Freightos Limited
Freightos Limited CRGOW Peers
See (CRGOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGOW | $0.17 | -5.10% | 8.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UPS | $101.27 | -1.60% | 85.8B | 14.79 | $6.85 | +6.43% |
| FDX | $236.06 | -1.12% | 56.6B | 14.05 | $16.80 | +2.95% |
| EXPD | $115.76 | -2.93% | 15.8B | 19.18 | $6.03 | +1.93% |
| XPO | $132.35 | -1.19% | 15.6B | 40.73 | $3.25 | N/A |
| JBHT | $153.57 | -0.70% | 15.2B | 27.92 | $5.50 | +1.41% |
| ZTO | $18.69 | -3.31% | 15.1B | 11.77 | $1.59 | +3.73% |
| CHRW | $99.40 | -1.43% | 11.8B | 23.73 | $4.19 | +3.10% |
| GXO | $51.77 | +0.21% | 5.9B | 83.48 | $0.62 | N/A |
| LSTR | $143.26 | -1.69% | 5B | 28.41 | $5.04 | +2.43% |
Stock Comparison
CRGOW vs UPS Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while UPS trades at $101.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs FDX Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while FDX trades at $236.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs EXPD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while EXPD trades at $115.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs XPO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while XPO trades at $132.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 40.73. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs JBHT Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while JBHT trades at $153.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs ZTO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while ZTO trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CHRW Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CHRW trades at $99.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs GXO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while GXO trades at $51.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 83.48. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs LSTR Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while LSTR trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs HUBG Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while HUBG trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs PBI Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while PBI trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs FWRD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 831.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while FWRD trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs AIRTP Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while AIRTP trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 51.34. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CYRX Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 378.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CYRX trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs RLGT Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 289M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while RLGT trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs PAL Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while PAL trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -113.14. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs CRGO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CRGO trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs SINO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs SFWL Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while SFWL trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs FLX Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while FLX trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs BTOC Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while BTOC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs AIRT Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while AIRT trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW and AIRT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRGOW vs CJMB Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while CJMB trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs NCEW Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while NCEW trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs JYD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while JYD trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs HKPD Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while HKPD trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs PSIG Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while PSIG trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs LSH Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while LSH trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSH's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs SGLY Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while SGLY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs ATXG Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while ATXG trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs GVH Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while GVH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs ECHO Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.
CRGOW vs AIRTW Comparison
CRGOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRGOW stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRGOW is priced at $0.17, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRGOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRGOW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRGOW is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRGOW.