The Cato Corporation

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while TJX trades at $132.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TJX's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while ROST trades at $147.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ROST's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while LULU trades at $195.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LULU's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while BURL trades at $281.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BURL's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while ONON trades at $44.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 87.13. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ONON's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while GPS trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GPS's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while GAP trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GAP's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while URBN trades at $77.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check URBN's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while BOOT trades at $162.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BOOT's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while ANF trades at $97.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ANF's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while BKE trades at $56.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BKE's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while FL trades at $25.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FL's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while AEO trades at $12.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check AEO's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while VSCO trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check VSCO's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while HIBB trades at $87.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check HIBB's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 949.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while CRI trades at $26.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CRI's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while CHS trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CHS's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 686.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while GES trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GES's P/E ratio is -120.05. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GES's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while SFIX trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SFIX's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while SCVL trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SCVL's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while GCO trades at $26.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is -16.08. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GCO's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while ZUMZ trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is -774.50. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ZUMZ's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while CTRN trades at $32.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTRN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CTRN's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while CURV trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CURV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CURV's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while JILL trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JILL's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while DBI trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBI's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while PLCE trades at $4.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check PLCE's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while DLTH trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DLTH's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while DXLG trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DXLG's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while BIRD trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BIRD's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while TLYS trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TLYS's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while DBGI trades at $8.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGI's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGIW's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while RENT trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RENT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check RENT's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while LVLU trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LVLU's competition here

CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 56M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.84, while EXPR trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check EXPR's competition here