Brinker International, Inc.
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | $153.50 | +0.77% | 6.8B | 21.34 | $7.19 | N/A |
| MCD | $298.47 | +1.35% | 213.4B | 26.32 | $11.34 | +2.35% |
| SBUX | $94.42 | +0.77% | 107.3B | 34.33 | $2.75 | +2.55% |
| CMG | $46.76 | +2.23% | 63B | 41.38 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $146.70 | +0.60% | 40.8B | 29.23 | $5.02 | +1.88% |
| DRI | $204.48 | +0.83% | 23.9B | 23.03 | $8.88 | +2.79% |
| QSR | $69.56 | -0.66% | 22.8B | 23.59 | $2.95 | +3.45% |
| YUMC | $47.85 | -1.80% | 17.9B | 20.02 | $2.39 | +1.67% |
| DPZ | $485.53 | +1.93% | 16.5B | 28.16 | $17.24 | +1.34% |
| TXRH | $188.14 | +2.14% | 12.5B | 29.05 | $6.48 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
EAT vs MCD Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while MCD trades at $298.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MCD's competition here
EAT vs SBUX Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while SBUX trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SBUX's competition here
EAT vs CMG Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CMG trades at $46.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CMG's competition here
EAT vs YUM Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while YUM trades at $146.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUM's competition here
EAT vs DRI Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while DRI trades at $204.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DRI's competition here
EAT vs QSR Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while QSR trades at $69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT and QSR have similar daily volatility (1.69).Check QSR's competition here
EAT vs YUMC Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while YUMC trades at $47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUMC's competition here
EAT vs DPZ Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while DPZ trades at $485.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DPZ's competition here
EAT vs TXRH Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while TXRH trades at $188.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TXRH's competition here
EAT vs BROS Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BROS trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 152.56. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BROS's competition here
EAT vs CAVA Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CAVA trades at $88.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 73.32. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAVA's competition here
EAT vs WING Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while WING trades at $302.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 50.59. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WING's competition here
EAT vs SHAK Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while SHAK trades at $137.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 473.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SHAK's competition here
EAT vs CAKE Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CAKE trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAKE's competition here
EAT vs WEN Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while WEN trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WEN's competition here
EAT vs SG Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while SG trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SG's competition here
EAT vs ARCO Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while ARCO trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARCO's competition here
EAT vs CBRL Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CBRL trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CBRL's competition here
EAT vs PZZA Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while PZZA trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PZZA's competition here
EAT vs CNNE Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CNNE trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CNNE's competition here
EAT vs HDL Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while HDL trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HDL's competition here
EAT vs KRUS Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while KRUS trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -110.20. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check KRUS's competition here
EAT vs FWRG Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FWRG trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 101.65. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FWRG's competition here
EAT vs BH-A Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BH-A trades at $1,561.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH-A's competition here
EAT vs BH Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 977.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BH trades at $319.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH's competition here
EAT vs BJRI Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 861.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BJRI trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BJRI's competition here
EAT vs TWNPV Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
EAT vs BLMN Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 854.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BLMN trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BLMN's competition here
EAT vs RUTH Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RUTH's competition here
EAT vs PTLO Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 678M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while PTLO trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PTLO's competition here
EAT vs CHUY Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHUY's competition here
EAT vs VENU Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while VENU trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VENU's competition here
EAT vs TAST Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TAST's competition here
EAT vs JACK Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while JACK trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JACK's competition here
EAT vs NATH Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while NATH trades at $95.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NATH's competition here
EAT vs DIN Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while DIN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DIN's competition here
EAT vs PBPB Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while PBPB trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PBPB's competition here
EAT vs RICK Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while RICK trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RICK's competition here
EAT vs LOCO Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 323.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while LOCO trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LOCO's competition here
EAT vs TWNP Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 267.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while TWNP trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNP's competition here
EAT vs MB Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 237.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while MB trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MB's competition here
EAT vs FRGI Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FRGI's competition here
EAT vs DENN Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 214.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while DENN trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DENN's competition here
EAT vs BBQ Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BBQ's competition here
EAT vs RRGB Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while RRGB trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RRGB's competition here
EAT vs STKS Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while STKS trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check STKS's competition here
EAT vs THCHW Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCHW's competition here
EAT vs THCH Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while THCH trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCH's competition here
EAT vs BDL Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BDL trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BDL's competition here
EAT vs GRIL Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GRIL's competition here
EAT vs FATAV Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATAV's competition here
EAT vs FATBW Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBW's competition here
EAT vs FATBP Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FATBP trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBP's competition here
EAT vs FAT Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FAT trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FAT's competition here
EAT vs NDLS Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while NDLS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NDLS's competition here
EAT vs FATBB Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FATBB trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBB's competition here
EAT vs RAVE Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while RAVE trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RAVE's competition here
EAT vs ARKR Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while ARKR trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARKR's competition here
EAT vs MYT Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MYT's competition here
EAT vs GENK Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while GENK trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -103.87. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GENK's competition here
EAT vs GTIM Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while GTIM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GTIM's competition here
EAT vs REBN Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while REBN trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to REBN's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check REBN's competition here
EAT vs YOSH Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while YOSH trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YOSH's competition here
EAT vs PC Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while PC trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PC's competition here
EAT vs BTBD Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BTBD trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBD's competition here
EAT vs BTBDW Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BTBDW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
EAT vs BTB Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTB's competition here
EAT vs FATBV Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBV's competition here
EAT vs CHSN Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while CHSN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHSN's competition here
EAT vs PNST Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNST's competition here
EAT vs BFI Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFI's competition here
EAT vs BFIIW Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
EAT vs ONDR Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ONDR's competition here
EAT vs LUB Comparison July 2025
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $153.50, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.34, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +3.01%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LUB's competition here