Chico's FAS, Inc.
Chico's FAS, Inc. (CHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHS | $7.59 | -0.13% | 937M | 8.34 | $0.91 | N/A |
| TJX | $156.51 | +0.00% | 176.1B | 34.93 | $4.53 | +1.08% |
| ROST | $200.38 | +0.00% | 65.5B | 31.53 | $6.39 | +0.81% |
| LULU | $182.88 | +0.00% | 21B | 12.96 | $14.45 | N/A |
| BURL | $312.80 | +0.00% | 19.8B | 35.99 | $8.76 | N/A |
| ONON | $48.02 | +0.00% | 16.3B | 56.83 | $0.87 | N/A |
| GAP | $28.22 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 12.96 | $2.22 | +2.30% |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| URBN | $68.97 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 12.95 | $5.28 | N/A |
| BOOT | $196.89 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 27.98 | $7.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CHS vs TJX Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 176.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TJX trades at $156.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TJX's competition here
CHS vs ROST Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ROST trades at $200.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ROST's competition here
CHS vs LULU Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LULU trades at $182.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LULU's competition here
CHS vs BURL Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BURL trades at $312.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BURL's competition here
CHS vs ONON Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ONON trades at $48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ONON's competition here
CHS vs GAP Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GAP trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GAP's competition here
CHS vs GPS Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GPS's competition here
CHS vs URBN Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while URBN trades at $68.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check URBN's competition here
CHS vs BOOT Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BOOT trades at $196.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BOOT's competition here
CHS vs VSCO Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while VSCO trades at $61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check VSCO's competition here
CHS vs ANF Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ANF trades at $95.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ANF's competition here
CHS vs AEO Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while AEO trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check AEO's competition here
CHS vs BKE Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BKE trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BKE's competition here
CHS vs FL Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check FL's competition here
CHS vs CRI Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CRI trades at $42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CRI's competition here
CHS vs HIBB Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check HIBB's competition here
CHS vs GES Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GES's competition here
CHS vs SCVL Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SCVL trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SCVL's competition here
CHS vs SFIX Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 467M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SFIX trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SFIX's competition here
CHS vs ZUMZ Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 453.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ZUMZ trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 65.29. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ZUMZ's competition here
CHS vs CTRN Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CTRN trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -23.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CTRN's competition here
CHS vs DBI Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBI trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBI's competition here
CHS vs GCO Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GCO trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -133.07. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GCO's competition here
CHS vs JILL Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while JILL trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check JILL's competition here
CHS vs CURV Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CURV trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CURV's competition here
CHS vs PLCE Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while PLCE trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check PLCE's competition here
CHS vs DLTH Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DLTH trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DLTH's competition here
CHS vs CATO Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CATO trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CATO's competition here
CHS vs LVLU Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LVLU trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -6.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LVLU's competition here
CHS vs TLYS Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TLYS trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TLYS's competition here
CHS vs DXLG Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DXLG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DXLG's competition here
CHS vs DBGIW Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBGIW's competition here
CHS vs RENT Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while RENT trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check RENT's competition here
CHS vs BIRD Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BIRD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BIRD's competition here
CHS vs DBGI Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBGI trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBGI's competition here
CHS vs EXPR Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check EXPR's competition here
CHS vs JEM Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while JEM trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check JEM's competition here
CHS vs COX Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check COX's competition here
CHS vs TSA Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TSA's competition here
CHS vs CLE Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CLE's competition here
CHS vs LDG Comparison February 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LDG's competition here