Digital Brands Group, Inc.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. DBGIW Peers
See (DBGIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBGIW | $16.00 | +26.88% | 30.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TJX | $123.49 | +0.09% | 137.7B | 29.05 | $4.25 | +1.26% |
| ROST | $127.58 | -0.25% | 41.7B | 20.15 | $6.33 | +1.22% |
| LULU | $237.58 | +1.09% | 27.3B | 16.15 | $14.71 | N/A |
| ONON | $52.05 | -0.84% | 16.9B | 66.73 | $0.78 | N/A |
| BURL | $232.64 | +0.87% | 14.7B | 28.51 | $8.16 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.82% |
| GAP | $21.81 | -0.41% | 8.1B | 9.48 | $2.30 | +2.82% |
| URBN | $72.54 | +4.52% | 6.5B | 15.21 | $4.77 | N/A |
| BOOT | $152.00 | -1.65% | 4.6B | 25.88 | $5.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DBGIW vs TJX Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TJX trades at $123.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ROST Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ROST trades at $127.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs LULU Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LULU trades at $237.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ONON Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ONON trades at $52.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 66.73. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BURL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BURL trades at $232.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GPS Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GAP Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GAP trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs URBN Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while URBN trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BOOT Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BOOT trades at $152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ANF Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ANF trades at $82.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs FL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while FL trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BKE Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BKE trades at $45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs AEO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while AEO trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs VSCO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while VSCO trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CRI Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CRI trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs HIBB Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CHS Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GES Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 628.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GES trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -109.91. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs SCVL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 511.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SCVL trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs SFIX Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SFIX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CURV Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CURV trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CTRN Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 276.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CTRN trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ZUMZ Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ZUMZ trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -663.00. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GCO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 212.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GCO trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs JILL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while JILL trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DBI Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBI trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs PLCE Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while PLCE trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BIRD Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BIRD trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DLTH Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DLTH trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DXLG Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DXLG trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CATO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CATO trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs TLYS Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TLYS trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DBGI Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBGI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs RENT Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while RENT trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs LVLU Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LVLU trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs EXPR Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.