Freightos Limited

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while UPS trades at $84.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check UPS's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while FDX trades at $217.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FDX's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while ZTO trades at $20.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check ZTO's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while EXPD trades at $114.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check EXPD's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while XPO trades at $118.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 41.08. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check XPO's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while CHRW trades at $113.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CHRW's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while JBHT trades at $139.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check JBHT's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while GXO trades at $48.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 77.47. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check GXO's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while LSTR trades at $128.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check LSTR's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while PBI trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check PBI's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while HUBG trades at $33.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check HUBG's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 888.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while FWRD trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FWRD's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 439.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while AIRTP trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 54.34. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check AIRTP's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 364.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while CYRX trades at $7.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CYRX's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while RLGT trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check RLGT's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while PAL trades at $6.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check PAL's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while CRGO trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CRGO's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while SINO trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check SINO's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while SFWL trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check SFWL's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while FLX trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check FLX's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while BTOC trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check BTOC's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while AIRT trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check AIRT's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while JYD trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check JYD's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while CJMB trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check CJMB's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while NCEW trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 68.98. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check NCEW's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while HKPD trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check HKPD's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while PSIG trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check PSIG's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while LSH trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check LSH's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while GVH trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check GVH's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while SGLY trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check SGLY's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while ATXG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check ATXG's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while ECHO trades at $48.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check ECHO's competition here

CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.24, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.Check AIRTW's competition here