GrafTech International Ltd.
GrafTech International Ltd. EAF Peers
See (EAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAF | $1.00 | -9.91% | 280.1M | -2.01 | -$0.54 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $127.74 | +3.18% | 48.5B | 73.94 | $1.72 | +0.11% |
| HUBB | $407.15 | +0.47% | 21.7B | 27.47 | $14.80 | +1.28% |
| NVT | $73.07 | -0.08% | 12.1B | 50.94 | $1.44 | +1.06% |
| AYI | $300.70 | -1.14% | 9.4B | 23.96 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
| BE | $23.58 | +5.58% | 5.2B | 1110.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $132.73 | -0.83% | 5B | 66.86 | $1.98 | +0.30% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| ENS | $86.63 | +0.40% | 3.3B | 9.65 | $8.99 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
EAF vs ABB Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs VRT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while VRT trades at $127.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 73.94. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs HUBB Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while HUBB trades at $407.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs NVT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while NVT trades at $73.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 50.94. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs AYI Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while AYI trades at $300.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs BE Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while BE trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1110.00. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs AEIS Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while AEIS trades at $132.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 66.86. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs WIRE Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ENS Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ENS trades at $86.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs HAYW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while HAYW trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs POWL Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while POWL trades at $211.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ATKR Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ATKR trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ENVX Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ENVX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs HOLI Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ENR Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ENR trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs PLUG Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while PLUG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs MVST Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while MVST trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs EOSE Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while EOSE trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs EOSEW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 920M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while EOSEW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs PLPC Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 785.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while PLPC trades at $159.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ADSE Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ADSE trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs AMPX Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 491.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while AMPX trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs AMPX-WT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 471M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs KE Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 468.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while KE trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SLDP Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 385.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SLDP trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SES-WT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 324.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SES-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs LTBR Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while LTBR trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs AIRJ Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while AIRJ trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs FREY Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs TE Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while TE trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs NVX Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while NVX trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ULBI Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ULBI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ESP Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 131.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ESP trades at $46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ELVA Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ELVA trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -81.50. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SKYX Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SKYX trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs FCEL Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while FCEL trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs MVSTW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 122M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while MVSTW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SVT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SVT trades at $47.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.50. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs NEOV Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while NEOV trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -28.92. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs CBAT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while CBAT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ADSEW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ADSEW trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs OPTT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while OPTT trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs RAYA Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while RAYA trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -47.75. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs RFIL Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while RFIL trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -35.31. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SLDPW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SLDPW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs CHEV Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while CHEV trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -55.56. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ELPW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ELPW trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs NEOVW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while NEOVW trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs IPWR Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while IPWR trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs APWC Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while APWC trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs PPSI Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while PPSI trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs FLUX Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while FLUX trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs OESX Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while OESX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs GWH Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while GWH trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs CCTG Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while CCTG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs GWH-WT Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SDST Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SDST trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs PITA Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs STI Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while STI trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs NXU Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs POLA Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while POLA trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs DCFC Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs XPON Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while XPON trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs DFLIW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while DFLIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs SDSTW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs DFLI Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while DFLI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs DCFCW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs ENR-PA Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.
EAF vs BLNKW Comparison
EAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAF stands at 280.1M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAF is priced at $1.00, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAF's ROE is +3.23%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAF is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAF.