Elong Power Holding Limited
Elong Power Holding Limited ELPW Peers
See (ELPW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELPW | $2.09 | -3.24% | 111.6M | -12.39 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $123.19 | -4.04% | 46B | 70.16 | $1.72 | +0.13% |
| HUBB | $419.01 | +0.31% | 22.5B | 28.52 | $14.81 | +1.51% |
| NVT | $74.35 | -1.14% | 12.3B | 51.86 | $1.44 | +1.30% |
| AYI | $296.19 | -2.23% | 9.3B | 23.84 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
| BE | $25.52 | -11.13% | 6B | 1294.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $141.91 | +0.55% | 5.4B | 72.55 | $1.98 | +0.35% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | N/A |
| ENS | $87.79 | -0.75% | 3.4B | 9.88 | $8.99 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
ELPW vs ABB Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs VRT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while VRT trades at $123.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 70.16. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs HUBB Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while HUBB trades at $419.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs NVT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while NVT trades at $74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs AYI Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while AYI trades at $296.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs BE Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while BE trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1294.00. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs AEIS Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while AEIS trades at $141.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 72.55. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs WIRE Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ENS Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ENS trades at $87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs HAYW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while HAYW trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ENVX Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ENVX trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs POWL Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while POWL trades at $210.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ATKR Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ATKR trades at $74.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs PLUG Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while PLUG trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs HOLI Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ENR Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ENR trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs AMPX-WT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while AMPX-WT trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs EOSEW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while EOSEW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs EOSE Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while EOSE trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs MVST Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while MVST trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs PLPC Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 829M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while PLPC trades at $164.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs AMPX Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 782.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while AMPX trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ADSE Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 619.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ADSE trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs KE Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while KE trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SLDP Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 469M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SLDP trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SES-WT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SES-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs LTBR Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while LTBR trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs AIRJ Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while AIRJ trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 51.56. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs EAF Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while EAF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs FREY Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs TE Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while TE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs NVX Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while NVX trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs NEOV Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while NEOV trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ELVA Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ELVA trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -94.75. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ULBI Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ULBI trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ESP Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ESP trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs FCEL Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while FCEL trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SVT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs RAYA Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while RAYA trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -64.25. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SKYX Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 109.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SKYX trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs OPTT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while OPTT trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs CBAT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while CBAT trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs MVSTW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while MVSTW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs RFIL Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while RFIL trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -51.07. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ADSEW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ADSEW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SLDPW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SLDPW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs IPWR Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while IPWR trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs NEOVW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while NEOVW trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs CHEV Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while CHEV trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs FLUX Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while FLUX trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs APWC Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while APWC trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs PPSI Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while PPSI trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs GWH-WT Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while GWH-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs OESX Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while OESX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs GWH Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while GWH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SDST Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SDST trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs CCTG Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while CCTG trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs STI Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while STI trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs PITA Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs NXU Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs POLA Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while POLA trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs XPON Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while XPON trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs DFLIW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs SDSTW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs DFLI Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while DFLI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs DCFCW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs DCFC Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs ENR-PA Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.
ELPW vs BLNKW Comparison
ELPW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELPW stands at 111.6M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELPW is priced at $2.09, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELPW currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELPW's ROE is +6.54%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELPW is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELPW.