BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Tangible Equity Unit
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Tangible Equity Unit (BTSGU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTSGU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTSGU | $83.55 | -2.85% | 4.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VEEV | $285.18 | -1.95% | 46.6B | 60.56 | $4.71 | N/A |
| GEHC | $74.59 | -0.84% | 34.1B | 15.28 | $4.88 | +0.18% |
| GEHCV | $56.00 | -4.08% | 25.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DOCS | $66.40 | -1.98% | 12.4B | 56.74 | $1.17 | N/A |
| SGFY | $30.49 | +0.07% | 8.9B | 70.91 | $0.43 | N/A |
| HQY | $87.42 | -2.67% | 7.6B | 63.81 | $1.37 | N/A |
| RCM | $14.31 | N/A | 6B | -102.21 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| BTSG | $24.08 | -3.18% | 4.3B | 96.32 | $0.25 | N/A |
| WGS | $121.87 | -5.28% | 3.5B | 1521.25 | $0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BTSGU vs VEEV Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while VEEV trades at $285.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 60.56. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check VEEV's competition here
BTSGU vs GEHC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GEHC has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while GEHC trades at $74.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEHC's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEHC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to GEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check GEHC's competition here
BTSGU vs GEHCV Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check GEHCV's competition here
BTSGU vs DOCS Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while DOCS trades at $66.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check DOCS's competition here
BTSGU vs SGFY Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SGFY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGFY's P/E ratio is 70.91. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGFY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to SGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SGFY's competition here
BTSGU vs HQY Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while HQY trades at $87.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 63.81. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to HQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check HQY's competition here
BTSGU vs RCM Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while RCM trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to RCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check RCM's competition here
BTSGU vs BTSG Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while BTSG trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 96.32. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check BTSG's competition here
BTSGU vs WGS Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WGS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while WGS trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGS's P/E ratio is 1521.25. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to WGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check WGS's competition here
BTSGU vs ONEM Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ONEM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ONEM's competition here
BTSGU vs PRVA Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while PRVA trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 194.55. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check PRVA's competition here
BTSGU vs PINC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PINC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while PINC trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINC's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PINC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to PINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check PINC's competition here
BTSGU vs PGNY Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PGNY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while PGNY trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGNY's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to PGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check PGNY's competition here
BTSGU vs PHR Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PHR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while PHR trades at $30.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHR's P/E ratio is -41.07. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to PHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check PHR's competition here
BTSGU vs TXG Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TXG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while TXG trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXG's P/E ratio is -20.10. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TXG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to TXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check TXG's competition here
BTSGU vs CERT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CERT trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is 216.20. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CERT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to CERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CERT's competition here
BTSGU vs NXGN Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while NXGN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check NXGN's competition here
BTSGU vs OMCL Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while OMCL trades at $33.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 66.19. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check OMCL's competition here
BTSGU vs GDRX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while GDRX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 47.22. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check GDRX's competition here
BTSGU vs SDGR Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SDGR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SDGR trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDGR's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SDGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SDGR's competition here
BTSGU vs AGTI Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while AGTI trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check AGTI's competition here
BTSGU vs TDOC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while TDOC trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check TDOC's competition here
BTSGU vs CTEV Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CTEV trades at $71.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTEV's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CTEV's competition here
BTSGU vs EVH Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while EVH trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to EVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check EVH's competition here
BTSGU vs HSTM Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 822.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while HSTM trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check HSTM's competition here
BTSGU vs MPLN-WT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MPLN-WT's competition here
BTSGU vs ACCD Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ACCD trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to ACCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ACCD's competition here
BTSGU vs SY Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 536M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SY trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SY's competition here
BTSGU vs SHCR Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SHCR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SHCR's competition here
BTSGU vs NUTX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NUTX has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while NUTX trades at $89.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUTX's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUTX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to NUTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check NUTX's competition here
BTSGU vs DH Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 415.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while DH trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DH's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DH's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to DH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check DH's competition here
BTSGU vs SLGC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SLGC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SLGC's competition here
BTSGU vs SLGCW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SLGCW's competition here
BTSGU vs MPLN Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MPLN trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPLN's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MPLN's competition here
BTSGU vs SPOK Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SPOK trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SPOK's competition here
BTSGU vs NRC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while NRC trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to NRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check NRC's competition here
BTSGU vs OPRX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while OPRX trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check OPRX's competition here
BTSGU vs TBRG Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 298.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while TBRG trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is -26.14. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBRG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check TBRG's competition here
BTSGU vs TRHC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while TRHC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check TRHC's competition here
BTSGU vs SLP Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SLP has a market cap of 282.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SLP trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLP's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLP's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SLP's competition here
BTSGU vs SMFR Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SMFR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMFR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SMFR's competition here
BTSGU vs HCAT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while HCAT trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check HCAT's competition here
BTSGU vs SOPH Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SOPH trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SOPH's competition here
BTSGU vs CCLD Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CCLD trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is -159.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CCLD's competition here
BTSGU vs CPSI Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CPSI trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPSI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CPSI's competition here
BTSGU vs AUGX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while AUGX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check AUGX's competition here
BTSGU vs CCLDO Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CCLDO trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CCLDO's competition here
BTSGU vs AMWL Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while AMWL trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check AMWL's competition here
BTSGU vs EUDA Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EUDA has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while EUDA trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUDA's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EUDA's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to EUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check EUDA's competition here
BTSGU vs FORA Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while FORA trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -73.67. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to FORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check FORA's competition here
BTSGU vs CCLDP Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to CCLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CCLDP's competition here
BTSGU vs BEAT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BEAT has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while BEAT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAT's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BEAT's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to BEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check BEAT's competition here
BTSGU vs SNCE Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SNCE trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SNCE's competition here
BTSGU vs AKLI Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while AKLI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check AKLI's competition here
BTSGU vs SHLT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SHLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to SHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SHLT's competition here
BTSGU vs SHCRW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SHCRW's competition here
BTSGU vs BEATW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BEATW has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while BEATW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEATW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BEATW's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to BEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check BEATW's competition here
BTSGU vs ONMD Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ONMD trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ONMD's competition here
BTSGU vs STRM Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while STRM trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to STRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check STRM's competition here
BTSGU vs RNLX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while RNLX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RNLX's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check RNLX's competition here
BTSGU vs LIFW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIFW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while LIFW trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIFW's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to LIFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check LIFW's competition here
BTSGU vs MGRX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MGRX trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MGRX's competition here
BTSGU vs SCNX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SCNX has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while SCNX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCNX's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCNX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to SCNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check SCNX's competition here
BTSGU vs HCTI Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while HCTI trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HCTI's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check HCTI's competition here
BTSGU vs BBLN Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while BBLN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check BBLN's competition here
BTSGU vs VSEEW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while VSEEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check VSEEW's competition here
BTSGU vs VSEE Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while VSEE trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check VSEE's competition here
BTSGU vs INOV Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INOV has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while INOV trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOV's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INOV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to INOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check INOV's competition here
BTSGU vs BFRG Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while BFRG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check BFRG's competition here
BTSGU vs ETAO Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ETAO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ETAO's competition here
BTSGU vs HLTH Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HLTH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while HLTH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLTH's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to HLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check HLTH's competition here
BTSGU vs UPH Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while UPH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to UPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check UPH's competition here
BTSGU vs BFRGW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFRGW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while BFRGW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFRGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFRGW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to BFRGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check BFRGW's competition here
BTSGU vs ZCMD Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ZCMD trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ZCMD's competition here
BTSGU vs ACON Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ACON trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACON's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to ACON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ACON's competition here
BTSGU vs PEARW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEARW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while PEARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEARW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEARW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to PEARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check PEARW's competition here
BTSGU vs PEAR Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while PEAR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check PEAR's competition here
BTSGU vs MSPR Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSPR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MSPR trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSPR's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MSPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MSPR's competition here
BTSGU vs EUDAW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EUDAW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while EUDAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EUDAW's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to EUDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check EUDAW's competition here
BTSGU vs WGSWW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WGSWW has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while WGSWW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WGSWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to WGSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check WGSWW's competition here
BTSGU vs CMAX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CMAX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMAX's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CMAX's competition here
BTSGU vs LIFWZ Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to LIFWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check LIFWZ's competition here
BTSGU vs WORX Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while WORX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to WORX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check WORX's competition here
BTSGU vs OTRK Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 708.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while OTRK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check OTRK's competition here
BTSGU vs FOXO Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FOXO has a market cap of 287.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while FOXO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOXO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to FOXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check FOXO's competition here
BTSGU vs KERN Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KERN has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while KERN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KERN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KERN's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to KERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check KERN's competition here
BTSGU vs KERNW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while KERNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check KERNW's competition here
BTSGU vs OTRKP Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OTRKP has a market cap of 100.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while OTRKP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTRKP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OTRKP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to OTRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check OTRKP's competition here
BTSGU vs ICCT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ICCT has a market cap of 97.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ICCT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICCT's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to ICCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ICCT's competition here
BTSGU vs LIFWW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to LIFWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check LIFWW's competition here
BTSGU vs MSPRZ Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MSPRZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MSPRZ's competition here
BTSGU vs CMAXW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to CMAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CMAXW's competition here
BTSGU vs ACONW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACONW has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while ACONW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACONW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACONW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to ACONW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check ACONW's competition here
BTSGU vs MSPRW Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSPRW has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MSPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSPRW's ROE of -17.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MSPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MSPRW's competition here
BTSGU vs UTRS Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UTRS has a market cap of 89. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while UTRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UTRS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to UTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check UTRS's competition here
BTSGU vs MTBCP Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MTBCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MTBCP trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTBCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to MTBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MTBCP's competition here
BTSGU vs CSLT Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CSLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLT's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSLT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to CSLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CSLT's competition here
BTSGU vs MTBC Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MTBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while MTBC trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTBC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is less volatile compared to MTBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check MTBC's competition here
BTSGU vs CHNGU Comparison August 2025
BTSGU plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGU stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHNGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGU is priced at $83.55, while CHNGU trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGU's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHNGU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGU is more volatile compared to CHNGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGU.Check CHNGU's competition here