Digital Brands Group, Inc.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DBGIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBGIW | $16.00 | +26.88% | 30.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TJX | $125.39 | -0.83% | 139.9B | 29.51 | $4.25 | +1.24% |
| ROST | $140.82 | +1.80% | 46.1B | 22.21 | $6.34 | +1.10% |
| LULU | $216.59 | -1.29% | 24.8B | 14.73 | $14.70 | N/A |
| BURL | $287.99 | +3.07% | 18.2B | 35.31 | $8.16 | N/A |
| ONON | $50.95 | +0.37% | 16.5B | 63.71 | $0.80 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +3.08% |
| GAP | $20.40 | -1.23% | 7.6B | 8.86 | $2.30 | +3.08% |
| URBN | $77.72 | +2.79% | 7B | 16.29 | $4.77 | N/A |
| BOOT | $178.66 | +2.38% | 5.5B | 30.39 | $5.88 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DBGIW vs TJX Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TJX trades at $125.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check TJX's competition here
DBGIW vs ROST Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ROST trades at $140.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ROST's competition here
DBGIW vs LULU Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LULU trades at $216.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check LULU's competition here
DBGIW vs BURL Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BURL trades at $287.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BURL's competition here
DBGIW vs ONON Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ONON trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ONON's competition here
DBGIW vs GPS Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GPS's competition here
DBGIW vs GAP Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GAP trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GAP's competition here
DBGIW vs URBN Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while URBN trades at $77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check URBN's competition here
DBGIW vs BOOT Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BOOT trades at $178.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BOOT's competition here
DBGIW vs ANF Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ANF trades at $98.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ANF's competition here
DBGIW vs BKE Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BKE trades at $50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BKE's competition here
DBGIW vs FL Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while FL trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check FL's competition here
DBGIW vs AEO Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while AEO trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check AEO's competition here
DBGIW vs VSCO Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while VSCO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check VSCO's competition here
DBGIW vs HIBB Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check HIBB's competition here
DBGIW vs CRI Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 966.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CRI trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CRI's competition here
DBGIW vs CHS Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CHS's competition here
DBGIW vs GES Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 714.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GES trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -124.82. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GES's competition here
DBGIW vs SFIX Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 687.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SFIX trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check SFIX's competition here
DBGIW vs SCVL Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 612M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SCVL trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check SCVL's competition here
DBGIW vs CURV Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CURV trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CURV's competition here
DBGIW vs GCO Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 273.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GCO trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GCO's competition here
DBGIW vs ZUMZ Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 269.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ZUMZ trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -757.50. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ZUMZ's competition here
DBGIW vs CTRN Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CTRN trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CTRN's competition here
DBGIW vs JILL Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while JILL trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check JILL's competition here
DBGIW vs DBI Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBI trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DBI's competition here
DBGIW vs PLCE Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while PLCE trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check PLCE's competition here
DBGIW vs BIRD Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BIRD trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BIRD's competition here
DBGIW vs DLTH Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DLTH trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DLTH's competition here
DBGIW vs DXLG Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DXLG trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DXLG's competition here
DBGIW vs TLYS Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TLYS trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check TLYS's competition here
DBGIW vs CATO Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CATO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CATO's competition here
DBGIW vs DBGI Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBGI trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DBGI's competition here
DBGIW vs RENT Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while RENT trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check RENT's competition here
DBGIW vs LVLU Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LVLU trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check LVLU's competition here
DBGIW vs EXPR Comparison July 2025
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check EXPR's competition here