Freightos Limited
Freightos Limited CRGOW Peers
See (CRGOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGOW | $0.17 | +8.70% | 8.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UPS | $99.28 | +0.07% | 84.1B | 14.49 | $6.85 | +6.59% |
| FDX | $225.92 | +1.17% | 54.1B | 14.22 | $15.89 | +2.45% |
| EXPD | $113.60 | +0.46% | 15.6B | 18.87 | $6.02 | +1.33% |
| XPO | $119.92 | -0.58% | 14.1B | 36.90 | $3.25 | N/A |
| ZTO | $17.21 | +0.91% | 14B | 10.82 | $1.59 | +4.07% |
| JBHT | $139.63 | +0.45% | 13.9B | 25.34 | $5.51 | +1.25% |
| CHRW | $92.63 | -0.84% | 11B | 22.11 | $4.19 | +2.67% |
| GXO | $47.97 | +12.14% | 5.5B | 77.37 | $0.62 | N/A |
| LSTR | $136.81 | -0.24% | 4.8B | 27.09 | $5.05 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
CRGOW vs UPS Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while UPS trades at $99.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs FDX Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while FDX trades at $225.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs EXPD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while EXPD trades at $113.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs XPO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while XPO trades at $119.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 36.90. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs ZTO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while ZTO trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs JBHT Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while JBHT trades at $139.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CHRW Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CHRW trades at $92.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs GXO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while GXO trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 77.37. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs LSTR Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while LSTR trades at $136.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs HUBG Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while HUBG trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs PBI Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while PBI trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs FWRD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 674.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while FWRD trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs AIRTP Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 410.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while AIRTP trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CYRX Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CYRX trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs RLGT Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while RLGT trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs PAL Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while PAL trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -97.86. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CRGO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CRGO trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs SINO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs SFWL Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while SFWL trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs BTOC Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while BTOC trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs FLX Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while FLX trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs AIRT Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while AIRT trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -71.46. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs GVH Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while GVH trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs NCEW Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while NCEW trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 98.52. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CJMB Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CJMB trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs JYD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while JYD trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs HKPD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while HKPD trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs PSIG Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while PSIG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs LSH Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while LSH trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs SGLY Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while SGLY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs ATXG Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while ATXG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs ECHO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs AIRTW Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.36%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.