CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. CBAT Peers
See (CBAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBAT | $0.87 | -0.46% | 78.43M | 6.71 | $0.13 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | N/A | 69.02B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| VRT | $106.04 | +0.63% | 40.41B | 61.65 | $1.72 | +0.12% |
| HUBB | $392.18 | +1.43% | 20.93B | 26.48 | $14.81 | +1.29% |
| NVT | $67.59 | +1.11% | 11.13B | 46.94 | $1.44 | +1.15% |
| AYI | $273.14 | +0.48% | 8.44B | 21.80 | $12.53 | +0.23% |
| BE | $20.10 | +1.39% | 4.67B | 1004.75 | $0.02 | N/A |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.58B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| AEIS | $118.15 | -0.51% | 4.45B | 59.67 | $1.98 | +0.34% |
| ENS | $99.86 | +0.21% | 3.94B | 12.39 | $8.06 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
CBAT vs ABB Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs VRT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 40.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while VRT trades at $106.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 61.65. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs HUBB Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 20.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while HUBB trades at $392.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs NVT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 11.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while NVT trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 46.94. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs AYI Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while AYI trades at $273.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs BE Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while BE trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1004.75. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs WIRE Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs AEIS Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while AEIS trades at $118.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 59.67. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ENS Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ENS trades at $99.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs HAYW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while HAYW trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ATKR Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ATKR trades at $68.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs POWL Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while POWL trades at $183.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ENR Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ENR trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs HOLI Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ENVX Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ENVX trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs EOSE Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while EOSE trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs MVST Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while MVST trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ADSEW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 925.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ADSEW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs PLUG Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 832.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while PLUG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs PLPC Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 682.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while PLPC trades at $138.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ADSE Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 673.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ADSE trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADSE's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs KE Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 429.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while KE trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 55.03. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs AMPX-WT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 347.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ELPW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 341.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ELPW trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -37.94. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs AMPX Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 327.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while AMPX trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SES-WT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 306.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SES-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs AIRJ Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 266.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while AIRJ trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs FREY Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs EAF Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 236.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while EAF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs LTBR Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 233.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while LTBR trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs NVX Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 229.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while NVX trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SLDP Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 192.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SLDP trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs TE Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 182.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while TE trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ELVA Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 121.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ELVA trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -76.00. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs EOSEW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 118.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while EOSEW trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs NEOV Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 111.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while NEOV trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -27.17. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ESP Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 103.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ESP trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SKYX Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SKYX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs MVSTW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 100.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while MVSTW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs OPTT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 99.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while OPTT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs ULBI Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 95.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while ULBI trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs FCEL Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 93.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while FCEL trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs RAYA Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 63.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while RAYA trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs NEOVW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 47.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while NEOVW trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs RFIL Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 42.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while RFIL trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs IPWR Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 41.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while IPWR trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SDST Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 41.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SDST trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs PPSI Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 33.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while PPSI trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs CHEV Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 33.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while CHEV trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs APWC Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 32.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while APWC trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs FLUX Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 31.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while FLUX trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs GWH-WT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 30.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SLDPW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 26.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SLDPW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SVT Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 26.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SVT trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs GWH Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 26.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while GWH trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs OESX Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 24.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while OESX trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs CCTG Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 14.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while CCTG trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs PITA Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs STI Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while STI trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs NXU Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs POLA Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while POLA trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs SDSTW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 4.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while SDSTW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs XPON Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while XPON trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs DFLI Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while DFLI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DFLI's ROE of -20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs DFLIW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of -20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs DCFC Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 30248.00. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.
CBAT vs DCFCW Comparison
CBAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 78.43M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14027.00. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.87, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.