Tritium DCFC Limited
Tritium DCFC Limited DCFC Peers
See (DCFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCFC | $3.64 | +0.00% | 3.9M | -0.02 | -$156.00 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $124.33 | +1.46% | 47.4B | 72.28 | $1.72 | +0.11% |
| HUBB | $415.12 | +1.12% | 22.2B | 28.04 | $14.80 | +1.25% |
| NVT | $73.44 | +1.77% | 12.1B | 51.01 | $1.44 | +1.06% |
| AYI | $306.02 | -0.17% | 9.4B | 24.12 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
| BE | $22.56 | +1.94% | 5.2B | 1128.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $137.55 | +2.96% | 5.2B | 69.51 | $1.98 | +0.29% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| ENS | $89.98 | +1.39% | 3.5B | 10.00 | $8.99 | +1.06% |
Stock Comparison
DCFC vs ABB Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs VRT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while VRT trades at $124.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 72.28. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs HUBB Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while HUBB trades at $415.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs NVT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while NVT trades at $73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 51.01. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs AYI Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while AYI trades at $306.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs BE Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while BE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1128.00. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs AEIS Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while AEIS trades at $137.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 69.51. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs WIRE Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ENS Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ENS trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs HAYW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while HAYW trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs POWL Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while POWL trades at $218.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ATKR Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ATKR trades at $75.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ENVX Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ENVX trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs HOLI Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs PLUG Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while PLUG trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ENR Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ENR trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs EOSEW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while EOSEW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs EOSE Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while EOSE trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs MVST Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while MVST trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs PLPC Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 825.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while PLPC trades at $167.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ADSE Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 677.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ADSE trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs AMPX Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while AMPX trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs AMPX-WT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs KE Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 489.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while KE trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SES-WT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 480.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SES-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SLDP Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 443.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SLDP trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs AIRJ Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 311.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while AIRJ trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs LTBR Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 295.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while LTBR trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs EAF Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while EAF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs FREY Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs TE Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while TE trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs NVX Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while NVX trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ULBI Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ULBI trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ELVA Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ELVA trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ESP Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ESP trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs FCEL Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while FCEL trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SVT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SKYX Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SKYX trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs NEOV Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while NEOV trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -26.92. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs MVSTW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while MVSTW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs CBAT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while CBAT trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs RAYA Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while RAYA trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs OPTT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while OPTT trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ADSEW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ADSEW trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SLDPW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SLDPW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs RFIL Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while RFIL trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -45.86. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ELPW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ELPW trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs CHEV Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while CHEV trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs NEOVW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while NEOVW trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs IPWR Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while IPWR trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs APWC Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while APWC trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs PPSI Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while PPSI trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs FLUX Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while FLUX trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs GWH Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while GWH trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs OESX Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while OESX trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs GWH-WT Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while GWH-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SDST Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SDST trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs CCTG Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while CCTG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs STI Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while STI trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs PITA Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs NXU Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs POLA Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while POLA trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs XPON Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while XPON trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs DFLIW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while DFLIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs SDSTW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs DFLI Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while DFLI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs DCFCW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs ENR-PA Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.
DCFC vs BLNKW Comparison
DCFC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DCFC stands at 3.9M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DCFC is priced at $3.64, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DCFC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DCFC's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DCFC is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DCFC.