Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG-PD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CFG-PD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFG-PD | $24.99 | +0.02% | 14.9B | 5.29 | $4.72 | +3.54% |
| HDB | $75.88 | +0.20% | 191.1B | 24.99 | $2.99 | +0.88% |
| IBN | $32.97 | +0.40% | 117.3B | 19.68 | $1.67 | +0.73% |
| MFG | $6.08 | -0.98% | 78.2B | 13.03 | $0.48 | +2.51% |
| PNC | $188.56 | +0.77% | 74.7B | 12.97 | $14.63 | +3.43% |
| USB | $44.44 | +0.79% | 69.9B | 10.73 | $4.18 | +4.46% |
| DB | $34.73 | -2.50% | 69.8B | 12.81 | $2.83 | +2.13% |
| USB-PS | $18.99 | +0.80% | 69.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.46% |
| USB-PP | $23.06 | +0.04% | 68.9B | 4.97 | $4.64 | +4.46% |
| USB-PA | $828.05 | -0.61% | 68.7B | 237.36 | $3.51 | +4.46% |
Stock Comparison
CFG-PD vs HDB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 191.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HDB trades at $75.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HDB's competition here
CFG-PD vs IBN Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while IBN trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check IBN's competition here
CFG-PD vs MFG Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while MFG trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check MFG's competition here
CFG-PD vs PNC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while PNC trades at $188.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check PNC's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB's competition here
CFG-PD vs DB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while DB trades at $34.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check DB's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB-PS Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB-PS trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB-PS's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB-PP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB-PP trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB-PP's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB-PA Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB-PA trades at $828.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 237.36. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB-PA's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB-PH Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB-PH trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB-PH's competition here
CFG-PD vs ITUB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while ITUB trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check ITUB's competition here
CFG-PD vs LYG Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while LYG trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check LYG's competition here
CFG-PD vs TFC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while TFC trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check TFC's competition here
CFG-PD vs HBANL Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HBANL trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HBANL's competition here
CFG-PD vs BSBR Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BSBR trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BSBR's competition here
CFG-PD vs HBANM Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HBANM trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HBANM's competition here
CFG-PD vs KB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while KB trades at $83.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check KB's competition here
CFG-PD vs MTB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while MTB trades at $185.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check MTB's competition here
CFG-PD vs BBDO Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BBDO trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BBDO's competition here
CFG-PD vs BBD Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BBD trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BBD's competition here
CFG-PD vs TFC-PO Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while TFC-PO trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check TFC-PO's competition here
CFG-PD vs FITB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FITB trades at $41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FITB's competition here
CFG-PD vs KEY-PL Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while KEY-PL trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check KEY-PL's competition here
CFG-PD vs TFC-PI Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while TFC-PI trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check TFC-PI's competition here
CFG-PD vs HBANP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HBANP trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HBANP's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB-PR Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB-PR trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB-PR's competition here
CFG-PD vs TFC-PR Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while TFC-PR trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check TFC-PR's competition here
CFG-PD vs SHG Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while SHG trades at $49.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check SHG's competition here
CFG-PD vs USB-PQ Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while USB-PQ trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check USB-PQ's competition here
CFG-PD vs FCNCA Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FCNCA trades at $1,848.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FCNCA's competition here
CFG-PD vs FCNCP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FCNCP trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FCNCP's competition here
CFG-PD vs FCNCO Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FCNCO trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FCNCO's competition here
CFG-PD vs HBAN Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HBAN trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HBAN's competition here
CFG-PD vs RF-PF Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while RF-PF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check RF-PF's competition here
CFG-PD vs RF Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while RF trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check RF's competition here
CFG-PD vs RF-PC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while RF-PC trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check RF-PC's competition here
CFG-PD vs CFG Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CFG trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CFG's competition here
CFG-PD vs BAP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BAP trades at $242.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BAP's competition here
CFG-PD vs KEY Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while KEY trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -220.12. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check KEY's competition here
CFG-PD vs KEY-PJ Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while KEY-PJ trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
CFG-PD vs KEY-PK Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while KEY-PK trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check KEY-PK's competition here
CFG-PD vs KEY-PI Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while KEY-PI trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check KEY-PI's competition here
CFG-PD vs FITBI Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FITBI trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FITBI's competition here
CFG-PD vs FITBP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FITBP trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FITBP's competition here
CFG-PD vs RF-PE Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while RF-PE trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check RF-PE's competition here
CFG-PD vs BCH Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BCH trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BCH's competition here
CFG-PD vs VLYPN Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while VLYPN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check VLYPN's competition here
