Brinker International, Inc.
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | $144.02 | +3.85% | 6.3B | 14.53 | $9.91 | N/A |
| MCD | $326.46 | +0.79% | 233B | 27.34 | $11.94 | +2.23% |
| SBUX | $99.15 | -1.03% | 113B | 82.64 | $1.20 | +2.46% |
| YUM | $160.40 | +1.22% | 44.5B | 28.96 | $5.54 | +1.79% |
| CMG | $32.52 | -0.12% | 43B | 28.51 | $1.14 | N/A |
| QSR | $72.65 | +0.78% | 23.9B | 27.62 | $2.63 | +3.40% |
| DRI | $202.37 | +1.99% | 23.5B | 21.22 | $9.54 | +2.91% |
| YUMC | $52.70 | +0.40% | 18.6B | 21.00 | $2.51 | +1.91% |
| DPZ | $401.63 | +1.43% | 13.5B | 22.85 | $17.58 | +1.80% |
| TXRH | $170.24 | +0.47% | 11.3B | 27.91 | $6.10 | +1.59% |
Stock Comparison
EAT vs MCD Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 233B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while MCD trades at $326.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MCD's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MCD's competition here
EAT vs SBUX Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 113B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while SBUX trades at $99.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 82.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SBUX's competition here
EAT vs YUM Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while YUM trades at $160.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUM's competition here
EAT vs CMG Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CMG trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CMG's competition here
EAT vs QSR Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while QSR trades at $72.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check QSR's competition here
EAT vs DRI Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while DRI trades at $202.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DRI's competition here
EAT vs YUMC Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while YUMC trades at $52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUMC's competition here
EAT vs DPZ Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while DPZ trades at $401.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DPZ's competition here
EAT vs TXRH Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while TXRH trades at $170.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TXRH's competition here
EAT vs CAVA Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CAVA trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 151.93. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAVA's competition here
EAT vs BROS Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BROS trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 75.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BROS's competition here
EAT vs WING Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while WING trades at $203.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WING's competition here
EAT vs SHAK Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while SHAK trades at $86.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 79.72. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SHAK's competition here
EAT vs CAKE Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CAKE trades at $57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAKE's competition here
EAT vs ARCO Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while ARCO trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARCO's competition here
EAT vs WEN Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while WEN trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WEN's competition here
EAT vs PZZA Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while PZZA trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PZZA's competition here
EAT vs BH-A Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 995.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BH-A trades at $1,597.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH-A's competition here
EAT vs BH Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 940.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BH trades at $300.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH's competition here
EAT vs HDL Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 927.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while HDL trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HDL's competition here
EAT vs TWNPV Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
EAT vs BJRI Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 708.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BJRI trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BJRI's competition here
EAT vs FWRG Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 704.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FWRG trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FWRG's competition here
EAT vs KRUS Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 697.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while KRUS trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -174.52. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check KRUS's competition here
EAT vs RUTH Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RUTH's competition here
EAT vs CHUY Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHUY's competition here
EAT vs SG Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 632M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while SG trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SG's competition here
EAT vs CBRL Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 625.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CBRL trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is -139.95. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CBRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CBRL's competition here
EAT vs CNNE Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 595.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CNNE trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CNNE's competition here
EAT vs PBPB Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PBPB's competition here
EAT vs TAST Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TAST's competition here
EAT vs BLMN Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 469.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BLMN trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BLMN's competition here
EAT vs NATH Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 410.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while NATH trades at $100.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NATH's competition here
EAT vs DIN Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while DIN trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DIN's competition here
EAT vs PTLO Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 384.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while PTLO trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PTLO's competition here
EAT vs LOCO Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while LOCO trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LOCO's competition here
EAT vs DENN Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DENN's competition here
EAT vs JACK Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while JACK trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JACK's competition here
EAT vs FRGI Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FRGI's competition here
EAT vs RICK Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while RICK trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RICK's competition here
EAT vs BBQ Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BBQ's competition here
EAT vs VENU Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while VENU trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VENU's competition here
EAT vs THCHW Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCHW's competition here
EAT vs MB Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while MB trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MB's competition here
EAT vs THCH Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while THCH trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCH's competition here
EAT vs BDL Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BDL trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BDL's competition here
EAT vs RRGB Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while RRGB trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RRGB's competition here
EAT vs GRIL Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GRIL's competition here
EAT vs FATAV Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATAV's competition here
EAT vs STKS Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while STKS trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check STKS's competition here
EAT vs GENK Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while GENK trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GENK's competition here
EAT vs FATBW Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBW's competition here
EAT vs RAVE Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while RAVE trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RAVE's competition here
EAT vs NDLS Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while NDLS trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NDLS's competition here
EAT vs PC Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PC's competition here
EAT vs ARKR Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while ARKR trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARKR's competition here
EAT vs HCHL Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while HCHL trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HCHL's competition here
EAT vs MYT Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MYT's competition here
EAT vs FATBB Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBB's competition here
EAT vs GTIM Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while GTIM trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GTIM's competition here
EAT vs REBN Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while REBN trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to REBN's ROE of +22.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check REBN's competition here
EAT vs YOSH Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YOSH's competition here
EAT vs BTBD Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BTBD trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBD's competition here
EAT vs BTB Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTB's competition here
EAT vs FATBV Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBV's competition here
EAT vs FAT Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FAT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FAT's competition here
EAT vs TWNP Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNP's competition here
EAT vs CHSN Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while CHSN trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHSN's competition here
EAT vs BFI Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFI's competition here
EAT vs PNST Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while PNST trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNST's competition here
EAT vs FATBP Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBP's competition here
EAT vs BTBDW Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BTBDW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
EAT vs BFIIW Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
EAT vs ONDR Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ONDR's competition here
EAT vs LUB Comparison March 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $144.02, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.53, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LUB's competition here