Digital Brands Group, Inc.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. DBGIW Peers
See (DBGIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBGIW | $16.00 | +26.88% | 30.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TJX | $128.45 | +0.85% | 143.3B | 30.22 | $4.25 | +1.21% |
| ROST | $143.80 | +1.10% | 47.3B | 22.72 | $6.33 | +1.05% |
| LULU | $265.27 | -19.80% | 30.5B | 18.06 | $14.69 | N/A |
| ONON | $56.55 | -0.70% | 18.3B | 73.44 | $0.77 | N/A |
| BURL | $245.87 | +1.21% | 15.5B | 30.06 | $8.18 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +1.22% |
| GAP | $21.94 | +1.69% | 8.2B | 9.54 | $2.30 | +2.79% |
| URBN | $70.02 | +0.44% | 6.3B | 14.68 | $4.77 | N/A |
| BOOT | $164.87 | -0.92% | 5B | 28.09 | $5.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DBGIW vs TJX Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 143.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TJX trades at $128.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ROST Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ROST trades at $143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs LULU Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LULU trades at $265.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ONON Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ONON trades at $56.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 73.44. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BURL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BURL trades at $245.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GPS Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GAP Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GAP trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs URBN Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while URBN trades at $70.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BOOT Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BOOT trades at $164.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ANF Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ANF trades at $83.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs FL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while FL trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to FL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BKE Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BKE trades at $43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs VSCO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while VSCO trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs AEO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while AEO trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CRI Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CRI trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs HIBB Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CHS Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GES Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 624.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GES trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -109.15. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs SFIX Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 597.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SFIX trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs SCVL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 535.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SCVL trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CURV Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 513.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CURV trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CTRN Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CTRN trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs JILL Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while JILL trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs GCO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GCO trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs ZUMZ Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ZUMZ trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -128.67. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DBI Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 185.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBI trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs PLCE Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while PLCE trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs BIRD Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BIRD trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DLTH Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DLTH trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DXLG Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DXLG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DXLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs DBGI Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBGI trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs CATO Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CATO trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs TLYS Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TLYS trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs RENT Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while RENT trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs LVLU Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LVLU trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.
DBGIW vs EXPR Comparison
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -7.60%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.