CFG-PD vs WF Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while WF trades at $54.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check WF's competition here
CFG-PD vs FITBO Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FITBO trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FITBO's competition here
CFG-PD vs FHN-PB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD and FHN-PB have similar daily volatility (0.04).Check FHN-PB's competition here
CFG-PD vs FHN-PC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FHN-PC trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FHN-PC's competition here
CFG-PD vs FHN-PE Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FHN-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FHN-PE's competition here
CFG-PD vs CFG-PH Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CFG-PH trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CFG-PH's competition here
CFG-PD vs CIB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CIB trades at $45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CIB's competition here
CFG-PD vs BSAC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BSAC trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BSAC's competition here
CFG-PD vs FHN Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FHN trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FHN's competition here
CFG-PD vs CUBI-PE Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CUBI-PE trades at $326.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
CFG-PD vs WBS Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while WBS trades at $56.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check WBS's competition here
CFG-PD vs SSB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while SSB trades at $93.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check SSB's competition here
CFG-PD vs FHN-PF Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FHN-PF trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FHN-PF's competition here
CFG-PD vs FHN-PD Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FHN-PD's competition here
CFG-PD vs WAL Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while WAL trades at $77.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check WAL's competition here
CFG-PD vs CMA Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CMA trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CMA's competition here
CFG-PD vs CFG-PE Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CFG-PE trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CFG-PE's competition here
CFG-PD vs UMBF Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while UMBF trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check UMBF's competition here
CFG-PD vs WTFC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while WTFC trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check WTFC's competition here
CFG-PD vs ONBPP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while ONBPP trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check ONBPP's competition here
CFG-PD vs ONB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while ONB trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check ONB's competition here
CFG-PD vs ONBPO Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while ONBPO trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check ONBPO's competition here
CFG-PD vs CBSH Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CBSH trades at $60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CBSH's competition here
CFG-PD vs GGAL Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while GGAL trades at $53.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check GGAL's competition here
CFG-PD vs CFR Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CFR trades at $123.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CFR's competition here
CFG-PD vs BPOP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BPOP trades at $114.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BPOP's competition here
CFG-PD vs ZION Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while ZION trades at $51.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check ZION's competition here
CFG-PD vs BSMX Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BSMX's competition here
CFG-PD vs PNFP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while PNFP trades at $89.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check PNFP's competition here
CFG-PD vs SNV Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while SNV trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check SNV's competition here
CFG-PD vs SNV-PD Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while SNV-PD trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check SNV-PD's competition here
CFG-PD vs BOKF Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BOKF trades at $101.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BOKF's competition here
CFG-PD vs PB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while PB trades at $66.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check PB's competition here
CFG-PD vs CADE Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while CADE trades at $34.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check CADE's competition here
CFG-PD vs HOMB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HOMB trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HOMB's competition here
CFG-PD vs OZK Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while OZK trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check OZK's competition here
CFG-PD vs FNB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FNB trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FNB's competition here
CFG-PD vs VLY Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while VLY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check VLY's competition here
CFG-PD vs BXS Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check BXS's competition here
CFG-PD vs GBCI Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while GBCI trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check GBCI's competition here
CFG-PD vs VLYPO Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while VLYPO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check VLYPO's competition here
CFG-PD vs VLYPP Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while VLYPP trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check VLYPP's competition here
CFG-PD vs UBSI Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while UBSI trades at $35.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check UBSI's competition here
CFG-PD vs COLB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while COLB trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check COLB's competition here
CFG-PD vs HWC Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HWC trades at $58.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HWC's competition here
CFG-PD vs HWCPZ Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while HWCPZ trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check HWCPZ's competition here
CFG-PD vs NYCB-PA Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
CFG-PD vs FFIN Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FFIN trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FFIN's competition here
CFG-PD vs FLG Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while FLG trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check FLG's competition here
CFG-PD vs AX Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while AX trades at $85.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check AX's competition here
CFG-PD vs ABCB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while ABCB trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check ABCB's competition here
CFG-PD vs AUB Comparison August 2025
CFG-PD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFG-PD stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFG-PD is priced at $24.99, while AUB trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFG-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, CFG-PD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFG-PD is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFG-PD.Check AUB's competition here