MVSTW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ESP Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 96.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ESP trades at $34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs OPTT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 95.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while OPTT trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs ULBI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 91.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while ULBI trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs CBAT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 84.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while CBAT trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs RAYA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 67.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while RAYA trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SDST Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 44.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SDST trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NEOVW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 42.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while NEOVW trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs RFIL Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 42.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while RFIL trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs IPWR Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while IPWR trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs GWH Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 34.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while GWH trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs CHEV Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 33.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while CHEV trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs FLUX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 33.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while FLUX trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs APWC Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 32.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while APWC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs GWH-WT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 30.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while GWH-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PPSI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 30.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while PPSI trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SLDPW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 26.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SLDPW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SVT Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 26.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SVT trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs OESX Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 23.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while OESX trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs CCTG Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 14.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while CCTG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs PITA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs NXU Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs POLA Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while POLA trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DFLIW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 3.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of -12.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs XPON Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while XPON trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DFLI Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 3.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while DFLI trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFLI's ROE of -12.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs SDSTW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 3.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while SDSTW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DCFC Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 30248.00. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.
ENS vs DCFCW Comparison
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 3.96B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14027.00. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $100.44, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.