BT Brands, Inc.
BT Brands, Inc. BTBDW Peers
See (BTBDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTBDW | $0.04 | -12.47% | 6.8M | 0.28 | $0.14 | N/A |
| MCD | $287.46 | -0.75% | 205.5B | 25.39 | $11.32 | +2.44% |
| SBUX | $93.12 | +0.91% | 105.8B | 33.86 | $2.75 | +2.58% |
| CMG | $52.78 | +1.83% | 71.1B | 46.71 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $139.05 | +0.50% | 38.7B | 27.64 | $5.03 | +1.98% |
| DRI | $225.44 | +1.21% | 26.4B | 25.36 | $8.89 | +2.52% |
| QSR | $66.08 | -0.02% | 21.7B | 22.40 | $2.95 | +3.57% |
| YUMC | $42.83 | +0.16% | 16B | 17.92 | $2.39 | +1.87% |
| DPZ | $447.28 | +0.11% | 15.3B | 25.63 | $17.45 | +1.45% |
| TXRH | $193.02 | +0.04% | 12.8B | 29.83 | $6.47 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
BTBDW vs MCD Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while MCD trades at $287.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs SBUX Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while SBUX trades at $93.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CMG Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CMG trades at $52.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs YUM Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while YUM trades at $139.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs DRI Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while DRI trades at $225.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs QSR Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while QSR trades at $66.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs YUMC Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while YUMC trades at $42.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs DPZ Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while DPZ trades at $447.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs TXRH Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while TXRH trades at $193.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BROS Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BROS trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 173.31. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs WING Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while WING trades at $350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 58.82. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CAVA Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CAVA trades at $74.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 62.17. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs EAT Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while EAT trades at $178.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs SHAK Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while SHAK trades at $133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 475.00. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CAKE Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CAKE trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs WEN Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while WEN trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs PZZA Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while PZZA trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs ARCO Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while ARCO trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs SG Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while SG trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CBRL Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CBRL trades at $59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CNNE Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CNNE trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs HDL Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while HDL trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BJRI Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BJRI trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FWRG Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 965.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FWRG trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 93.12. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs KRUS Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 958.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while KRUS trades at $79.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -86.22. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BH-A Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BH-A trades at $1,390.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BH Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 868.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BH trades at $282.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs TWNPV Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BLMN Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 808.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BLMN trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs PTLO Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 722.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while PTLO trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs RUTH Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CHUY Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs VENU Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while VENU trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs TAST Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs NATH Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 449.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while NATH trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs DIN Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while DIN trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs PBPB Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while PBPB trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs RICK Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 347.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while RICK trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 45.90. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs LOCO Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while LOCO trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs JACK Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while JACK trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs TWNP Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while TWNP trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FRGI Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs DENN Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while DENN trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BBQ Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs MB Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while MB trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs STKS Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while STKS trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs THCHW Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs THCH Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while THCH trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs RRGB Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while RRGB trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BDL Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BDL trades at $30.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs GRIL Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FATAV Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FATBP Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FATBP trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FAT Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FAT trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FATBB Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FATBB trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FATBW Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FATBW trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs NDLS Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while NDLS trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs RAVE Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while RAVE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs ARKR Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while ARKR trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs MYT Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs YOSH Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while YOSH trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs GENK Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while GENK trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -95.00. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs GTIM Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while GTIM trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs REBN Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while REBN trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs PC Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while PC trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BTBD Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BTBD trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BTB Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs FATBV Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs CHSN Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while CHSN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BFI Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs PNST Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while PNST trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs BFIIW Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs ONDR Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.
BTBDW vs LUB Comparison
BTBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTBDW stands at 6.8M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTBDW is priced at $0.04, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTBDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.28, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTBDW's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTBDW is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTBDW.