CNO Financial Group, Inc.
CNO Financial Group, Inc. (CNO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNO | $39.87 | +0.25% | 3.8B | 17.33 | $2.30 | +1.70% |
| AFL | $108.71 | -0.84% | 56.1B | 15.94 | $6.82 | +2.15% |
| MFC | $33.41 | -0.27% | 56B | 14.79 | $2.26 | +3.89% |
| MET-PE | $23.14 | -0.98% | 48.9B | 2.97 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| MET | $67.97 | -1.19% | 44.8B | 14.43 | $4.71 | +3.32% |
| MET-PA | $21.53 | +0.13% | 41.8B | 2.76 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| PUK | $28.64 | -1.51% | 37.4B | 11.14 | $2.57 | +1.64% |
| PRU | $92.00 | -0.37% | 32B | 9.21 | $9.99 | +5.90% |
| MET-PF | $18.90 | -0.84% | 12.3B | 2.42 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| UNM | $72.16 | -0.73% | 12.1B | 16.90 | $4.27 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
CNO vs AFL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while AFL trades at $108.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AFL's competition here
CNO vs MFC Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MFC trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MFC's competition here
CNO vs MET-PE Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MET-PE trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET-PE's competition here
CNO vs MET Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MET trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET's competition here
CNO vs MET-PA Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MET-PA trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET-PA's competition here
CNO vs PUK Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while PUK trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PUK's competition here
CNO vs PRU Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while PRU trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PRU's competition here
CNO vs MET-PF Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MET-PF trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET-PF's competition here
CNO vs UNM Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while UNM trades at $72.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check UNM's competition here
CNO vs GL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while GL trades at $138.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GL's competition here
CNO vs PRH Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while PRH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNO has daily volatility of 2.31 and PRH has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRH's competition here
CNO vs PRS Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while PRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNO has daily volatility of 2.31 and PRS has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRS's competition here
CNO vs PRI Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while PRI trades at $249.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PRI's competition here
CNO vs JXN Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while JXN trades at $104.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -436.21. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check JXN's competition here
CNO vs LNC Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while LNC trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LNC's competition here
CNO vs LNC-PD Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while LNC-PD trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LNC-PD's competition here
CNO vs AEL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AEL's competition here
CNO vs FGN Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while FGN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNO has daily volatility of 2.31 and FGN has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGN's competition here
CNO vs BHF Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while BHF trades at $60.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHF's competition here
CNO vs GNW Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while GNW trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GNW's competition here
CNO vs FG Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while FG trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check FG's competition here
CNO vs BHFAP Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while BHFAP trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAP's competition here
CNO vs ABLLL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while ABLLL trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABLLL's competition here
CNO vs BHFAL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while BHFAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNO has daily volatility of 2.31 and BHFAL has daily volatility of N/A.Check BHFAL's competition here
CNO vs MLCIL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MLCIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNO has daily volatility of 2.31 and MLCIL has daily volatility of N/A.Check MLCIL's competition here
CNO vs JXN-PA Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while JXN-PA trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check JXN-PA's competition here
CNO vs AEL-PB Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AEL-PB's competition here
CNO vs NWLI Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check NWLI's competition here
CNO vs AEL-PA Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AEL-PA's competition here
CNO vs MHNC Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MHNC trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MHNC's competition here
CNO vs GL-PD Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while GL-PD trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GL-PD's competition here
CNO vs ABL Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 987.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while ABL trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABL's competition here
CNO vs ABX Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 959M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while ABX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 196.20. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABX's competition here
CNO vs BHFAO Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 928.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while BHFAO trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAO's competition here
CNO vs LIFE Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 762.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while LIFE trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LIFE's competition here
CNO vs BHFAN Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 732M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while BHFAN trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAN's competition here
CNO vs BHFAM Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 647.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while BHFAM trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAM's competition here
CNO vs ABLLW Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABLLW's competition here
CNO vs CIA Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 231.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while CIA trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check CIA's competition here
CNO vs VERY Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check VERY's competition here
CNO vs MDWT Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MDWT's competition here
CNO vs AAME Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while AAME trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AAME's competition here
CNO vs GWGH Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GWGH's competition here
CNO vs LFC Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LFC's competition here
CNO vs IHC Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check IHC's competition here
CNO vs MLG Comparison March 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $39.87, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.33, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MLG's competition here