Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
Echo Global Logistics, Inc. ECHO Peers
See (ECHO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECHO | $48.24 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UPS | $100.36 | +0.71% | 84.98B | 14.65 | $6.85 | +4.89% |
| FDX | $231.13 | -0.29% | 55.38B | 14.55 | $15.88 | +2.39% |
| EXPD | $115.02 | +0.65% | 15.75B | 19.11 | $6.02 | +1.27% |
| XPO | $125.70 | -1.58% | 14.81B | 38.68 | $3.25 | N/A |
| JBHT | $147.86 | -0.02% | 14.67B | 26.79 | $5.52 | +1.18% |
| ZTO | $18.15 | -3.25% | 14.59B | 12.26 | $1.48 | +3.81% |
| CHRW | $98.75 | +0.73% | 11.72B | 23.57 | $4.19 | +2.49% |
| LSTR | $144.59 | +1.50% | 5.05B | 28.69 | $5.04 | +2.14% |
| GXO | $41.32 | +0.61% | 4.73B | 66.65 | $0.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ECHO vs UPS Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 84.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while UPS trades at $100.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs FDX Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 55.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while FDX trades at $231.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs EXPD Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while EXPD trades at $115.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs XPO Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 14.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while XPO trades at $125.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 38.68. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs JBHT Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 14.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while JBHT trades at $147.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs ZTO Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 14.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while ZTO trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs CHRW Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 11.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while CHRW trades at $98.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs LSTR Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while LSTR trades at $144.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs GXO Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while GXO trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 66.65. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs HUBG Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while HUBG trades at $35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs PBI Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while PBI trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs FWRD Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 574.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while FWRD trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs AIRTP Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 413.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while AIRTP trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs CYRX Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 337.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while CYRX trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs RLGT Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 291.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while RLGT trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs PAL Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 218.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while PAL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -101.12. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs CRGO Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 111.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while CRGO trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs SINO Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs SFWL Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 84.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while SFWL trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs BTOC Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 65.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while BTOC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs FLX Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 56.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while FLX trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs AIRT Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 49.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while AIRT trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -64.46. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs JYD Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 27.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while JYD trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs NCEW Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 25.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while NCEW trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 118.00. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCEW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs CJMB Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 24.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while CJMB trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs GVH Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 21.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while GVH trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs HKPD Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 11.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while HKPD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HKPD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs PSIG Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 9.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while PSIG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs CRGOW Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 8.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while CRGOW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs LSH Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while LSH trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.
ECHO vs SGLY Comparison
ECHO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECHO stands at N/A. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 3.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ECHO is priced at $48.24, while SGLY trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECHO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ECHO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ECHO is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECHO.