EnerSys

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while VRT trades at $243.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 71.52. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check VRT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ABB trades at $37.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ABB's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while BE trades at $159.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -409.89. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check BE's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while HUBB trades at $526.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check HUBB's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while NVT trades at $116.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NVT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while AEIS trades at $320.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 85.81. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AEIS's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while AYI trades at $312.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AYI's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while POWL trades at $536.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check POWL's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while WIRE trades at $289.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check WIRE's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while HAYW trades at $16.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check HAYW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while EOSE trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check EOSE's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ATKR trades at $66.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ATKR's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while PLUG trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PLUG's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while HOLI trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check HOLI's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ENR trades at $22.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENR's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while PLPC trades at $260.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PLPC's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ENVX trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENVX's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while AMPX trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -35.28. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AMPX's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while TE trades at $6.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TE's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check TE's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while MVST trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check MVST's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 662.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SLDP trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SLDP's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 649.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ADSE trades at $10.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ADSE's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 609.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while KE trades at $24.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check KE's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 450.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while AMPX-WT trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AMPX-WT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check EOSEW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while FCEL trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FCEL's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while LTBR trades at $13.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check LTBR's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 299.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ELVA trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 69.73. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ELVA's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while FREY trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FREY's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FREY's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SKYX trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SKYX's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while AIRJ trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AIRJ's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ESP trades at $58.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ESP's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while EAF trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EAF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check EAF's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENVXW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while NVX trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NVX's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while NEOV trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NEOV's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SVT trades at $46.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SVT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while TGEN trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check TGEN's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while RFIL trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 929.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check RFIL's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ULBI trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 58.70. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ULBI's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while CBAT trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check CBAT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while OPTT trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check OPTT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SES-WT trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SES-WT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SLDPW trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SLDPW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while CHEV trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -507.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check CHEV's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while NEOVW trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NEOVW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ADSEW trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ADSEW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while OESX trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check OESX's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while PPSI trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PPSI's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while GCDT trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -58.17. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check GCDT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while APWC trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check APWC's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while IPWR trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check IPWR's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SDST trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDST's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SDST's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while FLUX trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FLUX's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while GWH trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWH's ROE of -5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check GWH's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while GWH-WT trades at -$14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check GWH-WT's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while MVSTW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check MVSTW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while PITA trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PITA's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while STI trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STI's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check STI's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while NXU trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NXU's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ZOOZ trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ZOOZ's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while POLA trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POLA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check POLA's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while XPON trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XPON's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check XPON's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while SDSTW trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SDSTW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while DFLI trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DFLI's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ELPW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ELPW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while RAYA trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check RAYA's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 704.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while CCTG trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check CCTG's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 452.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DFLIW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ZOOZW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ZOOZW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DCFCW's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while DCFC trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DCFC's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENR-PA's competition here

ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $176.85, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.50, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check BLNKW's competition here